Loading…
Researching experiences of childhood brain injury: co-constructing knowledge with children through arts-based research methods
Objective: In the knowledge base examining experiences of childhood brain injury, the perspectives of children with brain injury are notably lacking. This failure to represent the voices of pediatric clients has resulted in an incomplete knowledge base from which to inform evidence-based rehabilitat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Disability and rehabilitation 2020-09, Vol.42 (20), p.2967-2976 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d41cd0195e5f6438fb8958c945bd1b4cdd6c4768109c0eb66cf1839898160b883 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d41cd0195e5f6438fb8958c945bd1b4cdd6c4768109c0eb66cf1839898160b883 |
container_end_page | 2976 |
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 2967 |
container_title | Disability and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Mah, Katie Gladstone, Brenda King, Gillian Reed, Nick Hartman, Laura R. |
description | Objective: In the knowledge base examining experiences of childhood brain injury, the perspectives of children with brain injury are notably lacking. This failure to represent the voices of pediatric clients has resulted in an incomplete knowledge base from which to inform evidence-based rehabilitation practice. In this paper, we examine why the perspectives of children with brain injury are rarely sought and propose a new way forward.
Methods: We draw upon current evidence and practices in related fields and present an exemplar from an in-progress qualitative arts-based research project with children with brain injury.
Results: Assumptions ingrained in research practices, particularly those surrounding the capacity of 'doubly vulnerable' children with brain injury to produce knowledge, have resulted in the relative exclusion of this group from research that concerns them. For the field to evolve, research practices must value children's first-hand accounts, engage them in co-constructing knowledge about their lives, and invite methods that meet their interests and abilities.
Conclusion: By reframing how we think about the capacities of children with disabilities and shifting our research practices to include children with brain injury as knowledgeable participants, it becomes possible to expand the knowledge base upon which clinical rehabilitation practices are built.
Implications for Rehabilitation
Current research practices preclude 'doubly vulnerable' pediatric populations, including children with brain injury, from actively contributing to research that concerns them.
As a result, the perspectives of children with brain injury are virtually absent from research, rendering the evidence base upon which rehabilitative practices are built incomplete.
Reframing how we think about the capacities of children with brain injury can shift how we engage with them, both in research and clinic, and may subsequently impact the knowledge available to us.
Implications for client-centred rehabilitation are discussed, including the need to understand children as capable of insight into their own experience, as able to contribute to a more complete understanding of the health phenomena that affect them, and as invaluable and active participants in research and clinical care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09638288.2019.1574916 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_30973787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2209601511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d41cd0195e5f6438fb8958c945bd1b4cdd6c4768109c0eb66cf1839898160b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMo7uzqT1By9NJjMvnoxJOyqCssCKLnkE6qp7N2J2OSZpyLv91uZtajp4LieeulHoReUbKlRJG3REumdkptd4TqLRUt11Q-QRvKJW8EleIp2qxMs0JX6LqUB0IIZS1_jq4Y0S1rVbtBf75BAZvdEOIew-8D5ADRQcGpx8ty9ENKHnfZhohDfJjz6R12qXEplppnV9fYz5iOI_g94GOowzmWIeI65DTvB2xzLU1nC3icL214gjokX16gZ70dC7y8zBv049PH77d3zf3Xz19uP9w3jklZG8-p88ufAkQvOVN9p7RQTnPRedpx5710vJWKEu0IdFK6niqmlVZUkk4pdoPenO8ecvo1Q6lmCsXBONoIaS5mt1tcESooXVBxRl1OpWTozSGHyeaTocSs6s2jerOqNxf1S-71pWLuJvD_Uo-uF-D9GQixT3myx5RHb6o9jSn32UYXimH_7_gLTTqViA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2209601511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Researching experiences of childhood brain injury: co-constructing knowledge with children through arts-based research methods</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Mah, Katie ; Gladstone, Brenda ; King, Gillian ; Reed, Nick ; Hartman, Laura R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mah, Katie ; Gladstone, Brenda ; King, Gillian ; Reed, Nick ; Hartman, Laura R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: In the knowledge base examining experiences of childhood brain injury, the perspectives of children with brain injury are notably lacking. This failure to represent the voices of pediatric clients has resulted in an incomplete knowledge base from which to inform evidence-based rehabilitation practice. In this paper, we examine why the perspectives of children with brain injury are rarely sought and propose a new way forward.
Methods: We draw upon current evidence and practices in related fields and present an exemplar from an in-progress qualitative arts-based research project with children with brain injury.
Results: Assumptions ingrained in research practices, particularly those surrounding the capacity of 'doubly vulnerable' children with brain injury to produce knowledge, have resulted in the relative exclusion of this group from research that concerns them. For the field to evolve, research practices must value children's first-hand accounts, engage them in co-constructing knowledge about their lives, and invite methods that meet their interests and abilities.
Conclusion: By reframing how we think about the capacities of children with disabilities and shifting our research practices to include children with brain injury as knowledgeable participants, it becomes possible to expand the knowledge base upon which clinical rehabilitation practices are built.
Implications for Rehabilitation
Current research practices preclude 'doubly vulnerable' pediatric populations, including children with brain injury, from actively contributing to research that concerns them.
As a result, the perspectives of children with brain injury are virtually absent from research, rendering the evidence base upon which rehabilitative practices are built incomplete.
Reframing how we think about the capacities of children with brain injury can shift how we engage with them, both in research and clinic, and may subsequently impact the knowledge available to us.
Implications for client-centred rehabilitation are discussed, including the need to understand children as capable of insight into their own experience, as able to contribute to a more complete understanding of the health phenomena that affect them, and as invaluable and active participants in research and clinical care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1574916</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30973787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>arts-based research ; brain injury ; co-construction ; knowledge ; Pediatric ; qualitative</subject><ispartof>Disability and rehabilitation, 2020-09, Vol.42 (20), p.2967-2976</ispartof><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d41cd0195e5f6438fb8958c945bd1b4cdd6c4768109c0eb66cf1839898160b883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d41cd0195e5f6438fb8958c945bd1b4cdd6c4768109c0eb66cf1839898160b883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7246-7863 ; 0000-0001-7199-1217</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30973787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mah, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gladstone, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Laura R.</creatorcontrib><title>Researching experiences of childhood brain injury: co-constructing knowledge with children through arts-based research methods</title><title>Disability and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Disabil Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective: In the knowledge base examining experiences of childhood brain injury, the perspectives of children with brain injury are notably lacking. This failure to represent the voices of pediatric clients has resulted in an incomplete knowledge base from which to inform evidence-based rehabilitation practice. In this paper, we examine why the perspectives of children with brain injury are rarely sought and propose a new way forward.
Methods: We draw upon current evidence and practices in related fields and present an exemplar from an in-progress qualitative arts-based research project with children with brain injury.
Results: Assumptions ingrained in research practices, particularly those surrounding the capacity of 'doubly vulnerable' children with brain injury to produce knowledge, have resulted in the relative exclusion of this group from research that concerns them. For the field to evolve, research practices must value children's first-hand accounts, engage them in co-constructing knowledge about their lives, and invite methods that meet their interests and abilities.
Conclusion: By reframing how we think about the capacities of children with disabilities and shifting our research practices to include children with brain injury as knowledgeable participants, it becomes possible to expand the knowledge base upon which clinical rehabilitation practices are built.
Implications for Rehabilitation
Current research practices preclude 'doubly vulnerable' pediatric populations, including children with brain injury, from actively contributing to research that concerns them.
As a result, the perspectives of children with brain injury are virtually absent from research, rendering the evidence base upon which rehabilitative practices are built incomplete.
Reframing how we think about the capacities of children with brain injury can shift how we engage with them, both in research and clinic, and may subsequently impact the knowledge available to us.
Implications for client-centred rehabilitation are discussed, including the need to understand children as capable of insight into their own experience, as able to contribute to a more complete understanding of the health phenomena that affect them, and as invaluable and active participants in research and clinical care.</description><subject>arts-based research</subject><subject>brain injury</subject><subject>co-construction</subject><subject>knowledge</subject><subject>Pediatric</subject><subject>qualitative</subject><issn>0963-8288</issn><issn>1464-5165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE2LFDEQhoMo7uzqT1By9NJjMvnoxJOyqCssCKLnkE6qp7N2J2OSZpyLv91uZtajp4LieeulHoReUbKlRJG3REumdkptd4TqLRUt11Q-QRvKJW8EleIp2qxMs0JX6LqUB0IIZS1_jq4Y0S1rVbtBf75BAZvdEOIew-8D5ADRQcGpx8ty9ENKHnfZhohDfJjz6R12qXEplppnV9fYz5iOI_g94GOowzmWIeI65DTvB2xzLU1nC3icL214gjokX16gZ70dC7y8zBv049PH77d3zf3Xz19uP9w3jklZG8-p88ufAkQvOVN9p7RQTnPRedpx5710vJWKEu0IdFK6niqmlVZUkk4pdoPenO8ecvo1Q6lmCsXBONoIaS5mt1tcESooXVBxRl1OpWTozSGHyeaTocSs6s2jerOqNxf1S-71pWLuJvD_Uo-uF-D9GQixT3myx5RHb6o9jSn32UYXimH_7_gLTTqViA</recordid><startdate>20200924</startdate><enddate>20200924</enddate><creator>Mah, Katie</creator><creator>Gladstone, Brenda</creator><creator>King, Gillian</creator><creator>Reed, Nick</creator><creator>Hartman, Laura R.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-7863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7199-1217</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200924</creationdate><title>Researching experiences of childhood brain injury: co-constructing knowledge with children through arts-based research methods</title><author>Mah, Katie ; Gladstone, Brenda ; King, Gillian ; Reed, Nick ; Hartman, Laura R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d41cd0195e5f6438fb8958c945bd1b4cdd6c4768109c0eb66cf1839898160b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>arts-based research</topic><topic>brain injury</topic><topic>co-construction</topic><topic>knowledge</topic><topic>Pediatric</topic><topic>qualitative</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mah, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gladstone, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Laura R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Disability and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mah, Katie</au><au>Gladstone, Brenda</au><au>King, Gillian</au><au>Reed, Nick</au><au>Hartman, Laura R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Researching experiences of childhood brain injury: co-constructing knowledge with children through arts-based research methods</atitle><jtitle>Disability and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Disabil Rehabil</addtitle><date>2020-09-24</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>2967</spage><epage>2976</epage><pages>2967-2976</pages><issn>0963-8288</issn><eissn>1464-5165</eissn><abstract>Objective: In the knowledge base examining experiences of childhood brain injury, the perspectives of children with brain injury are notably lacking. This failure to represent the voices of pediatric clients has resulted in an incomplete knowledge base from which to inform evidence-based rehabilitation practice. In this paper, we examine why the perspectives of children with brain injury are rarely sought and propose a new way forward.
Methods: We draw upon current evidence and practices in related fields and present an exemplar from an in-progress qualitative arts-based research project with children with brain injury.
Results: Assumptions ingrained in research practices, particularly those surrounding the capacity of 'doubly vulnerable' children with brain injury to produce knowledge, have resulted in the relative exclusion of this group from research that concerns them. For the field to evolve, research practices must value children's first-hand accounts, engage them in co-constructing knowledge about their lives, and invite methods that meet their interests and abilities.
Conclusion: By reframing how we think about the capacities of children with disabilities and shifting our research practices to include children with brain injury as knowledgeable participants, it becomes possible to expand the knowledge base upon which clinical rehabilitation practices are built.
Implications for Rehabilitation
Current research practices preclude 'doubly vulnerable' pediatric populations, including children with brain injury, from actively contributing to research that concerns them.
As a result, the perspectives of children with brain injury are virtually absent from research, rendering the evidence base upon which rehabilitative practices are built incomplete.
Reframing how we think about the capacities of children with brain injury can shift how we engage with them, both in research and clinic, and may subsequently impact the knowledge available to us.
Implications for client-centred rehabilitation are discussed, including the need to understand children as capable of insight into their own experience, as able to contribute to a more complete understanding of the health phenomena that affect them, and as invaluable and active participants in research and clinical care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>30973787</pmid><doi>10.1080/09638288.2019.1574916</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-7863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7199-1217</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-8288 |
ispartof | Disability and rehabilitation, 2020-09, Vol.42 (20), p.2967-2976 |
issn | 0963-8288 1464-5165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_30973787 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | arts-based research brain injury co-construction knowledge Pediatric qualitative |
title | Researching experiences of childhood brain injury: co-constructing knowledge with children through arts-based research methods |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A30%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Researching%20experiences%20of%20childhood%20brain%20injury:%20co-constructing%20knowledge%20with%20children%20through%20arts-based%20research%20methods&rft.jtitle=Disability%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Mah,%20Katie&rft.date=2020-09-24&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=2967&rft.epage=2976&rft.pages=2967-2976&rft.issn=0963-8288&rft.eissn=1464-5165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09638288.2019.1574916&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2209601511%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-d41cd0195e5f6438fb8958c945bd1b4cdd6c4768109c0eb66cf1839898160b883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2209601511&rft_id=info:pmid/30973787&rfr_iscdi=true |