Loading…
Accurate Markov Boundary Discovery for Causal Feature Selection
Causal feature selection has achieved much attention in recent years, which discovers a Markov boundary (MB) of the class attribute. The MB of the class attribute implies local causal relations between the class attribute and the features, thus leading to more interpretable and robust prediction mod...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on cybernetics 2020-12, Vol.50 (12), p.4983-4996 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2c966db8b92c52bc824fdbd37049974f7d111d946103e244d04e3d0de2ebf2253 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2c966db8b92c52bc824fdbd37049974f7d111d946103e244d04e3d0de2ebf2253 |
container_end_page | 4996 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4983 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on cybernetics |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Wu, Xingyu Jiang, Bingbing Yu, Kui Miao, chunyan Chen, Huanhuan |
description | Causal feature selection has achieved much attention in recent years, which discovers a Markov boundary (MB) of the class attribute. The MB of the class attribute implies local causal relations between the class attribute and the features, thus leading to more interpretable and robust prediction models than the features selected by the traditional feature selection algorithms. Many causal feature selection methods have been proposed, and almost all of them employ conditional independence (CI) tests to identify MBs. However, many datasets from real-world applications may suffer from incorrect CI tests due to noise or small-sized samples, resulting in lower MB discovery accuracy for these existing algorithms. To tackle this issue, in this article, we first introduce a new concept of PCMasking to explain a type of incorrect CI tests in the MB discovery, then propose a cross-check and complement MB discovery (CCMB) algorithm to repair this type of incorrect CI tests for accurate MB discovery. To improve the efficiency of CCMB, we further design a pipeline machine-based CCMB (PM-CCMB) algorithm. Using benchmark Bayesian network datasets, the experiments demonstrate that both CCMB and PM-CCMB achieve significant improvements on the MB discovery accuracy compared with the existing methods, and PM-CCMB further improves the computational efficiency. The empirical study in the real-world datasets validates the effectiveness of CCMB and PM-CCMB against the state-of-the-art causal and traditional feature selection algorithms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2940509 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31634853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8877773</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2468752830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2c966db8b92c52bc824fdbd37049974f7d111d946103e244d04e3d0de2ebf2253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQQIMottT-ABFkwYuX1nztJjlJW60KFQ_Wg6ewm8xC63ZTk92C_94srT04lxkyb4bJQ-iS4DEhWN0tZ5_TMcVEjaniOMXqBPUpyeSIUpGeHutM9NAwhDWOIeOTkueox0jGuExZH91PjGl93kDymvsvt0umrq1t7n-Sh1UwbgexKp1PZnkb8iqZQ960HpJ3qMA0K1dfoLMyrwIMD3mAPuaPy9nzaPH29DKbLEaGk7QZUaOyzBayUNSktDCS8tIWlgnMlRK8FJYQYhXPCGZAObeYA7PYAoWipDRlA3S737v17ruF0OhNvA-qKq_BtUFThoVgBKcdevMPXbvW1_E6TXkmRUolw5Eie8p4F4KHUm_9ahM_rgnWnWDdCdadYH0QHGeuD5vbYgP2OPGnMwJXe2AFAMe2lCIGY79Np3zI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2468752830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accurate Markov Boundary Discovery for Causal Feature Selection</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Wu, Xingyu ; Jiang, Bingbing ; Yu, Kui ; Miao, chunyan ; Chen, Huanhuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xingyu ; Jiang, Bingbing ; Yu, Kui ; Miao, chunyan ; Chen, Huanhuan</creatorcontrib><description>Causal feature selection has achieved much attention in recent years, which discovers a Markov boundary (MB) of the class attribute. The MB of the class attribute implies local causal relations between the class attribute and the features, thus leading to more interpretable and robust prediction models than the features selected by the traditional feature selection algorithms. Many causal feature selection methods have been proposed, and almost all of them employ conditional independence (CI) tests to identify MBs. However, many datasets from real-world applications may suffer from incorrect CI tests due to noise or small-sized samples, resulting in lower MB discovery accuracy for these existing algorithms. To tackle this issue, in this article, we first introduce a new concept of PCMasking to explain a type of incorrect CI tests in the MB discovery, then propose a cross-check and complement MB discovery (CCMB) algorithm to repair this type of incorrect CI tests for accurate MB discovery. To improve the efficiency of CCMB, we further design a pipeline machine-based CCMB (PM-CCMB) algorithm. Using benchmark Bayesian network datasets, the experiments demonstrate that both CCMB and PM-CCMB achieve significant improvements on the MB discovery accuracy compared with the existing methods, and PM-CCMB further improves the computational efficiency. The empirical study in the real-world datasets validates the effectiveness of CCMB and PM-CCMB against the state-of-the-art causal and traditional feature selection algorithms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-2275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2940509</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31634853</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCEB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Bayes methods ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian network (BN) ; Benchmark testing ; causal feature selection ; Computer science ; Cybernetics ; Datasets ; Feature extraction ; Feature selection ; Markov boundary (MB) ; Markov processes ; PCMasking ; Pipeline design ; Prediction algorithms ; Prediction models</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2020-12, Vol.50 (12), p.4983-4996</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2c966db8b92c52bc824fdbd37049974f7d111d946103e244d04e3d0de2ebf2253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2c966db8b92c52bc824fdbd37049974f7d111d946103e244d04e3d0de2ebf2253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0300-3448 ; 0000-0002-3918-384X ; 0000-0003-2442-4572 ; 0000-0002-8204-6197 ; 0000-0003-2217-6202</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8877773$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31634853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bingbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huanhuan</creatorcontrib><title>Accurate Markov Boundary Discovery for Causal Feature Selection</title><title>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</title><addtitle>TCYB</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Cybern</addtitle><description>Causal feature selection has achieved much attention in recent years, which discovers a Markov boundary (MB) of the class attribute. The MB of the class attribute implies local causal relations between the class attribute and the features, thus leading to more interpretable and robust prediction models than the features selected by the traditional feature selection algorithms. Many causal feature selection methods have been proposed, and almost all of them employ conditional independence (CI) tests to identify MBs. However, many datasets from real-world applications may suffer from incorrect CI tests due to noise or small-sized samples, resulting in lower MB discovery accuracy for these existing algorithms. To tackle this issue, in this article, we first introduce a new concept of PCMasking to explain a type of incorrect CI tests in the MB discovery, then propose a cross-check and complement MB discovery (CCMB) algorithm to repair this type of incorrect CI tests for accurate MB discovery. To improve the efficiency of CCMB, we further design a pipeline machine-based CCMB (PM-CCMB) algorithm. Using benchmark Bayesian network datasets, the experiments demonstrate that both CCMB and PM-CCMB achieve significant improvements on the MB discovery accuracy compared with the existing methods, and PM-CCMB further improves the computational efficiency. The empirical study in the real-world datasets validates the effectiveness of CCMB and PM-CCMB against the state-of-the-art causal and traditional feature selection algorithms.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayes methods</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian network (BN)</subject><subject>Benchmark testing</subject><subject>causal feature selection</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Cybernetics</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Feature selection</subject><subject>Markov boundary (MB)</subject><subject>Markov processes</subject><subject>PCMasking</subject><subject>Pipeline design</subject><subject>Prediction algorithms</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><issn>2168-2267</issn><issn>2168-2275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQQIMottT-ABFkwYuX1nztJjlJW60KFQ_Wg6ewm8xC63ZTk92C_94srT04lxkyb4bJQ-iS4DEhWN0tZ5_TMcVEjaniOMXqBPUpyeSIUpGeHutM9NAwhDWOIeOTkueox0jGuExZH91PjGl93kDymvsvt0umrq1t7n-Sh1UwbgexKp1PZnkb8iqZQ960HpJ3qMA0K1dfoLMyrwIMD3mAPuaPy9nzaPH29DKbLEaGk7QZUaOyzBayUNSktDCS8tIWlgnMlRK8FJYQYhXPCGZAObeYA7PYAoWipDRlA3S737v17ruF0OhNvA-qKq_BtUFThoVgBKcdevMPXbvW1_E6TXkmRUolw5Eie8p4F4KHUm_9ahM_rgnWnWDdCdadYH0QHGeuD5vbYgP2OPGnMwJXe2AFAMe2lCIGY79Np3zI</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Wu, Xingyu</creator><creator>Jiang, Bingbing</creator><creator>Yu, Kui</creator><creator>Miao, chunyan</creator><creator>Chen, Huanhuan</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0300-3448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-384X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-4572</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8204-6197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2217-6202</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Accurate Markov Boundary Discovery for Causal Feature Selection</title><author>Wu, Xingyu ; Jiang, Bingbing ; Yu, Kui ; Miao, chunyan ; Chen, Huanhuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2c966db8b92c52bc824fdbd37049974f7d111d946103e244d04e3d0de2ebf2253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayes methods</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian network (BN)</topic><topic>Benchmark testing</topic><topic>causal feature selection</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Cybernetics</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Feature selection</topic><topic>Markov boundary (MB)</topic><topic>Markov processes</topic><topic>PCMasking</topic><topic>Pipeline design</topic><topic>Prediction algorithms</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xingyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bingbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huanhuan</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Xingyu</au><au>Jiang, Bingbing</au><au>Yu, Kui</au><au>Miao, chunyan</au><au>Chen, Huanhuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accurate Markov Boundary Discovery for Causal Feature Selection</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle><stitle>TCYB</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Cybern</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4983</spage><epage>4996</epage><pages>4983-4996</pages><issn>2168-2267</issn><eissn>2168-2275</eissn><coden>ITCEB8</coden><abstract>Causal feature selection has achieved much attention in recent years, which discovers a Markov boundary (MB) of the class attribute. The MB of the class attribute implies local causal relations between the class attribute and the features, thus leading to more interpretable and robust prediction models than the features selected by the traditional feature selection algorithms. Many causal feature selection methods have been proposed, and almost all of them employ conditional independence (CI) tests to identify MBs. However, many datasets from real-world applications may suffer from incorrect CI tests due to noise or small-sized samples, resulting in lower MB discovery accuracy for these existing algorithms. To tackle this issue, in this article, we first introduce a new concept of PCMasking to explain a type of incorrect CI tests in the MB discovery, then propose a cross-check and complement MB discovery (CCMB) algorithm to repair this type of incorrect CI tests for accurate MB discovery. To improve the efficiency of CCMB, we further design a pipeline machine-based CCMB (PM-CCMB) algorithm. Using benchmark Bayesian network datasets, the experiments demonstrate that both CCMB and PM-CCMB achieve significant improvements on the MB discovery accuracy compared with the existing methods, and PM-CCMB further improves the computational efficiency. The empirical study in the real-world datasets validates the effectiveness of CCMB and PM-CCMB against the state-of-the-art causal and traditional feature selection algorithms.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>31634853</pmid><doi>10.1109/TCYB.2019.2940509</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0300-3448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-384X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-4572</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8204-6197</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2217-6202</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-2267 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2020-12, Vol.50 (12), p.4983-4996 |
issn | 2168-2267 2168-2275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31634853 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Bayes methods Bayesian analysis Bayesian network (BN) Benchmark testing causal feature selection Computer science Cybernetics Datasets Feature extraction Feature selection Markov boundary (MB) Markov processes PCMasking Pipeline design Prediction algorithms Prediction models |
title | Accurate Markov Boundary Discovery for Causal Feature Selection |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A32%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accurate%20Markov%20Boundary%20Discovery%20for%20Causal%20Feature%20Selection&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20cybernetics&rft.au=Wu,%20Xingyu&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4983&rft.epage=4996&rft.pages=4983-4996&rft.issn=2168-2267&rft.eissn=2168-2275&rft.coden=ITCEB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCYB.2019.2940509&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2468752830%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-2c966db8b92c52bc824fdbd37049974f7d111d946103e244d04e3d0de2ebf2253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2468752830&rft_id=info:pmid/31634853&rft_ieee_id=8877773&rfr_iscdi=true |