Loading…
Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized clinical trial
It is not clear which mechanical ventilation mode should be used in bariatric surgery, one of the treatment options for patients with obesity. To compare volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in terms of respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gas values in patients unde...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) 2019-11, Vol.69 (6), p.546-552 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; por |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 552 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 546 |
container_title | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Ozyurt, Erhan Kavakli, Ali Sait Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut |
description | It is not clear which mechanical ventilation mode should be used in bariatric surgery, one of the treatment options for patients with obesity.
To compare volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in terms of respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gas values in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
Sixty-two patients with morbid obesity scheduled for gastric bypass were included in this study. Their ideal body weights were calculated during preoperative visits, and patients were divided into two groups, volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation. The patients were ventilated in accordance with a previously determined algorithm. Mechanical ventilation parameters and arterial blood gas analysis were recorded 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery. Also, the dynamic compliance, inspired O
pressure/fractional O
ratio, and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient pressure were calculated.
Peak airway pressures were lower in patients ventilated in pressure-controlled ventilation mode at the end of surgery (p = 0.011). Otherwise, there was no difference between groups in terms of intraoperative respiratory parameters and arterial blood gas analyses.
Pressure-controlled ventilation mode is not superior to volume-controlled ventilation mode in patients with laparoscopic bariatric surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.08.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31806235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322742847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-28e30b8fd9be99b51dd4086df6898fa1d8f06dfdf0ba471a19b4d2acbd9d57853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtKAzEUhoMgtlZfwIVk6WbGJHPLuJPiDQpuFNyVk8toSiYZk5lCfRPf1hTrwtW5_f_3w0HogpKcElpfb3KxAZczQtuc8JyQ6gjNKSd11pLmbYZOY9wQwuqKkhM0K_YXVlRz9L30_QDBRO-w7_DW26nXmfRuDN5arTA4hYegY5zCv_1Wu9FYGM3e6HBSDCbA6MMO91p-gDMyYuOwhYT3UfrBSCxSEowhdQn3rsPuBocU4HvzlZDSmuQCi5MC7Bk67sBGfX6oC_R6f_eyfMxWzw9Py9tVNlBWjxnjuiCCd6oVum1FRZUqCa9VV_OWd0AV70iaVEcElA0F2opSMZBCtapqeFUs0NUvdwj-c9JxXPcmSm0tOO2nuGYFY03JeNkk6eVBOoleq_UQTA9ht_57Z_EDSo58rA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322742847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized clinical trial</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><source>SciELO</source><creator>Ozyurt, Erhan ; Kavakli, Ali Sait ; Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozyurt, Erhan ; Kavakli, Ali Sait ; Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut</creatorcontrib><description>It is not clear which mechanical ventilation mode should be used in bariatric surgery, one of the treatment options for patients with obesity.
To compare volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in terms of respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gas values in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
Sixty-two patients with morbid obesity scheduled for gastric bypass were included in this study. Their ideal body weights were calculated during preoperative visits, and patients were divided into two groups, volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation. The patients were ventilated in accordance with a previously determined algorithm. Mechanical ventilation parameters and arterial blood gas analysis were recorded 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery. Also, the dynamic compliance, inspired O
pressure/fractional O
ratio, and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient pressure were calculated.
Peak airway pressures were lower in patients ventilated in pressure-controlled ventilation mode at the end of surgery (p = 0.011). Otherwise, there was no difference between groups in terms of intraoperative respiratory parameters and arterial blood gas analyses.
Pressure-controlled ventilation mode is not superior to volume-controlled ventilation mode in patients with laparoscopic bariatric surgery.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1806-907X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.08.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31806235</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><ispartof>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2019-11, Vol.69 (6), p.546-552</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozyurt, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavakli, Ali Sait</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized clinical trial</title><title>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Anestesiol</addtitle><description>It is not clear which mechanical ventilation mode should be used in bariatric surgery, one of the treatment options for patients with obesity.
To compare volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in terms of respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gas values in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
Sixty-two patients with morbid obesity scheduled for gastric bypass were included in this study. Their ideal body weights were calculated during preoperative visits, and patients were divided into two groups, volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation. The patients were ventilated in accordance with a previously determined algorithm. Mechanical ventilation parameters and arterial blood gas analysis were recorded 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery. Also, the dynamic compliance, inspired O
pressure/fractional O
ratio, and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient pressure were calculated.
Peak airway pressures were lower in patients ventilated in pressure-controlled ventilation mode at the end of surgery (p = 0.011). Otherwise, there was no difference between groups in terms of intraoperative respiratory parameters and arterial blood gas analyses.
Pressure-controlled ventilation mode is not superior to volume-controlled ventilation mode in patients with laparoscopic bariatric surgery.</description><issn>1806-907X</issn><issn>2352-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMtKAzEUhoMgtlZfwIVk6WbGJHPLuJPiDQpuFNyVk8toSiYZk5lCfRPf1hTrwtW5_f_3w0HogpKcElpfb3KxAZczQtuc8JyQ6gjNKSd11pLmbYZOY9wQwuqKkhM0K_YXVlRz9L30_QDBRO-w7_DW26nXmfRuDN5arTA4hYegY5zCv_1Wu9FYGM3e6HBSDCbA6MMO91p-gDMyYuOwhYT3UfrBSCxSEowhdQn3rsPuBocU4HvzlZDSmuQCi5MC7Bk67sBGfX6oC_R6f_eyfMxWzw9Py9tVNlBWjxnjuiCCd6oVum1FRZUqCa9VV_OWd0AV70iaVEcElA0F2opSMZBCtapqeFUs0NUvdwj-c9JxXPcmSm0tOO2nuGYFY03JeNkk6eVBOoleq_UQTA9ht_57Z_EDSo58rA</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Ozyurt, Erhan</creator><creator>Kavakli, Ali Sait</creator><creator>Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized clinical trial</title><author>Ozyurt, Erhan ; Kavakli, Ali Sait ; Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-28e30b8fd9be99b51dd4086df6898fa1d8f06dfdf0ba471a19b4d2acbd9d57853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozyurt, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavakli, Ali Sait</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozyurt, Erhan</au><au>Kavakli, Ali Sait</au><au>Ozturk, Nilgun Kavrut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Anestesiol</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>552</epage><pages>546-552</pages><eissn>1806-907X</eissn><eissn>2352-2291</eissn><abstract>It is not clear which mechanical ventilation mode should be used in bariatric surgery, one of the treatment options for patients with obesity.
To compare volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in terms of respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gas values in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
Sixty-two patients with morbid obesity scheduled for gastric bypass were included in this study. Their ideal body weights were calculated during preoperative visits, and patients were divided into two groups, volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation. The patients were ventilated in accordance with a previously determined algorithm. Mechanical ventilation parameters and arterial blood gas analysis were recorded 5 minutes after induction, 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery. Also, the dynamic compliance, inspired O
pressure/fractional O
ratio, and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient pressure were calculated.
Peak airway pressures were lower in patients ventilated in pressure-controlled ventilation mode at the end of surgery (p = 0.011). Otherwise, there was no difference between groups in terms of intraoperative respiratory parameters and arterial blood gas analyses.
Pressure-controlled ventilation mode is not superior to volume-controlled ventilation mode in patients with laparoscopic bariatric surgery.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>31806235</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjan.2019.08.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1806-907X |
ispartof | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2019-11, Vol.69 (6), p.546-552 |
issn | 1806-907X 2352-2291 |
language | eng ; por |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31806235 |
source | BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS; SciELO |
title | Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: randomized clinical trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A16%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20volume-controlled%20and%20pressure-controlled%20ventilation%20on%20respiratory%20mechanics%20in%20laparoscopic%20bariatric%20surgery:%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20anesthesiology%20(Elsevier)&rft.au=Ozyurt,%20Erhan&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=552&rft.pages=546-552&rft.eissn=1806-907X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2322742847%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-28e30b8fd9be99b51dd4086df6898fa1d8f06dfdf0ba471a19b4d2acbd9d57853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322742847&rft_id=info:pmid/31806235&rfr_iscdi=true |