Old enemy, new threat: you can’t solve today’s problems with yesterday’s solution

• Published in: Journal of radiological protection 2021-06, Vol.41 (2), p.452-458
• Main Author: Rehani, Madan M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: computed tomography; cumulative effective dose; high patient doses; justification; optimisation; principles of radiation protection; radiation risks patients
• ISSN: 0952-4746; 1361-6498
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abe2ba

The radiation protection principles of justification, optimization, and dose limitation as enumerated by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) have been guiding light for the profession for over three decades. The dose limitation does not apply to medical exposure but keeping patients' doses low is achieved through optimization, particularly by developing and using diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). There are new findings that demonstrate that despite using the best possible approaches to justification and optimization including as well use of DRLs, a very large number of patients are receiving doses in excess of 100 mSv of effective dose or organ doses exceeding 100 mGy. A non-ignorable fraction of patients is receiving such high doses in a single day. The magnitude of such patients creates the need for a relook into the principles with the intent to what can be done to attend to today's problems. A look at other areas such as approaches, and principles used in the pharmaceutical industry and in traffic management throws some light into what can be learnt from these examples. It appears that the system needs to be enriched to deal with the protection of the individual patient. The currently available approaches and even the principles are largely based on the protection of the population or group of patients. The third level of justification for individual needs further refinement to take into account series of imaging many patients are needing, and cumulative radiation doses involved, many of which happen in a short duration of one to five years. There is every likelihood of patient radiation doses continuing to increase further that underscores the need for timely attention. This paper provides several suggestions to deal with the situation.