Automated artifact rejection algorithms harm P3 Speller brain-computer interface performance

• Published in: Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) England), 2019-10, Vol.6 (4), p.141-148
• Main Authors: Thompson, David E., Mowla, Md. Rakibul, Dhuyvetter, Katie J., Tillman, Joseph W., Huggins, Jane E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: artifacts rejection; Brain-computer interfaces; P300 Speller; physiological signals; signal processing
• ISSN: 2326-263X; 2326-2621
• DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2020.1734401

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) have been used to restore communication and control to people with severe paralysis. However, noninvasive BCIs based on electroencephalogram (EEG) are particularly vulnerable to noise artifacts. These artifacts, including electro-oculogram (EOG), can be orders of magnitude larger than the signal to be detected. Many automated methods have been proposed to remove EOG and other artifacts from EEG recordings, most based on blind source separation. This work presents a performance comparison of ten different automated artifact removal methods. Unfortunately, all tested methods substantially and significantly reduced P3 Speller BCI performance, and all methods were more likely to reduce performance than increase it. The least harmful methods were titled SOBI, JADER, and EFICA, but even these methods caused an average of approximately ten percentage points drop in BCI accuracy. Possible mechanistic causes for this empirical performance reduction are proposed.