Loading…

The Impact of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) on the Decision-Making Process in the Treatment of ALK-Rearranged Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC) After Failure of 2 nd /3 rd -Generation ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)

The use of CGP in guiding treatment decisions in aNSCLC with acquired resistance to ALK TKIs is questionable. We prospectively assessed the impact of CGP on the decision-making process in ALK-rearranged aNSCLC patients following progression on 2 /3 -generation ALK TKIs. Physician's choice of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in oncology 2022, Vol.12, p.874712
Main Authors: Raphael, Ari, Onn, Amir, Holtzman, Liran, Dudnik, Julia, Urban, Damien, Kian, Waleed, Cohen, Aharon Y, Moskovitz, Mor, Zer, Alona, Bar, Jair, Rabinovich, Natalie Maimon, Grynberg, Shirly, Oedegaard, Cecilie, Agbarya, Abed, Peled, Nir, Shochat, Tzippy, Dudnik, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of CGP in guiding treatment decisions in aNSCLC with acquired resistance to ALK TKIs is questionable. We prospectively assessed the impact of CGP on the decision-making process in ALK-rearranged aNSCLC patients following progression on 2 /3 -generation ALK TKIs. Physician's choice of the most recommended next-line systemic treatment (NLST) was captured before and after receival of CGP results; the percentage of cases in which the NLST recommendation has changed was assessed along with the CGP turnaround time (TAT). Patients were divided into groups: patients in whom the NLST was initiated after (group 1) and before (group 2) receival of the CGP results. Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) with NLST were compared between the groups. In 20 eligible patients (median [m]age 63 years [range, 40-89], females 75%, adenocarcinoma 100%, failure of alectinib 90%, FoundationOne Liquid CDx 80%), CGP has altered NLST recommendation in 30% of cases. CGP findings were as follows: ALK mutations 30% (l1171X 10%, G1202R, L1196M, G1269A, G1202R+l1171N+E1210K 5% each), CDKN2A/B mutation/loss 10%, c-met amplification 5%. CGP mTAT was 2.9 weeks [IQR, 2.4-4.4]. mTTD was 11.3 months (95% CI, 2.1-not reached [NR]) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.0-NR) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p-0.34). mOS was 13.2 months (95% CI, 2.9-NR) and 13.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-NR) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p-0.86). CGP has a significant impact on the decision-making process in ALK-rearranged aNSCLC following progression on 2 /3 -generation ALK TKIs.
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X