Loading…
Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy
Pertussis is a common respiratory infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Although most cases occur in developing countries, it is considered endemic globally. The World Health Organization estimates there are 20–40 million cases of pertussis annually. Pertussis vaccines played a piv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical principles and practice 2022-09, Vol.31 (4), p.313-321 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-3f1068eca27dc22fe5918783160e3f364e91002558752433579992398ff0985b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-3f1068eca27dc22fe5918783160e3f364e91002558752433579992398ff0985b3 |
container_end_page | 321 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | Medical principles and practice |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Alghounaim, Mohammad Alsaffar, Zainab Alfraij, Abdulla Bin-Hasan, Saadoun Hussain, Entesar |
description | Pertussis is a common respiratory infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Although most cases occur in developing countries, it is considered endemic globally. The World Health Organization estimates there are 20–40 million cases of pertussis annually. Pertussis vaccines played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of pertussis disease as well as infant morbidity and mortality. Although the two forms of pertussis vaccine are effective, each has its advantages and drawbacks. This review aims to review the current knowledge on pertussis vaccines, emphasizing vaccine effectiveness in different populations within a community. Clinical trials have shown favorable vaccine efficacy with acellular pertussis (aP)vaccine. However, observational and population-level studies showed that introducing at least a single dose of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine within the routine immunization schedule is associated with better disease protection and a longer duration of immunity. On the other hand, wP vaccine is more reactogenic and associated with higher adverse events. Therefore, the selection of vaccine should be weighed against the effectiveness, reactogenicity, and cost-effectiveness. Due to its safety profile, aP vaccine can be offered to wider population groups. Booster adolescent and pregnant immunization programs have been implemented globally to control outbreaks and protect vulnerable infants. Due to the variable effectiveness performance of both vaccines, different countries adopted distinctive immunization programs. Determining the right vaccination approach depends on financial consideration, immunization program infrastructure, adverse event monitoring, and pertussis surveillance in the community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000525468 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_35696990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2900315784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-3f1068eca27dc22fe5918783160e3f364e91002558752433579992398ff0985b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0c1rFTEQAPBQlLa2HryLLPRSD2snyU428VAoj_oBFR-i7TGkeZN2677NM9kV-t-b8uqi4ikD88swH4y94PCGczQnAIACG6V32D5vhKyBI39SYuC8brHle-xZzneFaSlhl-1JVEYZA_tscXUbe6oX1PeVG1bVmS_R1LtULSmNU85dri6d991Ab6svFHryYxeHXMWhOg-h887fH7KnwfWZnj--B-zbu_Oviw_1xef3HxdnF7VHbsZaBg5Kk3eiXXkhAqHhutWSKyAZpGrIcACBqFsUjZTYGmOENDoEMBqv5QE73dbdTNdrWnkaxuR6u0nd2qV7G11n_84M3a29iT-taTQahaXA8WOBFH9MlEe77vLDwG6gOGUrVKuwbFJAoUf_0Ls4paGMZ4UBkBxb3RT1eqt8ijknCnMzHOzDaex8mmJf_dn9LH_fooCXW_DdpRtKM5j_H_03_Wm53Aq7WQX5Cw5Pm0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900315784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Karger Open Access</source><creator>Alghounaim, Mohammad ; Alsaffar, Zainab ; Alfraij, Abdulla ; Bin-Hasan, Saadoun ; Hussain, Entesar</creator><creatorcontrib>Alghounaim, Mohammad ; Alsaffar, Zainab ; Alfraij, Abdulla ; Bin-Hasan, Saadoun ; Hussain, Entesar</creatorcontrib><description>Pertussis is a common respiratory infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Although most cases occur in developing countries, it is considered endemic globally. The World Health Organization estimates there are 20–40 million cases of pertussis annually. Pertussis vaccines played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of pertussis disease as well as infant morbidity and mortality. Although the two forms of pertussis vaccine are effective, each has its advantages and drawbacks. This review aims to review the current knowledge on pertussis vaccines, emphasizing vaccine effectiveness in different populations within a community. Clinical trials have shown favorable vaccine efficacy with acellular pertussis (aP)vaccine. However, observational and population-level studies showed that introducing at least a single dose of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine within the routine immunization schedule is associated with better disease protection and a longer duration of immunity. On the other hand, wP vaccine is more reactogenic and associated with higher adverse events. Therefore, the selection of vaccine should be weighed against the effectiveness, reactogenicity, and cost-effectiveness. Due to its safety profile, aP vaccine can be offered to wider population groups. Booster adolescent and pregnant immunization programs have been implemented globally to control outbreaks and protect vulnerable infants. Due to the variable effectiveness performance of both vaccines, different countries adopted distinctive immunization programs. Determining the right vaccination approach depends on financial consideration, immunization program infrastructure, adverse event monitoring, and pertussis surveillance in the community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-7571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000525468</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35696990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Age groups ; Antigens ; Asymptomatic ; Epidemics ; Epidemiology ; Industrialized nations ; Infections ; Review ; Teenagers ; Vaccines ; Whooping cough</subject><ispartof>Medical principles and practice, 2022-09, Vol.31 (4), p.313-321</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel . This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-3f1068eca27dc22fe5918783160e3f364e91002558752433579992398ff0985b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-3f1068eca27dc22fe5918783160e3f364e91002558752433579992398ff0985b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0179-1716 ; 0000-0003-2791-5836 ; 0000-0002-0665-3761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485965/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9485965/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27635,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35696990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alghounaim, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaffar, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfraij, Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin-Hasan, Saadoun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Entesar</creatorcontrib><title>Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy</title><title>Medical principles and practice</title><addtitle>Med Princ Pract</addtitle><description>Pertussis is a common respiratory infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Although most cases occur in developing countries, it is considered endemic globally. The World Health Organization estimates there are 20–40 million cases of pertussis annually. Pertussis vaccines played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of pertussis disease as well as infant morbidity and mortality. Although the two forms of pertussis vaccine are effective, each has its advantages and drawbacks. This review aims to review the current knowledge on pertussis vaccines, emphasizing vaccine effectiveness in different populations within a community. Clinical trials have shown favorable vaccine efficacy with acellular pertussis (aP)vaccine. However, observational and population-level studies showed that introducing at least a single dose of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine within the routine immunization schedule is associated with better disease protection and a longer duration of immunity. On the other hand, wP vaccine is more reactogenic and associated with higher adverse events. Therefore, the selection of vaccine should be weighed against the effectiveness, reactogenicity, and cost-effectiveness. Due to its safety profile, aP vaccine can be offered to wider population groups. Booster adolescent and pregnant immunization programs have been implemented globally to control outbreaks and protect vulnerable infants. Due to the variable effectiveness performance of both vaccines, different countries adopted distinctive immunization programs. Determining the right vaccination approach depends on financial consideration, immunization program infrastructure, adverse event monitoring, and pertussis surveillance in the community.</description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><issn>1011-7571</issn><issn>1423-0151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M--</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0c1rFTEQAPBQlLa2HryLLPRSD2snyU428VAoj_oBFR-i7TGkeZN2677NM9kV-t-b8uqi4ikD88swH4y94PCGczQnAIACG6V32D5vhKyBI39SYuC8brHle-xZzneFaSlhl-1JVEYZA_tscXUbe6oX1PeVG1bVmS_R1LtULSmNU85dri6d991Ab6svFHryYxeHXMWhOg-h887fH7KnwfWZnj--B-zbu_Oviw_1xef3HxdnF7VHbsZaBg5Kk3eiXXkhAqHhutWSKyAZpGrIcACBqFsUjZTYGmOENDoEMBqv5QE73dbdTNdrWnkaxuR6u0nd2qV7G11n_84M3a29iT-taTQahaXA8WOBFH9MlEe77vLDwG6gOGUrVKuwbFJAoUf_0Ls4paGMZ4UBkBxb3RT1eqt8ijknCnMzHOzDaex8mmJf_dn9LH_fooCXW_DdpRtKM5j_H_03_Wm53Aq7WQX5Cw5Pm0g</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Alghounaim, Mohammad</creator><creator>Alsaffar, Zainab</creator><creator>Alfraij, Abdulla</creator><creator>Bin-Hasan, Saadoun</creator><creator>Hussain, Entesar</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>M--</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0179-1716</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2791-5836</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-3761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy</title><author>Alghounaim, Mohammad ; Alsaffar, Zainab ; Alfraij, Abdulla ; Bin-Hasan, Saadoun ; Hussain, Entesar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-3f1068eca27dc22fe5918783160e3f364e91002558752433579992398ff0985b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alghounaim, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaffar, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfraij, Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin-Hasan, Saadoun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Entesar</creatorcontrib><collection>Karger Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical principles and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alghounaim, Mohammad</au><au>Alsaffar, Zainab</au><au>Alfraij, Abdulla</au><au>Bin-Hasan, Saadoun</au><au>Hussain, Entesar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy</atitle><jtitle>Medical principles and practice</jtitle><addtitle>Med Princ Pract</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>313-321</pages><issn>1011-7571</issn><eissn>1423-0151</eissn><abstract>Pertussis is a common respiratory infection caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Although most cases occur in developing countries, it is considered endemic globally. The World Health Organization estimates there are 20–40 million cases of pertussis annually. Pertussis vaccines played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of pertussis disease as well as infant morbidity and mortality. Although the two forms of pertussis vaccine are effective, each has its advantages and drawbacks. This review aims to review the current knowledge on pertussis vaccines, emphasizing vaccine effectiveness in different populations within a community. Clinical trials have shown favorable vaccine efficacy with acellular pertussis (aP)vaccine. However, observational and population-level studies showed that introducing at least a single dose of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine within the routine immunization schedule is associated with better disease protection and a longer duration of immunity. On the other hand, wP vaccine is more reactogenic and associated with higher adverse events. Therefore, the selection of vaccine should be weighed against the effectiveness, reactogenicity, and cost-effectiveness. Due to its safety profile, aP vaccine can be offered to wider population groups. Booster adolescent and pregnant immunization programs have been implemented globally to control outbreaks and protect vulnerable infants. Due to the variable effectiveness performance of both vaccines, different countries adopted distinctive immunization programs. Determining the right vaccination approach depends on financial consideration, immunization program infrastructure, adverse event monitoring, and pertussis surveillance in the community.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>35696990</pmid><doi>10.1159/000525468</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0179-1716</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2791-5836</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-3761</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1011-7571 |
ispartof | Medical principles and practice, 2022-09, Vol.31 (4), p.313-321 |
issn | 1011-7571 1423-0151 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_35696990 |
source | PubMed Central; Karger Open Access |
subjects | Age groups Antigens Asymptomatic Epidemics Epidemiology Industrialized nations Infections Review Teenagers Vaccines Whooping cough |
title | Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Whole-Cell%20and%20Acellular%20Pertussis%20Vaccine:%20Reflections%20on%20Efficacy&rft.jtitle=Medical%20principles%20and%20practice&rft.au=Alghounaim,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=313-321&rft.issn=1011-7571&rft.eissn=1423-0151&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000525468&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2900315784%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-3f1068eca27dc22fe5918783160e3f364e91002558752433579992398ff0985b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900315784&rft_id=info:pmid/35696990&rfr_iscdi=true |