Loading…

Dopamine D 2/3 Receptor Availabilities in Striatal and Extrastriatal Regions of the Adult Human Brain: Comparison of Four Methods of Analysis

Values of binding potentials (BP ) of dopamine D receptors differ in different regions of the brain, but we do not know with certainty how much of this difference is due either to different receptor numbers, or to different affinities of tracers to the receptors, or to both. We tested the claim that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurochemical research 2023-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1517
Main Authors: Khodaii, Javad, Nomura, Yoshiyuki, Chang, Natalie Hong Siu, Wong, Dean F, Møller, Arne, Gjedde, Albert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1517
container_title Neurochemical research
container_volume 48
creator Khodaii, Javad
Nomura, Yoshiyuki
Chang, Natalie Hong Siu
Wong, Dean F
Møller, Arne
Gjedde, Albert
description Values of binding potentials (BP ) of dopamine D receptors differ in different regions of the brain, but we do not know with certainty how much of this difference is due either to different receptor numbers, or to different affinities of tracers to the receptors, or to both. We tested the claim that both striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D receptor availabilities vary with age in vivo in humans by determining the values of BP of the specific radioligand [ C]raclopride. We determined values of BP in striatal and extrastriatal volumes-of-interest (VOI) with the same specific receptor radioligand. We estimated values of BP in individual voxels of brains of healthy volunteers in vivo, and we obtained regional averages of VOI by dynamic positron emission tomography (PET). We calculated average values of BP in caudate nucleus and putamen of striatum, and in frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal cortices of the forebrain, by means of four methods, including the ERLiBiRD (Estimation of Reversible Ligand Binding and Receptor Density) method, the tissue reference methods of Logan and Logan-Ichise, respectively, and the SRTM (Simplified Reference Tissue Method). Voxelwise generation of parametric maps of values of BP used the multi-linear regression version of SRTM. Age-dependent changes of the binding potential presented with an inverted U-shape with peak binding potentials reached between the ages of 20 and 30. The estimates of BP declined significantly with age after the peak in both striatal and extrastriatal regions, as determined by all four methods, with the greatest decline observed in posterior (occipital and parietal) cortices (14% per decade) and the lowest decline in caudate nucleus (3% per decade). The sites of the greatest declines are of particular interest because of the clinical implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11064-022-03825-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_36525123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36525123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_365251233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzslKA0EUBdBCEBOHH3Ah7wfK1JDuqLs2A9m4ie7Di10xT2po6lWL-Qj_WSNm7erC5Vy4QlxrdauVmoxYa1WPpTJGKntnKjk-EUNdTays75UdiHPmd6V-qNFnYmDrylTa2KH4mqUOA0UHMzAjCyv36rqSMjQfSB435KmQY6AIzyUTFvSAsYX5Z8nIx2bl3ihFhrSFsnPQtL0vsOwDRnjMSPEBpil0mIlTPKBF6jM8ubJL7e-oiej3THwpTrfo2V395YW4WcxfpkvZ9Zvg2nWXKWDer4__7b_gGxxHVqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dopamine D 2/3 Receptor Availabilities in Striatal and Extrastriatal Regions of the Adult Human Brain: Comparison of Four Methods of Analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Khodaii, Javad ; Nomura, Yoshiyuki ; Chang, Natalie Hong Siu ; Wong, Dean F ; Møller, Arne ; Gjedde, Albert</creator><creatorcontrib>Khodaii, Javad ; Nomura, Yoshiyuki ; Chang, Natalie Hong Siu ; Wong, Dean F ; Møller, Arne ; Gjedde, Albert</creatorcontrib><description>Values of binding potentials (BP ) of dopamine D receptors differ in different regions of the brain, but we do not know with certainty how much of this difference is due either to different receptor numbers, or to different affinities of tracers to the receptors, or to both. We tested the claim that both striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D receptor availabilities vary with age in vivo in humans by determining the values of BP of the specific radioligand [ C]raclopride. We determined values of BP in striatal and extrastriatal volumes-of-interest (VOI) with the same specific receptor radioligand. We estimated values of BP in individual voxels of brains of healthy volunteers in vivo, and we obtained regional averages of VOI by dynamic positron emission tomography (PET). We calculated average values of BP in caudate nucleus and putamen of striatum, and in frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal cortices of the forebrain, by means of four methods, including the ERLiBiRD (Estimation of Reversible Ligand Binding and Receptor Density) method, the tissue reference methods of Logan and Logan-Ichise, respectively, and the SRTM (Simplified Reference Tissue Method). Voxelwise generation of parametric maps of values of BP used the multi-linear regression version of SRTM. Age-dependent changes of the binding potential presented with an inverted U-shape with peak binding potentials reached between the ages of 20 and 30. The estimates of BP declined significantly with age after the peak in both striatal and extrastriatal regions, as determined by all four methods, with the greatest decline observed in posterior (occipital and parietal) cortices (14% per decade) and the lowest decline in caudate nucleus (3% per decade). The sites of the greatest declines are of particular interest because of the clinical implications.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6903</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11064-022-03825-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36525123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - metabolism ; Corpus Striatum - diagnostic imaging ; Corpus Striatum - metabolism ; Dopamine - metabolism ; Humans ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Raclopride ; Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism ; Receptors, Dopamine D3 - metabolism ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neurochemical research, 2023-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1517</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36525123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khodaii, Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Natalie Hong Siu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Dean F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gjedde, Albert</creatorcontrib><title>Dopamine D 2/3 Receptor Availabilities in Striatal and Extrastriatal Regions of the Adult Human Brain: Comparison of Four Methods of Analysis</title><title>Neurochemical research</title><addtitle>Neurochem Res</addtitle><description>Values of binding potentials (BP ) of dopamine D receptors differ in different regions of the brain, but we do not know with certainty how much of this difference is due either to different receptor numbers, or to different affinities of tracers to the receptors, or to both. We tested the claim that both striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D receptor availabilities vary with age in vivo in humans by determining the values of BP of the specific radioligand [ C]raclopride. We determined values of BP in striatal and extrastriatal volumes-of-interest (VOI) with the same specific receptor radioligand. We estimated values of BP in individual voxels of brains of healthy volunteers in vivo, and we obtained regional averages of VOI by dynamic positron emission tomography (PET). We calculated average values of BP in caudate nucleus and putamen of striatum, and in frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal cortices of the forebrain, by means of four methods, including the ERLiBiRD (Estimation of Reversible Ligand Binding and Receptor Density) method, the tissue reference methods of Logan and Logan-Ichise, respectively, and the SRTM (Simplified Reference Tissue Method). Voxelwise generation of parametric maps of values of BP used the multi-linear regression version of SRTM. Age-dependent changes of the binding potential presented with an inverted U-shape with peak binding potentials reached between the ages of 20 and 30. The estimates of BP declined significantly with age after the peak in both striatal and extrastriatal regions, as determined by all four methods, with the greatest decline observed in posterior (occipital and parietal) cortices (14% per decade) and the lowest decline in caudate nucleus (3% per decade). The sites of the greatest declines are of particular interest because of the clinical implications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Corpus Striatum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Corpus Striatum - metabolism</subject><subject>Dopamine - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Raclopride</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D3 - metabolism</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1573-6903</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFzslKA0EUBdBCEBOHH3Ah7wfK1JDuqLs2A9m4ie7Di10xT2po6lWL-Qj_WSNm7erC5Vy4QlxrdauVmoxYa1WPpTJGKntnKjk-EUNdTays75UdiHPmd6V-qNFnYmDrylTa2KH4mqUOA0UHMzAjCyv36rqSMjQfSB435KmQY6AIzyUTFvSAsYX5Z8nIx2bl3ihFhrSFsnPQtL0vsOwDRnjMSPEBpil0mIlTPKBF6jM8ubJL7e-oiej3THwpTrfo2V395YW4WcxfpkvZ9Zvg2nWXKWDer4__7b_gGxxHVqU</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Khodaii, Javad</creator><creator>Nomura, Yoshiyuki</creator><creator>Chang, Natalie Hong Siu</creator><creator>Wong, Dean F</creator><creator>Møller, Arne</creator><creator>Gjedde, Albert</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Dopamine D 2/3 Receptor Availabilities in Striatal and Extrastriatal Regions of the Adult Human Brain: Comparison of Four Methods of Analysis</title><author>Khodaii, Javad ; Nomura, Yoshiyuki ; Chang, Natalie Hong Siu ; Wong, Dean F ; Møller, Arne ; Gjedde, Albert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_365251233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Corpus Striatum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Corpus Striatum - metabolism</topic><topic>Dopamine - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Raclopride</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D3 - metabolism</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khodaii, Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Natalie Hong Siu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Dean F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gjedde, Albert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Neurochemical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khodaii, Javad</au><au>Nomura, Yoshiyuki</au><au>Chang, Natalie Hong Siu</au><au>Wong, Dean F</au><au>Møller, Arne</au><au>Gjedde, Albert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dopamine D 2/3 Receptor Availabilities in Striatal and Extrastriatal Regions of the Adult Human Brain: Comparison of Four Methods of Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Neurochemical research</jtitle><addtitle>Neurochem Res</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1517</spage><pages>1517-</pages><eissn>1573-6903</eissn><abstract>Values of binding potentials (BP ) of dopamine D receptors differ in different regions of the brain, but we do not know with certainty how much of this difference is due either to different receptor numbers, or to different affinities of tracers to the receptors, or to both. We tested the claim that both striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D receptor availabilities vary with age in vivo in humans by determining the values of BP of the specific radioligand [ C]raclopride. We determined values of BP in striatal and extrastriatal volumes-of-interest (VOI) with the same specific receptor radioligand. We estimated values of BP in individual voxels of brains of healthy volunteers in vivo, and we obtained regional averages of VOI by dynamic positron emission tomography (PET). We calculated average values of BP in caudate nucleus and putamen of striatum, and in frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal cortices of the forebrain, by means of four methods, including the ERLiBiRD (Estimation of Reversible Ligand Binding and Receptor Density) method, the tissue reference methods of Logan and Logan-Ichise, respectively, and the SRTM (Simplified Reference Tissue Method). Voxelwise generation of parametric maps of values of BP used the multi-linear regression version of SRTM. Age-dependent changes of the binding potential presented with an inverted U-shape with peak binding potentials reached between the ages of 20 and 30. The estimates of BP declined significantly with age after the peak in both striatal and extrastriatal regions, as determined by all four methods, with the greatest decline observed in posterior (occipital and parietal) cortices (14% per decade) and the lowest decline in caudate nucleus (3% per decade). The sites of the greatest declines are of particular interest because of the clinical implications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>36525123</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11064-022-03825-4</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1573-6903
ispartof Neurochemical research, 2023-05, Vol.48 (5), p.1517
issn 1573-6903
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_36525123
source Springer Nature
subjects Adult
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - metabolism
Corpus Striatum - diagnostic imaging
Corpus Striatum - metabolism
Dopamine - metabolism
Humans
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Raclopride
Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism
Receptors, Dopamine D3 - metabolism
Young Adult
title Dopamine D 2/3 Receptor Availabilities in Striatal and Extrastriatal Regions of the Adult Human Brain: Comparison of Four Methods of Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A29%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dopamine%20D%202/3%20Receptor%20Availabilities%20in%20Striatal%20and%20Extrastriatal%20Regions%20of%20the%20Adult%20Human%20Brain:%20Comparison%20of%20Four%20Methods%20of%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Neurochemical%20research&rft.au=Khodaii,%20Javad&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1517&rft.pages=1517-&rft.eissn=1573-6903&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11064-022-03825-4&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E36525123%3C/pubmed%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_365251233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36525123&rfr_iscdi=true