Loading…

Structural basis for the mechanism of interaction of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.640.2 variant RBD with the host receptors hACE2 and GRP78

The inflicted chaos instigated by the SARS-CoV-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) globally continues with the emergence of novel variants. The current global outbreak is aggravated by the manifestation of novel variants, which affect the effectiveness of the vaccine, attachment with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics 2024-03, Vol.42 (4), p.2034-2042
Main Authors: Shafiq, Athar, Khalid, Ujala, Abdur Rehman, Umar, Abdullah Almuqri, Eman, Muddassir, Maria, Ahmad, Sajjad, Khan, Muhammad Idrees, Khan, Abbas, Wei, Dong-Qing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The inflicted chaos instigated by the SARS-CoV-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) globally continues with the emergence of novel variants. The current global outbreak is aggravated by the manifestation of novel variants, which affect the effectiveness of the vaccine, attachment with hACE2 (human Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) and immune evasion. Recently, a new variant named University Hospital Institute (IHU) (B.1.640.2) was reported in France in November 2021 and is spreading globally affecting public healthcare. The B.1.640.2 SARS-CoV-2 strain revealed 14 mutations and 9 deletions in spike protein. Thus, it is important to understand how these variations in the spike protein impact the communication with the host. A protein coupling approach along with molecular simulation protocols was used to interpret the variation in the binding of the wild type (WT) and B.1.640.2 variant with hACE2 and Glucose-regulating protein 78 (GRP78) receptors. The initial docking scores revealed a stronger binding of the B.1.640.2-RBD with both the hACE2 and GRP78. To further understand the crucial dynamic changes, we looked at the structural and dynamic characteristics and also explored the variations in the bonding networks between the WT and B.1.640.2-RBD (receptor-binding domain) in association with hACE2 and GRP78, respectively. Our findings revealed that the variant complex demonstrated distinct dynamic properties in contrast to the wild type due to the acquired mutations. Finally, to provide conclusive evidence on the higher binding by the B.1.640.2 variant the TBE was computed for each complex. For the WT with hACE2 the TBE was quantified to be-61.38 ± 0.96 kcal/mol and for B.1.640.2 variant the TBE was estimated to be −70.47 ± 1.00 kcal/mol. For the WT-RBD-GRP78 the TBE -was computed to be 32.32 ± 0.56 kcal/mol and for the B.1.640.2-RBD a TBE of −50.39 ± 0.88 kcal/mol was reported. This show that these mutations are the basis for higher binding and infectivity produced by B.1.640.2 variant and can be targeted for drug designing against it. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma
ISSN:0739-1102
1538-0254
DOI:10.1080/07391102.2023.2220053