Loading…
Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging
Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emis...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023-08, Vol.154 (2), p.709-720 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3 |
container_end_page | 720 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 709 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 154 |
creator | Lewis, James D. |
description | Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/10.0020568 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37550237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2847747509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAyEURYnR2Pqx8QcYlkZFgWFmYGmMX4nGja4nFB4VM4UKU5Nu_O3StHXp6ubxTk54F6ETRq8Y4-y6JKWc1o3cQWNWc0pkzcUuGlNKGRGqaUboIOfPMtayUvtoVLV1TXnVjtHPS7TQk4nOYPE8gfVm8DHg6HAcojZxkQdvMMx8zqv3Hr6hv8Qh-gzbQQeLs58G3ZMhkvUq6aLBdpF8mOLBz4DkZTAfKYZixPobkp6W1RHac7rPcLzJQ_R-f_d2-0ieXx-ebm-eial4NRDBLGWSggGnFWsmrq2ok04wkK6plWoUAKPQWiGdagWTnAOfVAaUFsIxWx2is7V3nuLXAvLQlYMM9L0OUD7UcSnaVrQ1VQU9X6MmxZwTuG6e_EynZcdot-p7lZu-C3y68S4mM7B_6LbgAlysgWz8sOok_Kf7BTPziec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847747509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Lewis, James D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, James D.</creatorcontrib><description>Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0020568</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37550237</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-08, Vol.154 (2), p.709-720</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><rights>2023 Acoustical Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, James D.</creatorcontrib><title>Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAyEURYnR2Pqx8QcYlkZFgWFmYGmMX4nGja4nFB4VM4UKU5Nu_O3StHXp6ubxTk54F6ETRq8Y4-y6JKWc1o3cQWNWc0pkzcUuGlNKGRGqaUboIOfPMtayUvtoVLV1TXnVjtHPS7TQk4nOYPE8gfVm8DHg6HAcojZxkQdvMMx8zqv3Hr6hv8Qh-gzbQQeLs58G3ZMhkvUq6aLBdpF8mOLBz4DkZTAfKYZixPobkp6W1RHac7rPcLzJQ_R-f_d2-0ieXx-ebm-eial4NRDBLGWSggGnFWsmrq2ok04wkK6plWoUAKPQWiGdagWTnAOfVAaUFsIxWx2is7V3nuLXAvLQlYMM9L0OUD7UcSnaVrQ1VQU9X6MmxZwTuG6e_EynZcdot-p7lZu-C3y68S4mM7B_6LbgAlysgWz8sOok_Kf7BTPziec</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Lewis, James D.</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging</title><author>Lewis, James D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, James D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, James D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>709</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>709-720</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37550237</pmid><doi>10.1121/10.0020568</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-08, Vol.154 (2), p.709-720 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_37550237 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
title | Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A33%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model-based%20prediction%20of%20otoacoustic%20emission%20level,%20noise%20level,%20and%20signal-to-noise%20ratio%20during%20time-synchronous%20averaging&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Lewis,%20James%20D.&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=709&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=709-720&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0020568&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2847747509%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847747509&rft_id=info:pmid/37550237&rfr_iscdi=true |