Loading…

Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging

Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023-08, Vol.154 (2), p.709-720
Main Author: Lewis, James D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3
container_end_page 720
container_issue 2
container_start_page 709
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 154
creator Lewis, James D.
description Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0020568
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37550237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2847747509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAyEURYnR2Pqx8QcYlkZFgWFmYGmMX4nGja4nFB4VM4UKU5Nu_O3StHXp6ubxTk54F6ETRq8Y4-y6JKWc1o3cQWNWc0pkzcUuGlNKGRGqaUboIOfPMtayUvtoVLV1TXnVjtHPS7TQk4nOYPE8gfVm8DHg6HAcojZxkQdvMMx8zqv3Hr6hv8Qh-gzbQQeLs58G3ZMhkvUq6aLBdpF8mOLBz4DkZTAfKYZixPobkp6W1RHac7rPcLzJQ_R-f_d2-0ieXx-ebm-eial4NRDBLGWSggGnFWsmrq2ok04wkK6plWoUAKPQWiGdagWTnAOfVAaUFsIxWx2is7V3nuLXAvLQlYMM9L0OUD7UcSnaVrQ1VQU9X6MmxZwTuG6e_EynZcdot-p7lZu-C3y68S4mM7B_6LbgAlysgWz8sOok_Kf7BTPziec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847747509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Lewis, James D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, James D.</creatorcontrib><description>Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0020568</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37550237</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-08, Vol.154 (2), p.709-720</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><rights>2023 Acoustical Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, James D.</creatorcontrib><title>Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAyEURYnR2Pqx8QcYlkZFgWFmYGmMX4nGja4nFB4VM4UKU5Nu_O3StHXp6ubxTk54F6ETRq8Y4-y6JKWc1o3cQWNWc0pkzcUuGlNKGRGqaUboIOfPMtayUvtoVLV1TXnVjtHPS7TQk4nOYPE8gfVm8DHg6HAcojZxkQdvMMx8zqv3Hr6hv8Qh-gzbQQeLs58G3ZMhkvUq6aLBdpF8mOLBz4DkZTAfKYZixPobkp6W1RHac7rPcLzJQ_R-f_d2-0ieXx-ebm-eial4NRDBLGWSggGnFWsmrq2ok04wkK6plWoUAKPQWiGdagWTnAOfVAaUFsIxWx2is7V3nuLXAvLQlYMM9L0OUD7UcSnaVrQ1VQU9X6MmxZwTuG6e_EynZcdot-p7lZu-C3y68S4mM7B_6LbgAlysgWz8sOok_Kf7BTPziec</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Lewis, James D.</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging</title><author>Lewis, James D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, James D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, James D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>709</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>709-720</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37550237</pmid><doi>10.1121/10.0020568</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-08, Vol.154 (2), p.709-720
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_37550237
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
title Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A33%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model-based%20prediction%20of%20otoacoustic%20emission%20level,%20noise%20level,%20and%20signal-to-noise%20ratio%20during%20time-synchronous%20averaging&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Lewis,%20James%20D.&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=709&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=709-720&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0020568&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2847747509%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-41d0180ecefa916bf730f8f41e8f659969ee10e7d48f9741822e2b3ce9a44f1d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847747509&rft_id=info:pmid/37550237&rfr_iscdi=true