Loading…
The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries
This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health systems and reform 2023-12, Vol.9 (3), p.2273051 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2273051 |
container_title | Health systems and reform |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Norheim, Ole F. Watkins, David A. |
description | This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to create comprehensive service sets considering overall population health needs and available resources. Challenges in LMICs include limited local data and technical capacity, leading to reliance on cost-effectiveness estimates from other settings. We suggest a practical approach by combining HTA and HBP elements through a hybrid or compartmentalized method. This approach sets differentiated cost-effectiveness thresholds for specific healthcare platforms or programs (e.g., primary care or essential surgery), aligning priority-setting with organizational considerations, ethics, and implementation strategies. Strong institutions and academic support are vital for evidence-informed priority-setting processes. In summary, HTA can play a pivotal role in designing HBPs for UHC in LMICs, and a compartmentalized approach can enhance priority-setting while considering budget constraints and equity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37948391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fb8baf6f95924eea87f2bea3391836a7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2889243293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhkdVUUGUR2jlZTeT-jYee1caaBMpFQily8ryeI6DqWdM7YkQb1-HhCxZ2Tr6Lzrnq6pPBM8IlvgrZVRKgfmMYspmlLYMN-Rddbab11JQ_P74x_y0usj5AWNMeCOIYB-qU9YqLpkiZ9Wf9T2guxgARYcW60vkYkLXOcM4eRPQAkyY7tF3GMH5Cd0a-9dsAF1B9psR-RGt4hMqjl--7wPUy9HGAdA8bscpecgfqxNnQoaLw3te_f5xvZ4v6tXNz-X8clVb3qqpdj2TDW0AOkdxq5wikhvZ8k7YrpfWctWwzrVdgwmIsiwzglgDireicT3G7Lxa7nP7aB70Y_KDSc86Gq9fBjFttEmTtwG062RnnHCqUZQDlBpHOzCsXEMyYdqS9WWf9Zjivy3kSQ8-WwjBjBC3WZfLFyejihVps5faFHNO4I7VBOsdKP0KSu9A6QOo4vt8qNh2A_RH1yuWIvi2F_ix8BjMU0yh15N5DjG5ZEbrs2Zvd_wHElCf9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889243293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals</source><creator>Norheim, Ole F. ; Watkins, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Norheim, Ole F. ; Watkins, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to create comprehensive service sets considering overall population health needs and available resources. Challenges in LMICs include limited local data and technical capacity, leading to reliance on cost-effectiveness estimates from other settings. We suggest a practical approach by combining HTA and HBP elements through a hybrid or compartmentalized method. This approach sets differentiated cost-effectiveness thresholds for specific healthcare platforms or programs (e.g., primary care or essential surgery), aligning priority-setting with organizational considerations, ethics, and implementation strategies. Strong institutions and academic support are vital for evidence-informed priority-setting processes. In summary, HTA can play a pivotal role in designing HBPs for UHC in LMICs, and a compartmentalized approach can enhance priority-setting while considering budget constraints and equity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8604</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-8620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37948391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Budgets ; cost-effectiveness ; Delivery of Health Care ; Developing Countries ; equity ; health benefit packages ; health technology assessment ; Humans ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical ; Universal Health Coverage</subject><ispartof>Health systems and reform, 2023-12, Vol.9 (3), p.2273051</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5748-5956</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27483,27905,27906,59122,59123</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37948391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Norheim, Ole F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries</title><title>Health systems and reform</title><addtitle>Health Syst Reform</addtitle><description>This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to create comprehensive service sets considering overall population health needs and available resources. Challenges in LMICs include limited local data and technical capacity, leading to reliance on cost-effectiveness estimates from other settings. We suggest a practical approach by combining HTA and HBP elements through a hybrid or compartmentalized method. This approach sets differentiated cost-effectiveness thresholds for specific healthcare platforms or programs (e.g., primary care or essential surgery), aligning priority-setting with organizational considerations, ethics, and implementation strategies. Strong institutions and academic support are vital for evidence-informed priority-setting processes. In summary, HTA can play a pivotal role in designing HBPs for UHC in LMICs, and a compartmentalized approach can enhance priority-setting while considering budget constraints and equity.</description><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>equity</subject><subject>health benefit packages</subject><subject>health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical</subject><subject>Universal Health Coverage</subject><issn>2328-8604</issn><issn>2328-8620</issn><issn>2328-8620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhkdVUUGUR2jlZTeT-jYee1caaBMpFQily8ryeI6DqWdM7YkQb1-HhCxZ2Tr6Lzrnq6pPBM8IlvgrZVRKgfmMYspmlLYMN-Rddbab11JQ_P74x_y0usj5AWNMeCOIYB-qU9YqLpkiZ9Wf9T2guxgARYcW60vkYkLXOcM4eRPQAkyY7tF3GMH5Cd0a-9dsAF1B9psR-RGt4hMqjl--7wPUy9HGAdA8bscpecgfqxNnQoaLw3te_f5xvZ4v6tXNz-X8clVb3qqpdj2TDW0AOkdxq5wikhvZ8k7YrpfWctWwzrVdgwmIsiwzglgDireicT3G7Lxa7nP7aB70Y_KDSc86Gq9fBjFttEmTtwG062RnnHCqUZQDlBpHOzCsXEMyYdqS9WWf9Zjivy3kSQ8-WwjBjBC3WZfLFyejihVps5faFHNO4I7VBOsdKP0KSu9A6QOo4vt8qNh2A_RH1yuWIvi2F_ix8BjMU0yh15N5DjG5ZEbrs2Zvd_wHElCf9g</recordid><startdate>20231231</startdate><enddate>20231231</enddate><creator>Norheim, Ole F.</creator><creator>Watkins, David A.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-5956</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231231</creationdate><title>The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries</title><author>Norheim, Ole F. ; Watkins, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>equity</topic><topic>health benefit packages</topic><topic>health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical</topic><topic>Universal Health Coverage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Norheim, Ole F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Health systems and reform</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Norheim, Ole F.</au><au>Watkins, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries</atitle><jtitle>Health systems and reform</jtitle><addtitle>Health Syst Reform</addtitle><date>2023-12-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2273051</spage><pages>2273051-</pages><issn>2328-8604</issn><issn>2328-8620</issn><eissn>2328-8620</eissn><abstract>This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to create comprehensive service sets considering overall population health needs and available resources. Challenges in LMICs include limited local data and technical capacity, leading to reliance on cost-effectiveness estimates from other settings. We suggest a practical approach by combining HTA and HBP elements through a hybrid or compartmentalized method. This approach sets differentiated cost-effectiveness thresholds for specific healthcare platforms or programs (e.g., primary care or essential surgery), aligning priority-setting with organizational considerations, ethics, and implementation strategies. Strong institutions and academic support are vital for evidence-informed priority-setting processes. In summary, HTA can play a pivotal role in designing HBPs for UHC in LMICs, and a compartmentalized approach can enhance priority-setting while considering budget constraints and equity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>37948391</pmid><doi>10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-5956</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2328-8604 |
ispartof | Health systems and reform, 2023-12, Vol.9 (3), p.2273051 |
issn | 2328-8604 2328-8620 2328-8620 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_37948391 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals |
subjects | Budgets cost-effectiveness Delivery of Health Care Developing Countries equity health benefit packages health technology assessment Humans Technology Assessment, Biomedical Universal Health Coverage |
title | The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A30%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20HTA%20for%20Essential%20Health%20Benefit%20Package%20Design%20in%20Low%20or%20Middle-Income%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Health%20systems%20and%20reform&rft.au=Norheim,%20Ole%20F.&rft.date=2023-12-31&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2273051&rft.pages=2273051-&rft.issn=2328-8604&rft.eissn=2328-8620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2889243293%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889243293&rft_id=info:pmid/37948391&rfr_iscdi=true |