Loading…

The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries

This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health systems and reform 2023-12, Vol.9 (3), p.2273051
Main Authors: Norheim, Ole F., Watkins, David A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2273051
container_title Health systems and reform
container_volume 9
creator Norheim, Ole F.
Watkins, David A.
description This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to create comprehensive service sets considering overall population health needs and available resources. Challenges in LMICs include limited local data and technical capacity, leading to reliance on cost-effectiveness estimates from other settings. We suggest a practical approach by combining HTA and HBP elements through a hybrid or compartmentalized method. This approach sets differentiated cost-effectiveness thresholds for specific healthcare platforms or programs (e.g., primary care or essential surgery), aligning priority-setting with organizational considerations, ethics, and implementation strategies. Strong institutions and academic support are vital for evidence-informed priority-setting processes. In summary, HTA can play a pivotal role in designing HBPs for UHC in LMICs, and a compartmentalized approach can enhance priority-setting while considering budget constraints and equity.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37948391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fb8baf6f95924eea87f2bea3391836a7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2889243293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhkdVUUGUR2jlZTeT-jYee1caaBMpFQily8ryeI6DqWdM7YkQb1-HhCxZ2Tr6Lzrnq6pPBM8IlvgrZVRKgfmMYspmlLYMN-Rddbab11JQ_P74x_y0usj5AWNMeCOIYB-qU9YqLpkiZ9Wf9T2guxgARYcW60vkYkLXOcM4eRPQAkyY7tF3GMH5Cd0a-9dsAF1B9psR-RGt4hMqjl--7wPUy9HGAdA8bscpecgfqxNnQoaLw3te_f5xvZ4v6tXNz-X8clVb3qqpdj2TDW0AOkdxq5wikhvZ8k7YrpfWctWwzrVdgwmIsiwzglgDireicT3G7Lxa7nP7aB70Y_KDSc86Gq9fBjFttEmTtwG062RnnHCqUZQDlBpHOzCsXEMyYdqS9WWf9Zjivy3kSQ8-WwjBjBC3WZfLFyejihVps5faFHNO4I7VBOsdKP0KSu9A6QOo4vt8qNh2A_RH1yuWIvi2F_ix8BjMU0yh15N5DjG5ZEbrs2Zvd_wHElCf9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889243293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access Journals</source><creator>Norheim, Ole F. ; Watkins, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Norheim, Ole F. ; Watkins, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to create comprehensive service sets considering overall population health needs and available resources. Challenges in LMICs include limited local data and technical capacity, leading to reliance on cost-effectiveness estimates from other settings. We suggest a practical approach by combining HTA and HBP elements through a hybrid or compartmentalized method. This approach sets differentiated cost-effectiveness thresholds for specific healthcare platforms or programs (e.g., primary care or essential surgery), aligning priority-setting with organizational considerations, ethics, and implementation strategies. Strong institutions and academic support are vital for evidence-informed priority-setting processes. In summary, HTA can play a pivotal role in designing HBPs for UHC in LMICs, and a compartmentalized approach can enhance priority-setting while considering budget constraints and equity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8604</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2328-8620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-8620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37948391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Budgets ; cost-effectiveness ; Delivery of Health Care ; Developing Countries ; equity ; health benefit packages ; health technology assessment ; Humans ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical ; Universal Health Coverage</subject><ispartof>Health systems and reform, 2023-12, Vol.9 (3), p.2273051</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5748-5956</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27483,27905,27906,59122,59123</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37948391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Norheim, Ole F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries</title><title>Health systems and reform</title><addtitle>Health Syst Reform</addtitle><description>This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to create comprehensive service sets considering overall population health needs and available resources. Challenges in LMICs include limited local data and technical capacity, leading to reliance on cost-effectiveness estimates from other settings. We suggest a practical approach by combining HTA and HBP elements through a hybrid or compartmentalized method. This approach sets differentiated cost-effectiveness thresholds for specific healthcare platforms or programs (e.g., primary care or essential surgery), aligning priority-setting with organizational considerations, ethics, and implementation strategies. Strong institutions and academic support are vital for evidence-informed priority-setting processes. In summary, HTA can play a pivotal role in designing HBPs for UHC in LMICs, and a compartmentalized approach can enhance priority-setting while considering budget constraints and equity.</description><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>equity</subject><subject>health benefit packages</subject><subject>health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical</subject><subject>Universal Health Coverage</subject><issn>2328-8604</issn><issn>2328-8620</issn><issn>2328-8620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhkdVUUGUR2jlZTeT-jYee1caaBMpFQily8ryeI6DqWdM7YkQb1-HhCxZ2Tr6Lzrnq6pPBM8IlvgrZVRKgfmMYspmlLYMN-Rddbab11JQ_P74x_y0usj5AWNMeCOIYB-qU9YqLpkiZ9Wf9T2guxgARYcW60vkYkLXOcM4eRPQAkyY7tF3GMH5Cd0a-9dsAF1B9psR-RGt4hMqjl--7wPUy9HGAdA8bscpecgfqxNnQoaLw3te_f5xvZ4v6tXNz-X8clVb3qqpdj2TDW0AOkdxq5wikhvZ8k7YrpfWctWwzrVdgwmIsiwzglgDireicT3G7Lxa7nP7aB70Y_KDSc86Gq9fBjFttEmTtwG062RnnHCqUZQDlBpHOzCsXEMyYdqS9WWf9Zjivy3kSQ8-WwjBjBC3WZfLFyejihVps5faFHNO4I7VBOsdKP0KSu9A6QOo4vt8qNh2A_RH1yuWIvi2F_ix8BjMU0yh15N5DjG5ZEbrs2Zvd_wHElCf9g</recordid><startdate>20231231</startdate><enddate>20231231</enddate><creator>Norheim, Ole F.</creator><creator>Watkins, David A.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-5956</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231231</creationdate><title>The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries</title><author>Norheim, Ole F. ; Watkins, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>equity</topic><topic>health benefit packages</topic><topic>health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical</topic><topic>Universal Health Coverage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Norheim, Ole F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Health systems and reform</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Norheim, Ole F.</au><au>Watkins, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries</atitle><jtitle>Health systems and reform</jtitle><addtitle>Health Syst Reform</addtitle><date>2023-12-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2273051</spage><pages>2273051-</pages><issn>2328-8604</issn><issn>2328-8620</issn><eissn>2328-8620</eissn><abstract>This Commentary explores the relationship between Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Health Benefits Package (HBP) design to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries. It emphasizes that while HTA evaluates individual healthcare interventions, HBP reform aims to create comprehensive service sets considering overall population health needs and available resources. Challenges in LMICs include limited local data and technical capacity, leading to reliance on cost-effectiveness estimates from other settings. We suggest a practical approach by combining HTA and HBP elements through a hybrid or compartmentalized method. This approach sets differentiated cost-effectiveness thresholds for specific healthcare platforms or programs (e.g., primary care or essential surgery), aligning priority-setting with organizational considerations, ethics, and implementation strategies. Strong institutions and academic support are vital for evidence-informed priority-setting processes. In summary, HTA can play a pivotal role in designing HBPs for UHC in LMICs, and a compartmentalized approach can enhance priority-setting while considering budget constraints and equity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>37948391</pmid><doi>10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-5956</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2328-8604
ispartof Health systems and reform, 2023-12, Vol.9 (3), p.2273051
issn 2328-8604
2328-8620
2328-8620
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_37948391
source Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals
subjects Budgets
cost-effectiveness
Delivery of Health Care
Developing Countries
equity
health benefit packages
health technology assessment
Humans
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
Universal Health Coverage
title The Role of HTA for Essential Health Benefit Package Design in Low or Middle-Income Countries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A30%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20HTA%20for%20Essential%20Health%20Benefit%20Package%20Design%20in%20Low%20or%20Middle-Income%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Health%20systems%20and%20reform&rft.au=Norheim,%20Ole%20F.&rft.date=2023-12-31&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2273051&rft.pages=2273051-&rft.issn=2328-8604&rft.eissn=2328-8620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23288604.2023.2273051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2889243293%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-fd38525eebf2079f9184a874b6cbd8cc4953bf7b501e62733a61cae94765fd003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889243293&rft_id=info:pmid/37948391&rfr_iscdi=true