The paradox of haemodialysis: the lived experience of the clocked treatment of chronic illness

• Published in: Health sociology review 2024-01, Vol.33 (1), p.24-42
• Main Authors: Cluley, Victoria, Burton, James O., Hull, Katherine L., Eborall, Helen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Chronic Disease - psychology; Chronic Disease - therapy; Chronic illness; chronic time; crip time; end stage kidney disease; Female; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Kidney Failure, Chronic - psychology; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Dialysis - psychology; time
• ISSN: 1446-1242; 1839-3551
• DOI: 10.1080/14461242.2024.2319189

Studies exploring the relationship between time and chronic illness have generally focused on measurable aspects of time, also known as linear time. Linear time follows a predictable, sequential order of past, present and future; measured using a clock and predicated on normative assumptions. Sociological concepts addressing lifecourse disruption following diagnosis of chronic illness have served to enhance the understanding of lived experience. To understand the nuanced relationship between time and chronic illness, however, requires further exploration. Here, we show how the implicit assumptions of linear time meet in tension with the lived experience of chronic illness. We draw on interviews and photovoice work with people with end-stage kidney disease in receipt of in-centre-daytime haemodialysis to show how the clocked treatment of chronic illness disrupts experiences of time. Drawing on concepts of 'crip' and 'chronic' time we argue that clocked treatment and the lived experience of chronic illness converge at a paradox whereby clocked treatment allows for the continuation of linear time yet limits freedom. We use the concept of 'crip time' to challenge the normative assumptions implicit within linear concepts of time and argue that the understanding of chronic illness and its treatment would benefit from a 'cripped' starting point.