Treatment effect of ultra-pulse dynamic CO 2 laser and comedone extractor in dense comedones: a prospective, randomized, split-face, evaluator-blind, controlled clinical trial

Clearance of comedone is challenging in the treatment of acne, as it is very likely to develop into inflammatory lesions. However, there is lack of effective treatments for dense comedones. Comedone extractor has been widely employed by dermatologists, but the effect is temporary and may cause irrit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lasers in medical science 2024-09, Vol.39 (1), p.233
Main Authors: Yang, Meng-Yao, Qiao, Si-Meng, Ning, Di-Chao, Ding, Yi-Hao, Zeng, Wei-Hui, Wang, Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acne Vulgaris - radiotherapy
Adolescent
Adult
Female
Humans
Lasers, Gas - therapeutic use
Male
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Clearance of comedone is challenging in the treatment of acne, as it is very likely to develop into inflammatory lesions. However, there is lack of effective treatments for dense comedones. Comedone extractor has been widely employed by dermatologists, but the effect is temporary and may cause irritation. CO laser is a potential method for dense comedones, but the efficacy and safety need to be explored. In this single-center, randomized, single-blind, self-controlled study, the faces of patients with dense comedones were randomly assigned into two sides receiving either ultra-pulse dynamic CO laser or comedone extraction at an interval of 2 weeks for 4 sessions. After 4 treatments, the average comedone reduction rate of the CO laser was 64.49%, which was higher than that by the extractor (46.36%) (P < .001). 79.16% of the patients reached over 50% reduction by CO laser, while only 37.5% on extractor treated side reached 50% clearance. Texture index, porphyrin index, red zone, erythema index, and transepidermal water loss decreased after both treatments, and CO laser showed more improvement. There was no difference in hydration index and melanin index between the two treatments. No permanent or severe side effects were observed on both sides. The CO laser showed higher comedone clearance with lower pain scores than the comedone extractor.
ISSN:1435-604X