Loading…

Luteal support after in-vitro fertilization: Crinone 8%, a sustained release vaginal progesterone gel, versus Utrogestan, an oral micronized progesterone

Two progesterone presentations, a vaginal application of 90 mg progesterone per day (Crinone) or 300 mg progesterone administered orally (Utrogestan), were compared for luteal phase support of patients undergoing an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure. A total of 283 patients were randomly alloca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 1996-10, Vol.11 (10), p.2085
Main Authors: Pouly, J L, Bassil, S, Frydman, R, Hedon, B, Nicollet, B, Prada, Y, Antoine, J M, Zambrano, R, Donnez, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2085
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 11
creator Pouly, J L
Bassil, S
Frydman, R
Hedon, B
Nicollet, B
Prada, Y
Antoine, J M
Zambrano, R
Donnez, J
description Two progesterone presentations, a vaginal application of 90 mg progesterone per day (Crinone) or 300 mg progesterone administered orally (Utrogestan), were compared for luteal phase support of patients undergoing an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure. A total of 283 patients were randomly allocated to either treatment. The treatment started within 24 h after the embryo transfer procedure and continued until day 30 in cases of implantation. Efficacy was assessed using the pregnancy and delivery rates. Safety was assessed through specific symptoms and usual safety monitoring. The pregnancy rates per transfer were not significantly different in the Crinone and Utrogestan groups at days 12 (Crinone 35.3%, Utrogestan 29.9%, P = 0.55), 30 (Crinone 28.5%, Utrogestan 25.0%, P = 0.61) and 90 (Crinone 25.9%, Utrogestan 22.9%, P = 0.69). No differences in the spontaneous abortion rates were seen thereafter. The delivery rates (number of deliveries per patient; Crinone 23.0%, Utrogestan 22.2%, P = 1.00), as well as the ratio of newborn babies per embryo transferred (Crinone 11.7%, Utrogestan 11.1%, P = 0.91), were not significantly different. Safety parameters were similar in both groups, except for drowsiness, which was more significantly frequent in the oral progesterone group than in the Crinone group at all time points. No serious adverse events were recorded in this study. The fact that Crinone matches the efficacy of the larger doses of progesterone used orally reflects an advantage of the transvaginal route of administration which avoids the metabolic inactivation of progesterone during its first liver pass.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_8943507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8943507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p206t-643c5e8b34969a9dcaaaf4ad194f43480900b707c6252d54c91d8f1f733690ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkLFOwzAURT2ASil8ApIXtkZyYsex2VAFFKkSC52r1_g5MkqcyHYr0T_hbzFqB6Z3pXvuGd4VmbNKqqIsZXlDbmP8YixHJWdkprTgNWvm5GdzSAg9jYdpGkOiYBMG6nxxdCmM1GJIrncnSG70T3QVnB89UvW4pJA3MYHzaGjAHiEiPULnfLZNYewwZtMf3GG_pEcMGafbdG7AZ4GnY8jw4NrMuVP2_N_dkWsLfcT7y12Q7evL52pdbD7e3lfPm2KqmEyFFLytUe250FKDNi0AWAGm1MIKLhTTjO0b1rSyqitTi1aXRtnSNpxLzdDwBXk4e6fDfkCzm4IbIHzvLi_iv1dqZS8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Luteal support after in-vitro fertilization: Crinone 8%, a sustained release vaginal progesterone gel, versus Utrogestan, an oral micronized progesterone</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Pouly, J L ; Bassil, S ; Frydman, R ; Hedon, B ; Nicollet, B ; Prada, Y ; Antoine, J M ; Zambrano, R ; Donnez, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Pouly, J L ; Bassil, S ; Frydman, R ; Hedon, B ; Nicollet, B ; Prada, Y ; Antoine, J M ; Zambrano, R ; Donnez, J</creatorcontrib><description>Two progesterone presentations, a vaginal application of 90 mg progesterone per day (Crinone) or 300 mg progesterone administered orally (Utrogestan), were compared for luteal phase support of patients undergoing an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure. A total of 283 patients were randomly allocated to either treatment. The treatment started within 24 h after the embryo transfer procedure and continued until day 30 in cases of implantation. Efficacy was assessed using the pregnancy and delivery rates. Safety was assessed through specific symptoms and usual safety monitoring. The pregnancy rates per transfer were not significantly different in the Crinone and Utrogestan groups at days 12 (Crinone 35.3%, Utrogestan 29.9%, P = 0.55), 30 (Crinone 28.5%, Utrogestan 25.0%, P = 0.61) and 90 (Crinone 25.9%, Utrogestan 22.9%, P = 0.69). No differences in the spontaneous abortion rates were seen thereafter. The delivery rates (number of deliveries per patient; Crinone 23.0%, Utrogestan 22.2%, P = 1.00), as well as the ratio of newborn babies per embryo transferred (Crinone 11.7%, Utrogestan 11.1%, P = 0.91), were not significantly different. Safety parameters were similar in both groups, except for drowsiness, which was more significantly frequent in the oral progesterone group than in the Crinone group at all time points. No serious adverse events were recorded in this study. The fact that Crinone matches the efficacy of the larger doses of progesterone used orally reflects an advantage of the transvaginal route of administration which avoids the metabolic inactivation of progesterone during its first liver pass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8943507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Delayed-Action Preparations ; Embryo Implantation ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gels ; Humans ; Luteal Phase ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Progesterone - administration &amp; dosage ; Progesterone - adverse effects ; Progesterone - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 1996-10, Vol.11 (10), p.2085</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8943507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pouly, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassil, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frydman, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedon, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicollet, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prada, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoine, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zambrano, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnez, J</creatorcontrib><title>Luteal support after in-vitro fertilization: Crinone 8%, a sustained release vaginal progesterone gel, versus Utrogestan, an oral micronized progesterone</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>Two progesterone presentations, a vaginal application of 90 mg progesterone per day (Crinone) or 300 mg progesterone administered orally (Utrogestan), were compared for luteal phase support of patients undergoing an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure. A total of 283 patients were randomly allocated to either treatment. The treatment started within 24 h after the embryo transfer procedure and continued until day 30 in cases of implantation. Efficacy was assessed using the pregnancy and delivery rates. Safety was assessed through specific symptoms and usual safety monitoring. The pregnancy rates per transfer were not significantly different in the Crinone and Utrogestan groups at days 12 (Crinone 35.3%, Utrogestan 29.9%, P = 0.55), 30 (Crinone 28.5%, Utrogestan 25.0%, P = 0.61) and 90 (Crinone 25.9%, Utrogestan 22.9%, P = 0.69). No differences in the spontaneous abortion rates were seen thereafter. The delivery rates (number of deliveries per patient; Crinone 23.0%, Utrogestan 22.2%, P = 1.00), as well as the ratio of newborn babies per embryo transferred (Crinone 11.7%, Utrogestan 11.1%, P = 0.91), were not significantly different. Safety parameters were similar in both groups, except for drowsiness, which was more significantly frequent in the oral progesterone group than in the Crinone group at all time points. No serious adverse events were recorded in this study. The fact that Crinone matches the efficacy of the larger doses of progesterone used orally reflects an advantage of the transvaginal route of administration which avoids the metabolic inactivation of progesterone during its first liver pass.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Delayed-Action Preparations</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gels</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luteal Phase</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Progesterone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Progesterone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Progesterone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkLFOwzAURT2ASil8ApIXtkZyYsex2VAFFKkSC52r1_g5MkqcyHYr0T_hbzFqB6Z3pXvuGd4VmbNKqqIsZXlDbmP8YixHJWdkprTgNWvm5GdzSAg9jYdpGkOiYBMG6nxxdCmM1GJIrncnSG70T3QVnB89UvW4pJA3MYHzaGjAHiEiPULnfLZNYewwZtMf3GG_pEcMGafbdG7AZ4GnY8jw4NrMuVP2_N_dkWsLfcT7y12Q7evL52pdbD7e3lfPm2KqmEyFFLytUe250FKDNi0AWAGm1MIKLhTTjO0b1rSyqitTi1aXRtnSNpxLzdDwBXk4e6fDfkCzm4IbIHzvLi_iv1dqZS8</recordid><startdate>19961001</startdate><enddate>19961001</enddate><creator>Pouly, J L</creator><creator>Bassil, S</creator><creator>Frydman, R</creator><creator>Hedon, B</creator><creator>Nicollet, B</creator><creator>Prada, Y</creator><creator>Antoine, J M</creator><creator>Zambrano, R</creator><creator>Donnez, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961001</creationdate><title>Luteal support after in-vitro fertilization: Crinone 8%, a sustained release vaginal progesterone gel, versus Utrogestan, an oral micronized progesterone</title><author>Pouly, J L ; Bassil, S ; Frydman, R ; Hedon, B ; Nicollet, B ; Prada, Y ; Antoine, J M ; Zambrano, R ; Donnez, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p206t-643c5e8b34969a9dcaaaf4ad194f43480900b707c6252d54c91d8f1f733690ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Delayed-Action Preparations</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gels</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luteal Phase</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Progesterone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Progesterone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Progesterone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pouly, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassil, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frydman, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedon, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicollet, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prada, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoine, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zambrano, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnez, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pouly, J L</au><au>Bassil, S</au><au>Frydman, R</au><au>Hedon, B</au><au>Nicollet, B</au><au>Prada, Y</au><au>Antoine, J M</au><au>Zambrano, R</au><au>Donnez, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Luteal support after in-vitro fertilization: Crinone 8%, a sustained release vaginal progesterone gel, versus Utrogestan, an oral micronized progesterone</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>1996-10-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2085</spage><pages>2085-</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><abstract>Two progesterone presentations, a vaginal application of 90 mg progesterone per day (Crinone) or 300 mg progesterone administered orally (Utrogestan), were compared for luteal phase support of patients undergoing an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure. A total of 283 patients were randomly allocated to either treatment. The treatment started within 24 h after the embryo transfer procedure and continued until day 30 in cases of implantation. Efficacy was assessed using the pregnancy and delivery rates. Safety was assessed through specific symptoms and usual safety monitoring. The pregnancy rates per transfer were not significantly different in the Crinone and Utrogestan groups at days 12 (Crinone 35.3%, Utrogestan 29.9%, P = 0.55), 30 (Crinone 28.5%, Utrogestan 25.0%, P = 0.61) and 90 (Crinone 25.9%, Utrogestan 22.9%, P = 0.69). No differences in the spontaneous abortion rates were seen thereafter. The delivery rates (number of deliveries per patient; Crinone 23.0%, Utrogestan 22.2%, P = 1.00), as well as the ratio of newborn babies per embryo transferred (Crinone 11.7%, Utrogestan 11.1%, P = 0.91), were not significantly different. Safety parameters were similar in both groups, except for drowsiness, which was more significantly frequent in the oral progesterone group than in the Crinone group at all time points. No serious adverse events were recorded in this study. The fact that Crinone matches the efficacy of the larger doses of progesterone used orally reflects an advantage of the transvaginal route of administration which avoids the metabolic inactivation of progesterone during its first liver pass.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>8943507</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 1996-10, Vol.11 (10), p.2085
issn 0268-1161
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_8943507
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Administration, Oral
Adult
Delayed-Action Preparations
Embryo Implantation
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Gels
Humans
Luteal Phase
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Progesterone - administration & dosage
Progesterone - adverse effects
Progesterone - therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
title Luteal support after in-vitro fertilization: Crinone 8%, a sustained release vaginal progesterone gel, versus Utrogestan, an oral micronized progesterone
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Luteal%20support%20after%20in-vitro%20fertilization:%20Crinone%208%25,%20a%20sustained%20release%20vaginal%20progesterone%20gel,%20versus%20Utrogestan,%20an%20oral%20micronized%20progesterone&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Pouly,%20J%20L&rft.date=1996-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2085&rft.pages=2085-&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E8943507%3C/pubmed%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p206t-643c5e8b34969a9dcaaaf4ad194f43480900b707c6252d54c91d8f1f733690ed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8943507&rfr_iscdi=true