Loading…
Enhancement of Amphetamine- and Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Activity after Chronic Ethanol Administration
The effects of amphetamine and cocaine on locomotor activity in mice were studied after 3 weeks of chronic administration of ethanol by liquid diet. When testing was started 24 h after cessation of the ethanol treatment, no differences were seen on the first administration between the effects of the...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 1997-06, Vol.281 (3), p.1330-1339 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7d1893ac81e74d6dedb593a42207fc7d29222899328bbbcc86b96e1a4d6cf7c83 |
container_end_page | 1339 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1330 |
container_title | The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics |
container_volume | 281 |
creator | Manley, S.J. Little, H.J. |
description | The effects of amphetamine and cocaine on locomotor activity in mice were studied after 3 weeks of chronic administration of ethanol by liquid diet. When testing was started 24 h after cessation of the ethanol treatment, no differences were seen on the first administration between the effects of the psychostimulants in controls and ethanol-treated animals, but after subsequent daily injections of amphetamine and cocaine, at doses that were insufficient to cause sensitization in controls, sensitization to both of these drugs was seen in ethanol-treated mice. When testing was started on the sixth day after cessation of the ethanol treatment, the effects of amphetamine on the first administration were significantly greater in ethanol-treated animals than in controls. After subsequent repeated daily injections, the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine were greater in ethanol-treated mice than in controls. Administration of amphetamine for the first time 2 months after cessation of ethanol treatment also had a greater stimulant effect, compared with that in control animals. Two months after cessation of ethanol treatment, the first dose of cocaine caused a locomotor stimulation that was not seen in control animals, but sensitization was not seen after repeated cocaine administration in either group of animals. No differences in the effects of amphetamine or cocaine were seen after only 7 days of ethanol treatment. The results indicate that changes are still present in the CNS long after ethanol withdrawal hyperexcitability has subsided and that these changes result in increases in the effects of amphetamine and cocaine. Analysis of brain concentrations of the two psychostimulants suggested that metabolic changes were not responsible for the differing effects in control and ethanol-treated animals. It is possible that alterations in mesolimbic dopamine transmission are responsible for the effects of the ethanol treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)36708-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_9190869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022356524367084</els_id><sourcerecordid>9190869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7d1893ac81e74d6dedb593a42207fc7d29222899328bbbcc86b96e1a4d6cf7c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWqsfQchNPazm3-5mT1JK1ULBg3oO2Um2G-luSjZW-u1NbenV0_CY9x4zP4RuKHmghBaP74QwlvG8yO-YuOdFSWQmTtCI5oxmhBJ-ikZHywW6HIYvQqgQBT9H5xWtiCyqEVrO-lb3YDvbR-wbPOnWrY26c73NsO4NnnrQOzHvzTdYgxcefOejD3gC0W1c3GLdRBvwtA2-d4BnMRX6FZ6YVOKGGHR0vr9CZ41eDfb6MMfo83n2MX3NFm8v8-lkkQEXJGalobLiGiS1pTCFsabOkxaMkbKB0rCKMSarijNZ1zWALOqqsFQnLzQlSD5G-b4Xgh-GYBu1Dq7TYasoUTtu6o-b2kFRTKg_bkqk3M0-t_6uO2uOqQOotL_d71u3bH9csGrd6tBp8Cu_3ComqeKKck6S82nvtOnNjbNBDeBsQmxSCqIy3v1zyy_s_4u7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancement of Amphetamine- and Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Activity after Chronic Ethanol Administration</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Manley, S.J. ; Little, H.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Manley, S.J. ; Little, H.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of amphetamine and cocaine on locomotor activity in mice were studied after 3 weeks of chronic administration of ethanol by liquid diet. When testing was started 24 h after cessation of the ethanol treatment, no differences were seen on the first administration between the effects of the psychostimulants in controls and ethanol-treated animals, but after subsequent daily injections of amphetamine and cocaine, at doses that were insufficient to cause sensitization in controls, sensitization to both of these drugs was seen in ethanol-treated mice. When testing was started on the sixth day after cessation of the ethanol treatment, the effects of amphetamine on the first administration were significantly greater in ethanol-treated animals than in controls. After subsequent repeated daily injections, the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine were greater in ethanol-treated mice than in controls. Administration of amphetamine for the first time 2 months after cessation of ethanol treatment also had a greater stimulant effect, compared with that in control animals. Two months after cessation of ethanol treatment, the first dose of cocaine caused a locomotor stimulation that was not seen in control animals, but sensitization was not seen after repeated cocaine administration in either group of animals. No differences in the effects of amphetamine or cocaine were seen after only 7 days of ethanol treatment. The results indicate that changes are still present in the CNS long after ethanol withdrawal hyperexcitability has subsided and that these changes result in increases in the effects of amphetamine and cocaine. Analysis of brain concentrations of the two psychostimulants suggested that metabolic changes were not responsible for the differing effects in control and ethanol-treated animals. It is possible that alterations in mesolimbic dopamine transmission are responsible for the effects of the ethanol treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)36708-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9190869</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Amphetamine - pharmacology ; Animals ; Cocaine - pharmacology ; Drug Synergism ; Ethanol - pharmacology ; Locomotion - drug effects ; Male ; Mice ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 1997-06, Vol.281 (3), p.1330-1339</ispartof><rights>1997 American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7d1893ac81e74d6dedb593a42207fc7d29222899328bbbcc86b96e1a4d6cf7c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9190869$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manley, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, H.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancement of Amphetamine- and Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Activity after Chronic Ethanol Administration</title><title>The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Pharmacol Exp Ther</addtitle><description>The effects of amphetamine and cocaine on locomotor activity in mice were studied after 3 weeks of chronic administration of ethanol by liquid diet. When testing was started 24 h after cessation of the ethanol treatment, no differences were seen on the first administration between the effects of the psychostimulants in controls and ethanol-treated animals, but after subsequent daily injections of amphetamine and cocaine, at doses that were insufficient to cause sensitization in controls, sensitization to both of these drugs was seen in ethanol-treated mice. When testing was started on the sixth day after cessation of the ethanol treatment, the effects of amphetamine on the first administration were significantly greater in ethanol-treated animals than in controls. After subsequent repeated daily injections, the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine were greater in ethanol-treated mice than in controls. Administration of amphetamine for the first time 2 months after cessation of ethanol treatment also had a greater stimulant effect, compared with that in control animals. Two months after cessation of ethanol treatment, the first dose of cocaine caused a locomotor stimulation that was not seen in control animals, but sensitization was not seen after repeated cocaine administration in either group of animals. No differences in the effects of amphetamine or cocaine were seen after only 7 days of ethanol treatment. The results indicate that changes are still present in the CNS long after ethanol withdrawal hyperexcitability has subsided and that these changes result in increases in the effects of amphetamine and cocaine. Analysis of brain concentrations of the two psychostimulants suggested that metabolic changes were not responsible for the differing effects in control and ethanol-treated animals. It is possible that alterations in mesolimbic dopamine transmission are responsible for the effects of the ethanol treatment.</description><subject>Amphetamine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cocaine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Drug Synergism</subject><subject>Ethanol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Locomotion - drug effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0022-3565</issn><issn>1521-0103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEQxYMoWqsfQchNPazm3-5mT1JK1ULBg3oO2Um2G-luSjZW-u1NbenV0_CY9x4zP4RuKHmghBaP74QwlvG8yO-YuOdFSWQmTtCI5oxmhBJ-ikZHywW6HIYvQqgQBT9H5xWtiCyqEVrO-lb3YDvbR-wbPOnWrY26c73NsO4NnnrQOzHvzTdYgxcefOejD3gC0W1c3GLdRBvwtA2-d4BnMRX6FZ6YVOKGGHR0vr9CZ41eDfb6MMfo83n2MX3NFm8v8-lkkQEXJGalobLiGiS1pTCFsabOkxaMkbKB0rCKMSarijNZ1zWALOqqsFQnLzQlSD5G-b4Xgh-GYBu1Dq7TYasoUTtu6o-b2kFRTKg_bkqk3M0-t_6uO2uOqQOotL_d71u3bH9csGrd6tBp8Cu_3ComqeKKck6S82nvtOnNjbNBDeBsQmxSCqIy3v1zyy_s_4u7</recordid><startdate>19970601</startdate><enddate>19970601</enddate><creator>Manley, S.J.</creator><creator>Little, H.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970601</creationdate><title>Enhancement of Amphetamine- and Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Activity after Chronic Ethanol Administration</title><author>Manley, S.J. ; Little, H.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7d1893ac81e74d6dedb593a42207fc7d29222899328bbbcc86b96e1a4d6cf7c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Amphetamine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cocaine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Drug Synergism</topic><topic>Ethanol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Locomotion - drug effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manley, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, H.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manley, S.J.</au><au>Little, H.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancement of Amphetamine- and Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Activity after Chronic Ethanol Administration</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharmacol Exp Ther</addtitle><date>1997-06-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>281</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1330</spage><epage>1339</epage><pages>1330-1339</pages><issn>0022-3565</issn><eissn>1521-0103</eissn><abstract>The effects of amphetamine and cocaine on locomotor activity in mice were studied after 3 weeks of chronic administration of ethanol by liquid diet. When testing was started 24 h after cessation of the ethanol treatment, no differences were seen on the first administration between the effects of the psychostimulants in controls and ethanol-treated animals, but after subsequent daily injections of amphetamine and cocaine, at doses that were insufficient to cause sensitization in controls, sensitization to both of these drugs was seen in ethanol-treated mice. When testing was started on the sixth day after cessation of the ethanol treatment, the effects of amphetamine on the first administration were significantly greater in ethanol-treated animals than in controls. After subsequent repeated daily injections, the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine were greater in ethanol-treated mice than in controls. Administration of amphetamine for the first time 2 months after cessation of ethanol treatment also had a greater stimulant effect, compared with that in control animals. Two months after cessation of ethanol treatment, the first dose of cocaine caused a locomotor stimulation that was not seen in control animals, but sensitization was not seen after repeated cocaine administration in either group of animals. No differences in the effects of amphetamine or cocaine were seen after only 7 days of ethanol treatment. The results indicate that changes are still present in the CNS long after ethanol withdrawal hyperexcitability has subsided and that these changes result in increases in the effects of amphetamine and cocaine. Analysis of brain concentrations of the two psychostimulants suggested that metabolic changes were not responsible for the differing effects in control and ethanol-treated animals. It is possible that alterations in mesolimbic dopamine transmission are responsible for the effects of the ethanol treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9190869</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0022-3565(24)36708-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3565 |
ispartof | The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 1997-06, Vol.281 (3), p.1330-1339 |
issn | 0022-3565 1521-0103 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_9190869 |
source | Freely Accessible Journals |
subjects | Amphetamine - pharmacology Animals Cocaine - pharmacology Drug Synergism Ethanol - pharmacology Locomotion - drug effects Male Mice Time Factors |
title | Enhancement of Amphetamine- and Cocaine-Induced Locomotor Activity after Chronic Ethanol Administration |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A49%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancement%20of%20Amphetamine-%20and%20Cocaine-Induced%20Locomotor%20Activity%20after%20Chronic%20Ethanol%20Administration&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pharmacology%20and%20experimental%20therapeutics&rft.au=Manley,%20S.J.&rft.date=1997-06-01&rft.volume=281&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1330&rft.epage=1339&rft.pages=1330-1339&rft.issn=0022-3565&rft.eissn=1521-0103&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-3565(24)36708-4&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E9190869%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-7d1893ac81e74d6dedb593a42207fc7d29222899328bbbcc86b96e1a4d6cf7c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9190869&rfr_iscdi=true |