Docetaxel chronopharmacology in mice

• Published in: Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 1998-09, Vol.58 (17), p.3896-3904
• Main Authors: TAMPELLINI, M, FILIPSKI, E, XU HUI LIU, LEMAIGRE, G, XIAO MEI LI, VRIGNAUD, P, FRANCOIS, E, BISSERY, M. C, LEVI, F
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Antineoplastic agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - administration & dosage; Biological and medical sciences; Body Weight - drug effects; Bone Marrow - drug effects; Chemotherapy; Circadian Rhythm; Drug Administration Schedule; Male; Medical sciences; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neoplasms, Experimental - drug therapy; Neoplasms, Experimental - mortality; Paclitaxel - administration & dosage; Paclitaxel - analogs & derivatives; Paclitaxel - pharmacology; Paclitaxel - toxicity; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2 - analysis; Taxoids
• ISSN: 0008-5472; 1538-7445

Docetaxel tolerance and antitumor efficacy could be enhanced if drug administration was adapted to circadian rhythms. This hypothesis was investigated in seven experiments involving a total of 626 male B6D2F1 mice, synchronized with an alternation of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness (12:12), after i.v. administration of docetaxel. In experiment (Exp) 1, the drug was given once a week (wk) for 6 wks (20 mg/kg/wk) or for 5 wks (30 mg/kg/wk) at one of six circadian times, during light when mice were resting [3, 7, or 11 hours after light onset (HALO)], or during darkness, when mice were active (15, 19, or 23 HALO). Endpoints were survival and body weight change. In Exp 2 and 3, docetaxel (30 mg/kg/wk) was administered twice, 1 wk apart, at one of four circadian stages (7, 11, 19, or 23 HALO). Endpoints were hematological and intestinal toxicities. In Exp 4, circadian changes in cell cycle phase distribution and BCL-2 immunofluorescence were investigated in bone marrow as possible mechanisms of docetaxel tolerability rhythm. In Exp 5 to 7, docetaxel was administered to mice bearing measurable P03 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (270-370 mg), with tumor weight and survival as endpoints. Mice from Exp 5 and 6 received a weekly schedule of docetaxel at one of six circadian stages (20 or 30 mg/kg/wk at 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, or 23 HALO). In Exp 7, docetaxel (30 mg/kg) was given every 2 days (day 1, 3, 5 schedule) at 7, 11, 19, or 23 HALO. Docetaxel dosing in the second half of darkness (19 or 23 HALO) resulted in significantly worse toxicity than its administration during the light span (3, 7, or 11 HALO). The survival rate ranged from 56.3% in the mice treated at 23 HALO to 93.8 or 87.5% in those injected at 3 or 11 HALO, respectively (Exp 1, P < 0.01). Granulocytopenia at nadir was -49 +/- 14% at 7 HALO compared with -84 +/- 3% at 19 HALO (Exp 2 and 3, P < 0.029), and severe jejunal mucosa necrosis occurred in 5 of 8 mice treated at 23 HALO as opposed to 2 of 18 receiving docetaxel at 7, 11, or 19 HALO (Exp 2 and 3, P < 0.02). The time of least docetaxel toxicity corresponded to the circadian nadir in S or G2-M phase and to the circadian maximum in BCL-2 immunofluorescence in bone marrow. Docetaxel increased the median survival of tumor-bearing mice in a dose-dependent manner (controls: 24 days; 20 mg/kg weekly, 33 days; 30 mg/kg weekly or day 1, 3, 5 schedule, 44 or 46 days, respectively; Exp 5-7). Survival curves of treated mice differed significantly according to dosi