Loading…

Calibration and assessment of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system for the measurement of ventricular diastolic pressures

A concise set of experiments is described which detail the calibration of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system and the assessment of a widely used industrial algorithm for determining end-diastolic pressures using that system. First, the static response of the catheter-transducer system was eva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiological measurement 1998-08, Vol.19 (3), p.405-412
Main Authors: Brennan, Edmund G, O'Hare, Neil J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-eacf600af3a0d2c00678e0cf3b75e9290d4fe0f2ce31f5d22746b7b3b398892a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-eacf600af3a0d2c00678e0cf3b75e9290d4fe0f2ce31f5d22746b7b3b398892a3
container_end_page 412
container_issue 3
container_start_page 405
container_title Physiological measurement
container_volume 19
creator Brennan, Edmund G
O'Hare, Neil J
description A concise set of experiments is described which detail the calibration of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system and the assessment of a widely used industrial algorithm for determining end-diastolic pressures using that system. First, the static response of the catheter-transducer system was evaluated in vitro by inserting the catheter into a graduated cylinder of saline. Twelve observations revealed a systematic undervaluation of pressure by the system of 1.78 mmHg with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -6.22 to 2.66 mmHg. Next, the dynamic response was evaluated in vivo by performing a transient step-response test. The system had an adequate dynamic response (fn = 11.12 Hz) for intraventricular pressure waveform replication but was considerably underdamped (beta = 0.16). Finally, the ability of the analysis software to detect the point of end-diastole and evaluate end-diastolic pressure was assessed by comparing system output with manual measurements of end-diastolic pressure in 12 patients. The mean difference between manually determined end-diastolic pressure and system output was 0.83 +/- 1.68 mm Hg. This difference is clinically insignificant and shows that the more noteworthy source of error is in the manometer-transducer emphasizing the importance of calibration and quality assurance of fluid-filled catheter-transducer systems for use in clinical cardiology or research.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0967-3334/19/3/009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_9735891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73894680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-eacf600af3a0d2c00678e0cf3b75e9290d4fe0f2ce31f5d22746b7b3b398892a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEuLFDEUhYMoYzv6BwQhK8FF2TeVrqpkKc34gAE3ug6p5AYjqYe5KWE2_nbTdNubAVd3cb5zLnyMvRbwXoBSe9D90EgpD3uh93IPoJ-wnZC9aPpu0E_Z7go8Zy-IfgIIodruht3oQXZKix37c7QpjtmWuMzczp5bIiSacC58CdzykLbomxBTQs-dLT-wYG5KtjP5zWHm9EAFJx6WzGvIJ7S0Zfw38LveHN2WbOY-WipLio6vuf6oFL1kz4JNhK8u95Z9_3j37fi5uf_66cvxw33j5AClQetCD2CDtOBbB9APCsEFOQ4d6laDPwSE0DqUInS-bYdDPw6jHKVWSrdW3rK35901L782pGKmSA5TsjMuG5lBKn3oFVSwPYMuL0QZg1lznGx-MALMSbo5OTUnp0ZoI02VXktvLuvbOKG_Vi6Wa_7unMdlvYaPd8zqQ2Wbx-x_fv8Fv-qazw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73894680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calibration and assessment of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system for the measurement of ventricular diastolic pressures</title><source>Institute of Physics</source><source>Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:IOP Publishing Journal Archive 1874-1998 (access period 2020 to 2024)</source><creator>Brennan, Edmund G ; O'Hare, Neil J</creator><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Edmund G ; O'Hare, Neil J</creatorcontrib><description>A concise set of experiments is described which detail the calibration of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system and the assessment of a widely used industrial algorithm for determining end-diastolic pressures using that system. First, the static response of the catheter-transducer system was evaluated in vitro by inserting the catheter into a graduated cylinder of saline. Twelve observations revealed a systematic undervaluation of pressure by the system of 1.78 mmHg with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -6.22 to 2.66 mmHg. Next, the dynamic response was evaluated in vivo by performing a transient step-response test. The system had an adequate dynamic response (fn = 11.12 Hz) for intraventricular pressure waveform replication but was considerably underdamped (beta = 0.16). Finally, the ability of the analysis software to detect the point of end-diastole and evaluate end-diastolic pressure was assessed by comparing system output with manual measurements of end-diastolic pressure in 12 patients. The mean difference between manually determined end-diastolic pressure and system output was 0.83 +/- 1.68 mm Hg. This difference is clinically insignificant and shows that the more noteworthy source of error is in the manometer-transducer emphasizing the importance of calibration and quality assurance of fluid-filled catheter-transducer systems for use in clinical cardiology or research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-3334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/19/3/009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9735891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Animals ; Blood Pressure Determination - methods ; Catheterization - instrumentation ; Catheterization - methods ; Diastole ; Humans ; Ventricular Pressure</subject><ispartof>Physiological measurement, 1998-08, Vol.19 (3), p.405-412</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-eacf600af3a0d2c00678e0cf3b75e9290d4fe0f2ce31f5d22746b7b3b398892a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-eacf600af3a0d2c00678e0cf3b75e9290d4fe0f2ce31f5d22746b7b3b398892a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0967-3334/19/3/009/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53950</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9735891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Edmund G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Hare, Neil J</creatorcontrib><title>Calibration and assessment of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system for the measurement of ventricular diastolic pressures</title><title>Physiological measurement</title><addtitle>Physiol Meas</addtitle><description>A concise set of experiments is described which detail the calibration of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system and the assessment of a widely used industrial algorithm for determining end-diastolic pressures using that system. First, the static response of the catheter-transducer system was evaluated in vitro by inserting the catheter into a graduated cylinder of saline. Twelve observations revealed a systematic undervaluation of pressure by the system of 1.78 mmHg with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -6.22 to 2.66 mmHg. Next, the dynamic response was evaluated in vivo by performing a transient step-response test. The system had an adequate dynamic response (fn = 11.12 Hz) for intraventricular pressure waveform replication but was considerably underdamped (beta = 0.16). Finally, the ability of the analysis software to detect the point of end-diastole and evaluate end-diastolic pressure was assessed by comparing system output with manual measurements of end-diastolic pressure in 12 patients. The mean difference between manually determined end-diastolic pressure and system output was 0.83 +/- 1.68 mm Hg. This difference is clinically insignificant and shows that the more noteworthy source of error is in the manometer-transducer emphasizing the importance of calibration and quality assurance of fluid-filled catheter-transducer systems for use in clinical cardiology or research.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</subject><subject>Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Diastole</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ventricular Pressure</subject><issn>0967-3334</issn><issn>1361-6579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEuLFDEUhYMoYzv6BwQhK8FF2TeVrqpkKc34gAE3ug6p5AYjqYe5KWE2_nbTdNubAVd3cb5zLnyMvRbwXoBSe9D90EgpD3uh93IPoJ-wnZC9aPpu0E_Z7go8Zy-IfgIIodruht3oQXZKix37c7QpjtmWuMzczp5bIiSacC58CdzykLbomxBTQs-dLT-wYG5KtjP5zWHm9EAFJx6WzGvIJ7S0Zfw38LveHN2WbOY-WipLio6vuf6oFL1kz4JNhK8u95Z9_3j37fi5uf_66cvxw33j5AClQetCD2CDtOBbB9APCsEFOQ4d6laDPwSE0DqUInS-bYdDPw6jHKVWSrdW3rK35901L782pGKmSA5TsjMuG5lBKn3oFVSwPYMuL0QZg1lznGx-MALMSbo5OTUnp0ZoI02VXktvLuvbOKG_Vi6Wa_7unMdlvYaPd8zqQ2Wbx-x_fv8Fv-qazw</recordid><startdate>19980801</startdate><enddate>19980801</enddate><creator>Brennan, Edmund G</creator><creator>O'Hare, Neil J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980801</creationdate><title>Calibration and assessment of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system for the measurement of ventricular diastolic pressures</title><author>Brennan, Edmund G ; O'Hare, Neil J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-eacf600af3a0d2c00678e0cf3b75e9290d4fe0f2ce31f5d22746b7b3b398892a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination - methods</topic><topic>Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Diastole</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ventricular Pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Edmund G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Hare, Neil J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brennan, Edmund G</au><au>O'Hare, Neil J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calibration and assessment of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system for the measurement of ventricular diastolic pressures</atitle><jtitle>Physiological measurement</jtitle><addtitle>Physiol Meas</addtitle><date>1998-08-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>405-412</pages><issn>0967-3334</issn><eissn>1361-6579</eissn><abstract>A concise set of experiments is described which detail the calibration of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system and the assessment of a widely used industrial algorithm for determining end-diastolic pressures using that system. First, the static response of the catheter-transducer system was evaluated in vitro by inserting the catheter into a graduated cylinder of saline. Twelve observations revealed a systematic undervaluation of pressure by the system of 1.78 mmHg with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -6.22 to 2.66 mmHg. Next, the dynamic response was evaluated in vivo by performing a transient step-response test. The system had an adequate dynamic response (fn = 11.12 Hz) for intraventricular pressure waveform replication but was considerably underdamped (beta = 0.16). Finally, the ability of the analysis software to detect the point of end-diastole and evaluate end-diastolic pressure was assessed by comparing system output with manual measurements of end-diastolic pressure in 12 patients. The mean difference between manually determined end-diastolic pressure and system output was 0.83 +/- 1.68 mm Hg. This difference is clinically insignificant and shows that the more noteworthy source of error is in the manometer-transducer emphasizing the importance of calibration and quality assurance of fluid-filled catheter-transducer systems for use in clinical cardiology or research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>9735891</pmid><doi>10.1088/0967-3334/19/3/009</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-3334
ispartof Physiological measurement, 1998-08, Vol.19 (3), p.405-412
issn 0967-3334
1361-6579
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_9735891
source Institute of Physics; Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:IOP Publishing Journal Archive 1874-1998 (access period 2020 to 2024)
subjects Animals
Blood Pressure Determination - methods
Catheterization - instrumentation
Catheterization - methods
Diastole
Humans
Ventricular Pressure
title Calibration and assessment of a fluid-filled catheter-transducer system for the measurement of ventricular diastolic pressures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A37%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calibration%20and%20assessment%20of%20a%20fluid-filled%20catheter-transducer%20system%20for%20the%20measurement%20of%20ventricular%20diastolic%20pressures&rft.jtitle=Physiological%20measurement&rft.au=Brennan,%20Edmund%20G&rft.date=1998-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=405-412&rft.issn=0967-3334&rft.eissn=1361-6579&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0967-3334/19/3/009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E73894680%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-eacf600af3a0d2c00678e0cf3b75e9290d4fe0f2ce31f5d22746b7b3b398892a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73894680&rft_id=info:pmid/9735891&rfr_iscdi=true