Studies on the Corticospinal Control of Human Walking. I. Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex

• Published in: Journal of neurophysiology 1999-01, Vol.81 (1), p.129-139
• Main Authors: Capaday, Charles, Lavoie, Brigitte A, Barbeau, Hugues, Schneider, Cyril, Bonnard, Mireille
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Algorithms; Electromagnetic Fields; Electromyography; Humans; Middle Aged; Motor Cortex - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Spinal Cord - physiology; Walking - physiology
• ISSN: 0022-3077; 1522-1598
• DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.81.1.129

Charles Capaday , Brigitte A. Lavoie , Hugues Barbeau , Cyril Schneider , and Mireille Bonnard Centre de Recherche Université Laval-Robert Giffard, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec H3G 1Y5, Canada Capaday, Charles, Brigitte A. Lavoie, Hugues Barbeau, Cyril Schneider, and Mireille Bonnard. Studies on the corticospinal control of human walking. I. Responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 129-139, 1999. Experiments were done to determine the extent to which the corticospinal tract is linked with the segmental motor circuits controlling ankle flexors and extensors during human walking compared with voluntary motor tasks requiring attention to the level of motor activity. The motor cortex was activated transcranially using a focal magnetic stimulation coil. For each subject, the entire input-output (I-O) curve [i.e., the integral of the motor evoked-potential (MEP) versus stimulus strength] was measured during a prescribed tonic voluntary contraction of either the tibialis anterior (TA) or the soleus. Similarly, I-O curves were measured in the early part of the swing phase, or in the early part of the stance phase of walking. The I-O data points were fitted by the Boltzmann sigmoidal function, which accounted for 80% of total data variance. There was no statistically significant difference between the I-O curves of the TA measured during voluntary ankle dorsiflexion or during the swing phase of walking, at matched levels of background electromyographic (EMG) activity. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the relation between the coefficient of variation and the amplitude of the MEPs measured in each task, respectively. In comparison, during the stance phase of walking the soleus MEPs were reduced on average by 26% compared with their size during voluntary ankle plantarflexion. Furthermore, during stance the MEPs in the inactive TA were enhanced relative to their size during voluntary ankle plantarflexion and in four of six subjects the TA MEPs were larger than those of the soleus. Finally, stimulation of the motor cortex at various phases of the step cycle did not reset the cycle. The time of the next step occurred at the expected moment, as determined from the phase-resetting curve. One interpretation of this result is that the motor cortex may not be part of the central neural system involved in timing the motor bursts during the step cycle. We sug