Loading…
Comparative Analysis of Elastic Polyester Sportswear Fabrics with Printed Graphene Patterns
In this study two elastic polyester fabrics differentiated by a graphene-printed pattern, called honeycomb (HC) and spider web (SW), were analyzed with a focus on their thermal, mechanical, moisture management and sensorial properties, aiming to identify the fabric with the most elevated heat dissip...
Saved in:
Published in: | Materials 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2028 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-6d5bcbf9402f569e3b24194acc7cff5ec8dace5116c7e47c55ece1d9eb51517d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-6d5bcbf9402f569e3b24194acc7cff5ec8dace5116c7e47c55ece1d9eb51517d3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2028 |
container_title | Materials |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Vasile, Simona Georgievska, Magdalena Copot, Cosmin De Raeve, Alexandra |
description | In this study two elastic polyester fabrics differentiated by a graphene-printed pattern, called honeycomb (HC) and spider web (SW), were analyzed with a focus on their thermal, mechanical, moisture management and sensorial properties, aiming to identify the fabric with the most elevated heat dissipation and comfort for sportswear. The shape of the graphene-printed circuit did not lead to significant difference between the mechanical properties of the fabrics SW and HC assessed by the Fabric Touch Tester (FTT). Fabric SW outperformed fabric HC with respect of drying time, air permeability, moisture, and liquid management properties. On the other hand, both the Infrared (IR) thermography and FTT-predicted warmness clearly showed that fabric HC dissipates heat faster on its surface along the graphene circuit. This fabric was also predicted by the FTT as smoother and softer than fabric SW and had a better overall fabric hand. The results revealed that both graphene patterns resulted in comfortable fabrics with great potential applications in sportswear fields, in specific use scenario's. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ma16052028 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10004580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A741845642</galeid><sourcerecordid>A741845642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-6d5bcbf9402f569e3b24194acc7cff5ec8dace5116c7e47c55ece1d9eb51517d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rHCEUhqU0NCHNTX9AEXpTApvq-DHjVVmWJC0EupD0qhfiOMesYUan6ibsv6_tpmkavVCOz3k957wIvaPkjDFFPk2GSiIa0nSv0BFVSi6o4vz1s_shOsn5jtTFGO0a9QYdMqkIo5wdoR-rOM0mmeLvAS-DGXfZZxwdPh9NLt7idRx3kAskfD3HVPIDmIQvTJ-8zfjBlw1eJx8KDPgymXkDAfDalMqH_BYdODNmOHk8j9H3i_Ob1ZfF1bfLr6vl1cJyLstCDqK3vVOcNE5IBaxveK3bWNta5wTYbjAWBKXStsBbK2oI6KCgF1TQdmDH6PNed972EwwWQklm1HPyk0k7HY3X_78Ev9G38V7TOhMuOlIVPj4qpPhzW9vVk88WxtEEiNusm7aTRAnZ0op-eIHexW2qg_tDiYaqlnSVOttTt2YE7YOL9WNb9wCTtzGA8zW-bDntuJC8qQmn-wSbYs4J3FP5lOjfRut_Rlf4_fOGn9C_trJfu0qkiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785219708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Elastic Polyester Sportswear Fabrics with Printed Graphene Patterns</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Vasile, Simona ; Georgievska, Magdalena ; Copot, Cosmin ; De Raeve, Alexandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Vasile, Simona ; Georgievska, Magdalena ; Copot, Cosmin ; De Raeve, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><description>In this study two elastic polyester fabrics differentiated by a graphene-printed pattern, called honeycomb (HC) and spider web (SW), were analyzed with a focus on their thermal, mechanical, moisture management and sensorial properties, aiming to identify the fabric with the most elevated heat dissipation and comfort for sportswear. The shape of the graphene-printed circuit did not lead to significant difference between the mechanical properties of the fabrics SW and HC assessed by the Fabric Touch Tester (FTT). Fabric SW outperformed fabric HC with respect of drying time, air permeability, moisture, and liquid management properties. On the other hand, both the Infrared (IR) thermography and FTT-predicted warmness clearly showed that fabric HC dissipates heat faster on its surface along the graphene circuit. This fabric was also predicted by the FTT as smoother and softer than fabric SW and had a better overall fabric hand. The results revealed that both graphene patterns resulted in comfortable fabrics with great potential applications in sportswear fields, in specific use scenario's.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma16052028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36903143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Chemical vapor deposition ; Circuit printing ; Conductivity ; Cooling ; Cotton fabrics ; Dissipation ; Elastic analysis ; Electrodes ; Fabrics ; Graphene ; Graphite ; Heat conductivity ; Mechanical properties ; Moisture effects ; Permeability ; Physical properties ; Polyesters ; Printed circuits ; Protective clothing ; Radiation ; Screen printing ; Sensors ; Software ; Sport clothes ; Textiles ; Thermography</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2028</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-6d5bcbf9402f569e3b24194acc7cff5ec8dace5116c7e47c55ece1d9eb51517d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-6d5bcbf9402f569e3b24194acc7cff5ec8dace5116c7e47c55ece1d9eb51517d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7754-9013 ; 0000-0003-0937-5338</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2785219708/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2785219708?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vasile, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgievska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copot, Cosmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Raeve, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Elastic Polyester Sportswear Fabrics with Printed Graphene Patterns</title><title>Materials</title><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><description>In this study two elastic polyester fabrics differentiated by a graphene-printed pattern, called honeycomb (HC) and spider web (SW), were analyzed with a focus on their thermal, mechanical, moisture management and sensorial properties, aiming to identify the fabric with the most elevated heat dissipation and comfort for sportswear. The shape of the graphene-printed circuit did not lead to significant difference between the mechanical properties of the fabrics SW and HC assessed by the Fabric Touch Tester (FTT). Fabric SW outperformed fabric HC with respect of drying time, air permeability, moisture, and liquid management properties. On the other hand, both the Infrared (IR) thermography and FTT-predicted warmness clearly showed that fabric HC dissipates heat faster on its surface along the graphene circuit. This fabric was also predicted by the FTT as smoother and softer than fabric SW and had a better overall fabric hand. The results revealed that both graphene patterns resulted in comfortable fabrics with great potential applications in sportswear fields, in specific use scenario's.</description><subject>Chemical vapor deposition</subject><subject>Circuit printing</subject><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cotton fabrics</subject><subject>Dissipation</subject><subject>Elastic analysis</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Fabrics</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Graphite</subject><subject>Heat conductivity</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Printed circuits</subject><subject>Protective clothing</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Screen printing</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Sport clothes</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Thermography</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rHCEUhqU0NCHNTX9AEXpTApvq-DHjVVmWJC0EupD0qhfiOMesYUan6ibsv6_tpmkavVCOz3k957wIvaPkjDFFPk2GSiIa0nSv0BFVSi6o4vz1s_shOsn5jtTFGO0a9QYdMqkIo5wdoR-rOM0mmeLvAS-DGXfZZxwdPh9NLt7idRx3kAskfD3HVPIDmIQvTJ-8zfjBlw1eJx8KDPgymXkDAfDalMqH_BYdODNmOHk8j9H3i_Ob1ZfF1bfLr6vl1cJyLstCDqK3vVOcNE5IBaxveK3bWNta5wTYbjAWBKXStsBbK2oI6KCgF1TQdmDH6PNed972EwwWQklm1HPyk0k7HY3X_78Ev9G38V7TOhMuOlIVPj4qpPhzW9vVk88WxtEEiNusm7aTRAnZ0op-eIHexW2qg_tDiYaqlnSVOttTt2YE7YOL9WNb9wCTtzGA8zW-bDntuJC8qQmn-wSbYs4J3FP5lOjfRut_Rlf4_fOGn9C_trJfu0qkiQ</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Vasile, Simona</creator><creator>Georgievska, Magdalena</creator><creator>Copot, Cosmin</creator><creator>De Raeve, Alexandra</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7754-9013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-5338</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Elastic Polyester Sportswear Fabrics with Printed Graphene Patterns</title><author>Vasile, Simona ; Georgievska, Magdalena ; Copot, Cosmin ; De Raeve, Alexandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-6d5bcbf9402f569e3b24194acc7cff5ec8dace5116c7e47c55ece1d9eb51517d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Chemical vapor deposition</topic><topic>Circuit printing</topic><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cotton fabrics</topic><topic>Dissipation</topic><topic>Elastic analysis</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Fabrics</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Graphite</topic><topic>Heat conductivity</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Printed circuits</topic><topic>Protective clothing</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Screen printing</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Sport clothes</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Thermography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vasile, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georgievska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copot, Cosmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Raeve, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vasile, Simona</au><au>Georgievska, Magdalena</au><au>Copot, Cosmin</au><au>De Raeve, Alexandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Elastic Polyester Sportswear Fabrics with Printed Graphene Patterns</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2028</spage><pages>2028-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>In this study two elastic polyester fabrics differentiated by a graphene-printed pattern, called honeycomb (HC) and spider web (SW), were analyzed with a focus on their thermal, mechanical, moisture management and sensorial properties, aiming to identify the fabric with the most elevated heat dissipation and comfort for sportswear. The shape of the graphene-printed circuit did not lead to significant difference between the mechanical properties of the fabrics SW and HC assessed by the Fabric Touch Tester (FTT). Fabric SW outperformed fabric HC with respect of drying time, air permeability, moisture, and liquid management properties. On the other hand, both the Infrared (IR) thermography and FTT-predicted warmness clearly showed that fabric HC dissipates heat faster on its surface along the graphene circuit. This fabric was also predicted by the FTT as smoother and softer than fabric SW and had a better overall fabric hand. The results revealed that both graphene patterns resulted in comfortable fabrics with great potential applications in sportswear fields, in specific use scenario's.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36903143</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma16052028</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7754-9013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-5338</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1944 |
ispartof | Materials, 2023-03, Vol.16 (5), p.2028 |
issn | 1996-1944 1996-1944 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10004580 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Chemical vapor deposition Circuit printing Conductivity Cooling Cotton fabrics Dissipation Elastic analysis Electrodes Fabrics Graphene Graphite Heat conductivity Mechanical properties Moisture effects Permeability Physical properties Polyesters Printed circuits Protective clothing Radiation Screen printing Sensors Software Sport clothes Textiles Thermography |
title | Comparative Analysis of Elastic Polyester Sportswear Fabrics with Printed Graphene Patterns |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A23%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Elastic%20Polyester%20Sportswear%20Fabrics%20with%20Printed%20Graphene%20Patterns&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Vasile,%20Simona&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2028&rft.pages=2028-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma16052028&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA741845642%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-6d5bcbf9402f569e3b24194acc7cff5ec8dace5116c7e47c55ece1d9eb51517d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785219708&rft_id=info:pmid/36903143&rft_galeid=A741845642&rfr_iscdi=true |