Loading…

The Tradeoff Between Item and Order Information in Short-Term Memory Does Not Depend on Encoding Time

Participants can optimize encoding of an immediate verbal memory test for item or for order information, or they can try to be ready for either type of test. Dividing encoding between both kinds of information, however, comes at a cost. Recently, it has been shown that the cost is more severe for or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2023-01, Vol.49 (1), p.51-70
Main Authors: Guitard, Dominic, Cowan, Nelson
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-27f970417ab11e02d0b3e879d28fc0c792fc3db36419968a65bdab458e91fa3e3
cites
container_end_page 70
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
container_volume 49
creator Guitard, Dominic
Cowan, Nelson
description Participants can optimize encoding of an immediate verbal memory test for item or for order information, or they can try to be ready for either type of test. Dividing encoding between both kinds of information, however, comes at a cost. Recently, it has been shown that the cost is more severe for order information compared to item information (Guitard et al., 2022). Here, for the first time, we evaluated which factor can better account for this asymmetry by contrasting two hypotheses. According to a rate hypothesis, divided attention affects the rate of encoding more for order than for items. According to an alternative, asymptote hypothesis, divided attention does not affect the rates but diminishes the endpoint, or asymptotic level, of order encoding more than item encoding. In three experiments to distinguish these hypotheses, participants prepared for an item fragment completion test, an order reconstruction test, or both types of tests, in trials with different durations of presentation. Overall, our results were better accounted for by a model which assumes that dividing attention between preparation for item and order testing affects the asymptote of encoding more for order than for items, with no effects on the rates of order or item encoding compared to preparation for a single test. The findings not only replicate our prior results, but also demonstrate that the allocation of attention to item or order processing can be disentangled from the time on task. Public Significance Statement When remembering a list of items, information about the items (such as ingredients in your favorite recipe) and their order (such as which ingredients to add first, second, and so on) are important theoretically and practically. Here we show that the way attention is divided between words and their list order is stable regardless of whether each item is presented for a short time (fraction of a second) or a relatively long time (several seconds). In all cases, attention proves to be more critical for order information in short-term memory, a finding relevant to many cognitive activities (including communication, eating, and learning).
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xhp0001074
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10029126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2735171972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-27f970417ab11e02d0b3e879d28fc0c792fc3db36419968a65bdab458e91fa3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90cFu1DAUBVALgehQ2PAByBIbhBR4tpM4XiFoC4xU6IKwthz7pZMqsYOdAPP3eNTSAgtWXvj4yleXkKcMXjEQ8vXP3QwADGR5j2yYEqpgXMr7ZAOg6oJVXByRRyldwUE11UNyJGpRVRLqDcF2h7SNxmHoe_oOlx-Inm4XnKjxjl5Eh5FufR_iZJYheDp4-mUX4lK0GCf6CacQ9_Q0YKKfw0JPccb8LLszb4Mb_CVthwkfkwe9GRM-uTmPydf3Z-3Jx-L84sP25O15YUoJS8FlrySUTJqOMQTuoBPYSOV401uwUvHeCteJumRK1Y2pq86ZrqwaVKw3AsUxeXOdO6_dhM6iX6IZ9RyHycS9DmbQf9_4Yacvw3fNALhivM4JL24SYvi2Ylr0NCSL42g8hjVpLkXFJFOSZ_r8H3oV1uhzv6zqDBrFm_8rUUoBkkNWL6-VjSGliP3tnxnow8j6buSMn_3Z8pb-XvUuzcxGz2lvTVwGO2Kya4y5-SFMl0ozXTHxC627sDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734730720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Tradeoff Between Item and Order Information in Short-Term Memory Does Not Depend on Encoding Time</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Guitard, Dominic ; Cowan, Nelson</creator><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Guitard, Dominic ; Cowan, Nelson ; Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>Participants can optimize encoding of an immediate verbal memory test for item or for order information, or they can try to be ready for either type of test. Dividing encoding between both kinds of information, however, comes at a cost. Recently, it has been shown that the cost is more severe for order information compared to item information (Guitard et al., 2022). Here, for the first time, we evaluated which factor can better account for this asymmetry by contrasting two hypotheses. According to a rate hypothesis, divided attention affects the rate of encoding more for order than for items. According to an alternative, asymptote hypothesis, divided attention does not affect the rates but diminishes the endpoint, or asymptotic level, of order encoding more than item encoding. In three experiments to distinguish these hypotheses, participants prepared for an item fragment completion test, an order reconstruction test, or both types of tests, in trials with different durations of presentation. Overall, our results were better accounted for by a model which assumes that dividing attention between preparation for item and order testing affects the asymptote of encoding more for order than for items, with no effects on the rates of order or item encoding compared to preparation for a single test. The findings not only replicate our prior results, but also demonstrate that the allocation of attention to item or order processing can be disentangled from the time on task. Public Significance Statement When remembering a list of items, information about the items (such as ingredients in your favorite recipe) and their order (such as which ingredients to add first, second, and so on) are important theoretically and practically. Here we show that the way attention is divided between words and their list order is stable regardless of whether each item is presented for a short time (fraction of a second) or a relatively long time (several seconds). In all cases, attention proves to be more critical for order information in short-term memory, a finding relevant to many cognitive activities (including communication, eating, and learning).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001074</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36355706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Divided Attention ; Encoding ; Female ; Human ; Human Information Storage ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Information ; Male ; Memory, Short-Term ; Mental Recall ; Short Term Memory ; Verbal memory</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2023-01, Vol.49 (1), p.51-70</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-27f970417ab11e02d0b3e879d28fc0c792fc3db36419968a65bdab458e91fa3e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,30997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Guitard, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><title>The Tradeoff Between Item and Order Information in Short-Term Memory Does Not Depend on Encoding Time</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>Participants can optimize encoding of an immediate verbal memory test for item or for order information, or they can try to be ready for either type of test. Dividing encoding between both kinds of information, however, comes at a cost. Recently, it has been shown that the cost is more severe for order information compared to item information (Guitard et al., 2022). Here, for the first time, we evaluated which factor can better account for this asymmetry by contrasting two hypotheses. According to a rate hypothesis, divided attention affects the rate of encoding more for order than for items. According to an alternative, asymptote hypothesis, divided attention does not affect the rates but diminishes the endpoint, or asymptotic level, of order encoding more than item encoding. In three experiments to distinguish these hypotheses, participants prepared for an item fragment completion test, an order reconstruction test, or both types of tests, in trials with different durations of presentation. Overall, our results were better accounted for by a model which assumes that dividing attention between preparation for item and order testing affects the asymptote of encoding more for order than for items, with no effects on the rates of order or item encoding compared to preparation for a single test. The findings not only replicate our prior results, but also demonstrate that the allocation of attention to item or order processing can be disentangled from the time on task. Public Significance Statement When remembering a list of items, information about the items (such as ingredients in your favorite recipe) and their order (such as which ingredients to add first, second, and so on) are important theoretically and practically. Here we show that the way attention is divided between words and their list order is stable regardless of whether each item is presented for a short time (fraction of a second) or a relatively long time (several seconds). In all cases, attention proves to be more critical for order information in short-term memory, a finding relevant to many cognitive activities (including communication, eating, and learning).</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Divided Attention</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Information Storage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Verbal memory</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90cFu1DAUBVALgehQ2PAByBIbhBR4tpM4XiFoC4xU6IKwthz7pZMqsYOdAPP3eNTSAgtWXvj4yleXkKcMXjEQ8vXP3QwADGR5j2yYEqpgXMr7ZAOg6oJVXByRRyldwUE11UNyJGpRVRLqDcF2h7SNxmHoe_oOlx-Inm4XnKjxjl5Eh5FufR_iZJYheDp4-mUX4lK0GCf6CacQ9_Q0YKKfw0JPccb8LLszb4Mb_CVthwkfkwe9GRM-uTmPydf3Z-3Jx-L84sP25O15YUoJS8FlrySUTJqOMQTuoBPYSOV401uwUvHeCteJumRK1Y2pq86ZrqwaVKw3AsUxeXOdO6_dhM6iX6IZ9RyHycS9DmbQf9_4Yacvw3fNALhivM4JL24SYvi2Ylr0NCSL42g8hjVpLkXFJFOSZ_r8H3oV1uhzv6zqDBrFm_8rUUoBkkNWL6-VjSGliP3tnxnow8j6buSMn_3Z8pb-XvUuzcxGz2lvTVwGO2Kya4y5-SFMl0ozXTHxC627sDY</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Guitard, Dominic</creator><creator>Cowan, Nelson</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>The Tradeoff Between Item and Order Information in Short-Term Memory Does Not Depend on Encoding Time</title><author>Guitard, Dominic ; Cowan, Nelson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-27f970417ab11e02d0b3e879d28fc0c792fc3db36419968a65bdab458e91fa3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Divided Attention</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Information Storage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Verbal memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guitard, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guitard, Dominic</au><au>Cowan, Nelson</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Tradeoff Between Item and Order Information in Short-Term Memory Does Not Depend on Encoding Time</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>51-70</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><abstract>Participants can optimize encoding of an immediate verbal memory test for item or for order information, or they can try to be ready for either type of test. Dividing encoding between both kinds of information, however, comes at a cost. Recently, it has been shown that the cost is more severe for order information compared to item information (Guitard et al., 2022). Here, for the first time, we evaluated which factor can better account for this asymmetry by contrasting two hypotheses. According to a rate hypothesis, divided attention affects the rate of encoding more for order than for items. According to an alternative, asymptote hypothesis, divided attention does not affect the rates but diminishes the endpoint, or asymptotic level, of order encoding more than item encoding. In three experiments to distinguish these hypotheses, participants prepared for an item fragment completion test, an order reconstruction test, or both types of tests, in trials with different durations of presentation. Overall, our results were better accounted for by a model which assumes that dividing attention between preparation for item and order testing affects the asymptote of encoding more for order than for items, with no effects on the rates of order or item encoding compared to preparation for a single test. The findings not only replicate our prior results, but also demonstrate that the allocation of attention to item or order processing can be disentangled from the time on task. Public Significance Statement When remembering a list of items, information about the items (such as ingredients in your favorite recipe) and their order (such as which ingredients to add first, second, and so on) are important theoretically and practically. Here we show that the way attention is divided between words and their list order is stable regardless of whether each item is presented for a short time (fraction of a second) or a relatively long time (several seconds). In all cases, attention proves to be more critical for order information in short-term memory, a finding relevant to many cognitive activities (including communication, eating, and learning).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>36355706</pmid><doi>10.1037/xhp0001074</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-1523
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2023-01, Vol.49 (1), p.51-70
issn 0096-1523
1939-1277
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10029126
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); PsycARTICLES
subjects Attention
Divided Attention
Encoding
Female
Human
Human Information Storage
Humans
Hypotheses
Information
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Mental Recall
Short Term Memory
Verbal memory
title The Tradeoff Between Item and Order Information in Short-Term Memory Does Not Depend on Encoding Time
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A29%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Tradeoff%20Between%20Item%20and%20Order%20Information%20in%20Short-Term%20Memory%20Does%20Not%20Depend%20on%20Encoding%20Time&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Guitard,%20Dominic&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=51-70&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xhp0001074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2735171972%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a470t-27f970417ab11e02d0b3e879d28fc0c792fc3db36419968a65bdab458e91fa3e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734730720&rft_id=info:pmid/36355706&rfr_iscdi=true