Loading…
Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Is Supracrural Urethral Rerouting (Step 4) Becoming Anecdotical or Does It Remain in Force?
Webster described a step-based perineal approach for repairing the posterior urethra in patients with pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). The higher the complexity of the step, the higher the morbidity for the patient and the lower the surgical outcomes. We evaluated the outcomes of anastomotic...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2023-03, Vol.12 (6), p.2427 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fcb7f4b02ec7a7a89fc2879378dc2d2d2ff2640a28be74d9399c1a56de64523c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fcb7f4b02ec7a7a89fc2879378dc2d2d2ff2640a28be74d9399c1a56de64523c3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2427 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Yepes, Christian Oszczudlowski, Maciej Bandini, Marco Joshi, Pankaj M Alrefaey, Ahmed Bhadranavar, Shreyas Martins, Francisco E Kulkarni, Sanjay B |
description | Webster described a step-based perineal approach for repairing the posterior urethra in patients with pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). The higher the complexity of the step, the higher the morbidity for the patient and the lower the surgical outcomes. We evaluated the outcomes of anastomotic urethroplasty (especially Step 4 or higher) or substitution urethroplasty in patients with PFUI at our center. Between 2013 to 2021, we retrospectively collected data on patients with PFUI. Surgical procedures were categorized according to the Webster classification and rates of each step were reported. The success rate was defined as Qmax above 10 mL/s and no need for further treatment. In this period, 737 male patients with PFUI were surgically treated. Notably, 18.8%, 17.6%, 46%, 1.8%, and 5.6% of included patients received steps 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the abdominoperineal approach, respectively. In 68 (9.2%) patients, the substitution of urethroplasty with a pedicled preputial tube (PPT) was needed. The success rate was 69.2% in Step 4, 74.4% in the abdominoperineal approach, and 86.4% in PPT; however, recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between groups (
= 0.22). Step 4 perineal anastomotic urethroplasty represents a surgical option in the armamentarium of PFUI treatment. Indications should be carefully reviewed to improve patient selection and avoid surgical failure, stopping at the step which first gives a tension-free anastomosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm12062427 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10058563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A750301481</galeid><sourcerecordid>A750301481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fcb7f4b02ec7a7a89fc2879378dc2d2d2ff2640a28be74d9399c1a56de64523c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhoMotqy98l4C3lRka75mkvGmrK2rCxXF2uuQzZxss8wk22Sm0L_gr26W1nUr5gQSznneN5xwEHpNyQnnDfmwtj1lpGaCyWfokBEpp4Qr_nzvfoCOcl6TspQSjMqX6IDXjeJFcoh-fzPBrKCHMODo8A_obr3F82TsMCbAVwmG62Q6vAjrMd19xIuML8dNKadxm97Vf0KK4-DDCh9fDrDB4h3-BDb228wsgG3j4G3hYsLnETJeDEXSGx9w2fOYLJy-Qi-c6TIcPZ4TdDX__Ovs6_Ti-5fF2exiaoWUw9TZpXRiSRhYaaRRjbNMyYZL1VrWlnCO1YIYppYgRdvwprHUVHULtagYt3yCTh98N-Oyh9aW1ksHepN8b9Kdjsbrp5Xgr_Uq3mpKSKWqmheH40eHFG9GyIPufbbQdSZAHLNmsmEVobJ8_gS9_QddxzGF0t-WonUlmCB_qZXpQPvgYnnYbk31TFaEEyoULdTJf6gSLfTexgDOl_wTwfsHgU0x5wRu1yQlejs-em98Cv1m_1927J9h4fc9678g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791654240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Is Supracrural Urethral Rerouting (Step 4) Becoming Anecdotical or Does It Remain in Force?</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Yepes, Christian ; Oszczudlowski, Maciej ; Bandini, Marco ; Joshi, Pankaj M ; Alrefaey, Ahmed ; Bhadranavar, Shreyas ; Martins, Francisco E ; Kulkarni, Sanjay B</creator><creatorcontrib>Yepes, Christian ; Oszczudlowski, Maciej ; Bandini, Marco ; Joshi, Pankaj M ; Alrefaey, Ahmed ; Bhadranavar, Shreyas ; Martins, Francisco E ; Kulkarni, Sanjay B</creatorcontrib><description>Webster described a step-based perineal approach for repairing the posterior urethra in patients with pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). The higher the complexity of the step, the higher the morbidity for the patient and the lower the surgical outcomes. We evaluated the outcomes of anastomotic urethroplasty (especially Step 4 or higher) or substitution urethroplasty in patients with PFUI at our center. Between 2013 to 2021, we retrospectively collected data on patients with PFUI. Surgical procedures were categorized according to the Webster classification and rates of each step were reported. The success rate was defined as Qmax above 10 mL/s and no need for further treatment. In this period, 737 male patients with PFUI were surgically treated. Notably, 18.8%, 17.6%, 46%, 1.8%, and 5.6% of included patients received steps 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the abdominoperineal approach, respectively. In 68 (9.2%) patients, the substitution of urethroplasty with a pedicled preputial tube (PPT) was needed. The success rate was 69.2% in Step 4, 74.4% in the abdominoperineal approach, and 86.4% in PPT; however, recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between groups (
= 0.22). Step 4 perineal anastomotic urethroplasty represents a surgical option in the armamentarium of PFUI treatment. Indications should be carefully reviewed to improve patient selection and avoid surgical failure, stopping at the step which first gives a tension-free anastomosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062427</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36983427</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bladder ; Care and treatment ; Catheters ; Clinical medicine ; Erectile dysfunction ; Fracture ; Injuries ; Patients ; Pelvis ; Penis ; Prostate ; Questionnaires ; Statistical analysis ; Success ; Surgery ; Trauma ; Urethral diseases ; Urinalysis ; Urinary organs ; Urogenital system</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-03, Vol.12 (6), p.2427</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fcb7f4b02ec7a7a89fc2879378dc2d2d2ff2640a28be74d9399c1a56de64523c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fcb7f4b02ec7a7a89fc2879378dc2d2d2ff2640a28be74d9399c1a56de64523c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5718-6964</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2791654240/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2791654240?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36983427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yepes, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oszczudlowski, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Pankaj M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alrefaey, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhadranavar, Shreyas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Francisco E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Sanjay B</creatorcontrib><title>Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Is Supracrural Urethral Rerouting (Step 4) Becoming Anecdotical or Does It Remain in Force?</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>Webster described a step-based perineal approach for repairing the posterior urethra in patients with pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). The higher the complexity of the step, the higher the morbidity for the patient and the lower the surgical outcomes. We evaluated the outcomes of anastomotic urethroplasty (especially Step 4 or higher) or substitution urethroplasty in patients with PFUI at our center. Between 2013 to 2021, we retrospectively collected data on patients with PFUI. Surgical procedures were categorized according to the Webster classification and rates of each step were reported. The success rate was defined as Qmax above 10 mL/s and no need for further treatment. In this period, 737 male patients with PFUI were surgically treated. Notably, 18.8%, 17.6%, 46%, 1.8%, and 5.6% of included patients received steps 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the abdominoperineal approach, respectively. In 68 (9.2%) patients, the substitution of urethroplasty with a pedicled preputial tube (PPT) was needed. The success rate was 69.2% in Step 4, 74.4% in the abdominoperineal approach, and 86.4% in PPT; however, recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between groups (
= 0.22). Step 4 perineal anastomotic urethroplasty represents a surgical option in the armamentarium of PFUI treatment. Indications should be carefully reviewed to improve patient selection and avoid surgical failure, stopping at the step which first gives a tension-free anastomosis.</description><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Erectile dysfunction</subject><subject>Fracture</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Penis</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Urethral diseases</subject><subject>Urinalysis</subject><subject>Urinary organs</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhoMotqy98l4C3lRka75mkvGmrK2rCxXF2uuQzZxss8wk22Sm0L_gr26W1nUr5gQSznneN5xwEHpNyQnnDfmwtj1lpGaCyWfokBEpp4Qr_nzvfoCOcl6TspQSjMqX6IDXjeJFcoh-fzPBrKCHMODo8A_obr3F82TsMCbAVwmG62Q6vAjrMd19xIuML8dNKadxm97Vf0KK4-DDCh9fDrDB4h3-BDb228wsgG3j4G3hYsLnETJeDEXSGx9w2fOYLJy-Qi-c6TIcPZ4TdDX__Ovs6_Ti-5fF2exiaoWUw9TZpXRiSRhYaaRRjbNMyYZL1VrWlnCO1YIYppYgRdvwprHUVHULtagYt3yCTh98N-Oyh9aW1ksHepN8b9Kdjsbrp5Xgr_Uq3mpKSKWqmheH40eHFG9GyIPufbbQdSZAHLNmsmEVobJ8_gS9_QddxzGF0t-WonUlmCB_qZXpQPvgYnnYbk31TFaEEyoULdTJf6gSLfTexgDOl_wTwfsHgU0x5wRu1yQlejs-em98Cv1m_1927J9h4fc9678g</recordid><startdate>20230322</startdate><enddate>20230322</enddate><creator>Yepes, Christian</creator><creator>Oszczudlowski, Maciej</creator><creator>Bandini, Marco</creator><creator>Joshi, Pankaj M</creator><creator>Alrefaey, Ahmed</creator><creator>Bhadranavar, Shreyas</creator><creator>Martins, Francisco E</creator><creator>Kulkarni, Sanjay B</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5718-6964</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230322</creationdate><title>Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Is Supracrural Urethral Rerouting (Step 4) Becoming Anecdotical or Does It Remain in Force?</title><author>Yepes, Christian ; Oszczudlowski, Maciej ; Bandini, Marco ; Joshi, Pankaj M ; Alrefaey, Ahmed ; Bhadranavar, Shreyas ; Martins, Francisco E ; Kulkarni, Sanjay B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fcb7f4b02ec7a7a89fc2879378dc2d2d2ff2640a28be74d9399c1a56de64523c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Erectile dysfunction</topic><topic>Fracture</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Penis</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Urethral diseases</topic><topic>Urinalysis</topic><topic>Urinary organs</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yepes, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oszczudlowski, Maciej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Pankaj M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alrefaey, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhadranavar, Shreyas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Francisco E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Sanjay B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yepes, Christian</au><au>Oszczudlowski, Maciej</au><au>Bandini, Marco</au><au>Joshi, Pankaj M</au><au>Alrefaey, Ahmed</au><au>Bhadranavar, Shreyas</au><au>Martins, Francisco E</au><au>Kulkarni, Sanjay B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Is Supracrural Urethral Rerouting (Step 4) Becoming Anecdotical or Does It Remain in Force?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2023-03-22</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2427</spage><pages>2427-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Webster described a step-based perineal approach for repairing the posterior urethra in patients with pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). The higher the complexity of the step, the higher the morbidity for the patient and the lower the surgical outcomes. We evaluated the outcomes of anastomotic urethroplasty (especially Step 4 or higher) or substitution urethroplasty in patients with PFUI at our center. Between 2013 to 2021, we retrospectively collected data on patients with PFUI. Surgical procedures were categorized according to the Webster classification and rates of each step were reported. The success rate was defined as Qmax above 10 mL/s and no need for further treatment. In this period, 737 male patients with PFUI were surgically treated. Notably, 18.8%, 17.6%, 46%, 1.8%, and 5.6% of included patients received steps 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the abdominoperineal approach, respectively. In 68 (9.2%) patients, the substitution of urethroplasty with a pedicled preputial tube (PPT) was needed. The success rate was 69.2% in Step 4, 74.4% in the abdominoperineal approach, and 86.4% in PPT; however, recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between groups (
= 0.22). Step 4 perineal anastomotic urethroplasty represents a surgical option in the armamentarium of PFUI treatment. Indications should be carefully reviewed to improve patient selection and avoid surgical failure, stopping at the step which first gives a tension-free anastomosis.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36983427</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm12062427</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5718-6964</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-03, Vol.12 (6), p.2427 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10058563 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Bladder Care and treatment Catheters Clinical medicine Erectile dysfunction Fracture Injuries Patients Pelvis Penis Prostate Questionnaires Statistical analysis Success Surgery Trauma Urethral diseases Urinalysis Urinary organs Urogenital system |
title | Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury: Is Supracrural Urethral Rerouting (Step 4) Becoming Anecdotical or Does It Remain in Force? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T06%3A25%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20Pelvic%20Fracture%20Urethral%20Injury:%20Is%20Supracrural%20Urethral%20Rerouting%20(Step%204)%20Becoming%20Anecdotical%20or%20Does%20It%20Remain%20in%20Force?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Yepes,%20Christian&rft.date=2023-03-22&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2427&rft.pages=2427-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm12062427&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA750301481%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-fcb7f4b02ec7a7a89fc2879378dc2d2d2ff2640a28be74d9399c1a56de64523c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791654240&rft_id=info:pmid/36983427&rft_galeid=A750301481&rfr_iscdi=true |