Telephone triage for 2-week-wait cancer clinics: a viable alternative to face-to-face clinics?

• Published in: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2023-04, Vol.105 (4), p.348-351
• Main Authors: Garrard, A, Bashyam, A, Pitkin, L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ambulatory Care Facilities; Appointments and Schedules; Cancer Diagnostic Pathways; Humans; Neoplasms - diagnosis; Neoplasms - therapy; Referral and Consultation; Telephone; Triage
• ISSN: 0035-8843; 1478-7083
• DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0103

Head and neck cancer services have had to adapt to reduce the risk of exposure to patients and staff during the pandemic. Telephone consultations as a first point contact have been adopted in some centres. It is important that this does not lead to delays in diagnosis. Our hospital adopted a telephone triage service and we aim to describe the implications of this structure. Data were collected from all new patients referred to the head and neck 2-week-wait (2ww) pathway from June to September of 2019 and 2020. Days between first clinic appointment and cancer or noncancer diagnosis were calculated. Statistical tests were performed between years. A total of 215 patients in 2019, and 165 in 2020 were included; 23 (6.8%) cancer diagnoses were identified across 2019 and 2020 groups. The cancer group had a mean time from first consultation to date of diagnosis of 16.33 days in 2019 and 12.81 days in 2020. There was no significant difference in days until diagnosis between 2019 and 2020 ( =0.05). In the noncancer group there was no significant difference in days until noncancer diagnosis ( =0.05). In 2020 26.1% ( =43) patients did not need to be seen face-to-face (f2f) under the 2ww pathway after telephone triage. No difference in diagnosis timing was observed between cancer and noncancer patents in 2019 and 2020. Telephone clinics reduce the total number of f2f appointments required. Reduction in the number of f2f appointments may have other benefits in saving time and environmental costs.