Loading…

Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract Background The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2023-04, Vol.69 (4), p.422-428
Main Authors: Fang, Michael, Wang, Dan, Rooney, Mary R, Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B, Coresh, Josef, Aurora, R Nisha, Punjabi, Naresh M, Selvin, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3
container_end_page 428
container_issue 4
container_start_page 422
container_title Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)
container_volume 69
creator Fang, Michael
Wang, Dan
Rooney, Mary R
Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B
Coresh, Josef
Aurora, R Nisha
Punjabi, Naresh M
Selvin, Elizabeth
description Abstract Background The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor. Results Median wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference >1 percentage points (>11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4. Conclusions GMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/clinchem/hvac210
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10073330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/clinchem/hvac210</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2773125290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLAzEQxoMoWqt3T5KjIquTxz5yEvFRCxU96Dlk04ld2d3UZLfgf-9Kq-jJ0zDMb775mI-QIwbnDJS4sHXV2gU2F4uVsZzBFhmxVEBSpBnbJiMAUIliMt8j-zG-Da3Mi2yX7IksFwWXakTunzA4HxrTWqTe0W6BdFL31kekD6Y1r9hg29FpO6-s6XygJ5OH6SmtWvr8sUTK6U1lSuwwHpAdZ-qIh5s6Ji93t8_X98nscTK9vpolVgrRJQqYTEuZZyVHZGlZZFiW6OZSWSmhdGCkU86KAqxwzqSCFbywmUiVAp7DXIzJ5Vp32ZcNzu3gLphaL0PVmPChvan030lbLfSrX2kGkAshYFA42SgE_95j7HRTRYt1bVr0fdQ8zwXjKVdfKKxRG3yMAd3PHQb6KwH9nYDeJDCsHP_297Pw_fIBOFsDvl_-L_cJ4BCTfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773125290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Fang, Michael ; Wang, Dan ; Rooney, Mary R ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B ; Coresh, Josef ; Aurora, R Nisha ; Punjabi, Naresh M ; Selvin, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Michael ; Wang, Dan ; Rooney, Mary R ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B ; Coresh, Josef ; Aurora, R Nisha ; Punjabi, Naresh M ; Selvin, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor. Results Median wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference &gt;1 percentage points (&gt;11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4. Conclusions GMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36738249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Blood Glucose ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Female ; Glucose ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia - diagnosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2023-04, Vol.69 (4), p.422-428</ispartof><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2849-1780 ; 0000-0001-6923-7151 ; 0000-0002-8460-1617 ; 0000-0002-5607-4848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36738249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, Mary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coresh, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurora, R Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punjabi, Naresh M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvin, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes</title><title>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor. Results Median wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference &gt;1 percentage points (&gt;11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4. Conclusions GMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153.</description><subject>Blood Glucose</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0009-9147</issn><issn>1530-8561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctLAzEQxoMoWqt3T5KjIquTxz5yEvFRCxU96Dlk04ld2d3UZLfgf-9Kq-jJ0zDMb775mI-QIwbnDJS4sHXV2gU2F4uVsZzBFhmxVEBSpBnbJiMAUIliMt8j-zG-Da3Mi2yX7IksFwWXakTunzA4HxrTWqTe0W6BdFL31kekD6Y1r9hg29FpO6-s6XygJ5OH6SmtWvr8sUTK6U1lSuwwHpAdZ-qIh5s6Ji93t8_X98nscTK9vpolVgrRJQqYTEuZZyVHZGlZZFiW6OZSWSmhdGCkU86KAqxwzqSCFbywmUiVAp7DXIzJ5Vp32ZcNzu3gLphaL0PVmPChvan030lbLfSrX2kGkAshYFA42SgE_95j7HRTRYt1bVr0fdQ8zwXjKVdfKKxRG3yMAd3PHQb6KwH9nYDeJDCsHP_297Pw_fIBOFsDvl_-L_cJ4BCTfQ</recordid><startdate>20230403</startdate><enddate>20230403</enddate><creator>Fang, Michael</creator><creator>Wang, Dan</creator><creator>Rooney, Mary R</creator><creator>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B</creator><creator>Coresh, Josef</creator><creator>Aurora, R Nisha</creator><creator>Punjabi, Naresh M</creator><creator>Selvin, Elizabeth</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2849-1780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6923-7151</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-1617</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-4848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230403</creationdate><title>Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes</title><author>Fang, Michael ; Wang, Dan ; Rooney, Mary R ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B ; Coresh, Josef ; Aurora, R Nisha ; Punjabi, Naresh M ; Selvin, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Blood Glucose</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, Mary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coresh, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurora, R Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punjabi, Naresh M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvin, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Michael</au><au>Wang, Dan</au><au>Rooney, Mary R</au><au>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B</au><au>Coresh, Josef</au><au>Aurora, R Nisha</au><au>Punjabi, Naresh M</au><au>Selvin, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><date>2023-04-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>422-428</pages><issn>0009-9147</issn><eissn>1530-8561</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor. Results Median wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference &gt;1 percentage points (&gt;11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4. Conclusions GMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36738249</pmid><doi>10.1093/clinchem/hvac210</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2849-1780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6923-7151</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-1617</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-4848</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9147
ispartof Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2023-04, Vol.69 (4), p.422-428
issn 0009-9147
1530-8561
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10073330
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Blood Glucose
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Female
Glucose
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Hypoglycemia - diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Young Adult
title Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A07%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20the%20Glucose%20Management%20Indicator%20(GMI)%20in%20Type%202%20Diabetes&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Fang,%20Michael&rft.date=2023-04-03&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=422-428&rft.issn=0009-9147&rft.eissn=1530-8561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/clinchem/hvac210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2773125290%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773125290&rft_id=info:pmid/36738249&rft_oup_id=10.1093/clinchem/hvac210&rfr_iscdi=true