Loading…
Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes
Abstract Background The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2023-04, Vol.69 (4), p.422-428 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3 |
container_end_page | 428 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 422 |
container_title | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Fang, Michael Wang, Dan Rooney, Mary R Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B Coresh, Josef Aurora, R Nisha Punjabi, Naresh M Selvin, Elizabeth |
description | Abstract
Background
The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor.
Results
Median wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference >1 percentage points (>11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4.
Conclusions
GMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice.
Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/clinchem/hvac210 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10073330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/clinchem/hvac210</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2773125290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLAzEQxoMoWqt3T5KjIquTxz5yEvFRCxU96Dlk04ld2d3UZLfgf-9Kq-jJ0zDMb775mI-QIwbnDJS4sHXV2gU2F4uVsZzBFhmxVEBSpBnbJiMAUIliMt8j-zG-Da3Mi2yX7IksFwWXakTunzA4HxrTWqTe0W6BdFL31kekD6Y1r9hg29FpO6-s6XygJ5OH6SmtWvr8sUTK6U1lSuwwHpAdZ-qIh5s6Ji93t8_X98nscTK9vpolVgrRJQqYTEuZZyVHZGlZZFiW6OZSWSmhdGCkU86KAqxwzqSCFbywmUiVAp7DXIzJ5Vp32ZcNzu3gLphaL0PVmPChvan030lbLfSrX2kGkAshYFA42SgE_95j7HRTRYt1bVr0fdQ8zwXjKVdfKKxRG3yMAd3PHQb6KwH9nYDeJDCsHP_297Pw_fIBOFsDvl_-L_cJ4BCTfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773125290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Fang, Michael ; Wang, Dan ; Rooney, Mary R ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B ; Coresh, Josef ; Aurora, R Nisha ; Punjabi, Naresh M ; Selvin, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Michael ; Wang, Dan ; Rooney, Mary R ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B ; Coresh, Josef ; Aurora, R Nisha ; Punjabi, Naresh M ; Selvin, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor.
Results
Median wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference >1 percentage points (>11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4.
Conclusions
GMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice.
Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36738249</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Blood Glucose ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Female ; Glucose ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia - diagnosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2023-04, Vol.69 (4), p.422-428</ispartof><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2849-1780 ; 0000-0001-6923-7151 ; 0000-0002-8460-1617 ; 0000-0002-5607-4848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36738249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, Mary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coresh, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurora, R Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punjabi, Naresh M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvin, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes</title><title>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor.
Results
Median wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference >1 percentage points (>11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4.
Conclusions
GMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice.
Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153.</description><subject>Blood Glucose</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0009-9147</issn><issn>1530-8561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctLAzEQxoMoWqt3T5KjIquTxz5yEvFRCxU96Dlk04ld2d3UZLfgf-9Kq-jJ0zDMb775mI-QIwbnDJS4sHXV2gU2F4uVsZzBFhmxVEBSpBnbJiMAUIliMt8j-zG-Da3Mi2yX7IksFwWXakTunzA4HxrTWqTe0W6BdFL31kekD6Y1r9hg29FpO6-s6XygJ5OH6SmtWvr8sUTK6U1lSuwwHpAdZ-qIh5s6Ji93t8_X98nscTK9vpolVgrRJQqYTEuZZyVHZGlZZFiW6OZSWSmhdGCkU86KAqxwzqSCFbywmUiVAp7DXIzJ5Vp32ZcNzu3gLphaL0PVmPChvan030lbLfSrX2kGkAshYFA42SgE_95j7HRTRYt1bVr0fdQ8zwXjKVdfKKxRG3yMAd3PHQb6KwH9nYDeJDCsHP_297Pw_fIBOFsDvl_-L_cJ4BCTfQ</recordid><startdate>20230403</startdate><enddate>20230403</enddate><creator>Fang, Michael</creator><creator>Wang, Dan</creator><creator>Rooney, Mary R</creator><creator>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B</creator><creator>Coresh, Josef</creator><creator>Aurora, R Nisha</creator><creator>Punjabi, Naresh M</creator><creator>Selvin, Elizabeth</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2849-1780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6923-7151</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-1617</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-4848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230403</creationdate><title>Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes</title><author>Fang, Michael ; Wang, Dan ; Rooney, Mary R ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B ; Coresh, Josef ; Aurora, R Nisha ; Punjabi, Naresh M ; Selvin, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Blood Glucose</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, Mary R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coresh, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurora, R Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punjabi, Naresh M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvin, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Michael</au><au>Wang, Dan</au><au>Rooney, Mary R</au><au>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B</au><au>Coresh, Josef</au><au>Aurora, R Nisha</au><au>Punjabi, Naresh M</au><au>Selvin, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chem</addtitle><date>2023-04-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>422-428</pages><issn>0009-9147</issn><eissn>1530-8561</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
The glucose management indicator (GMI) is an estimated measure of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) recommended for the management of persons with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, GMI was derived primarily in young adults with type 1 diabetes, and its performance in patients with type 2 diabetes is poorly characterized.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study in 144 adults with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes not using insulin (mean age: 59.4 years; 45.1% female). HbA1c was measured at the study screening visit. Participants simultaneously wore 2 CGM sensors (Dexcom G4 and Abbott Libre Pro) for up to 4 weeks (2 weeks at baseline and 2 weeks at the 3-month follow-up visit). GMI was calculated using all available CGM data for each sensor.
Results
Median wear time was 27 days (IQR: 23–29) for the Dexcom G4 and 28 days (IQR: 24–29) for the Libre Pro. The mean difference between HbA1c and GMI was small (0.12–0.14 percentage points) (approximately 2 mmol/mol). However, the 2 measures were only moderately correlated (r = 0.68–0.71), and there was substantial variability in GMI at any given value of HbA1c (root mean squared error: 0.66–0.69 percentage points [7 to 8 mmol/mol]). Between 36% and 43% of participants had an absolute difference between HbA1c and GMI ≥0.5 percentage points (≥5 mmol/mol), and 9% to 18% had an absolute difference >1 percentage points (>11 mmol/mol). Discordance was higher in the Libre Pro than the Dexcom G4.
Conclusions
GMI may be an unreliable measure of glycemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes and should be interpreted cautiously in clinical practice.
Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02454153.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36738249</pmid><doi>10.1093/clinchem/hvac210</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2849-1780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6923-7151</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-1617</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-4848</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-9147 |
ispartof | Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.), 2023-04, Vol.69 (4), p.422-428 |
issn | 0009-9147 1530-8561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10073330 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Blood Glucose Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Female Glucose Glycated Hemoglobin Humans Hypoglycemia - diagnosis Male Middle Aged Prospective Studies Young Adult |
title | Performance of the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) in Type 2 Diabetes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A07%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20the%20Glucose%20Management%20Indicator%20(GMI)%20in%20Type%202%20Diabetes&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20chemistry%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Fang,%20Michael&rft.date=2023-04-03&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=422-428&rft.issn=0009-9147&rft.eissn=1530-8561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/clinchem/hvac210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2773125290%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-90145b476b2ee15b86ebbefd49c440bf0a4f9fc380c3ffa531828c635990270d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773125290&rft_id=info:pmid/36738249&rft_oup_id=10.1093/clinchem/hvac210&rfr_iscdi=true |