Loading…
Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers
Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which fl...
Saved in:
Published in: | British Journal of Industrial Medicine 1986-05, Vol.43 (5), p.300-306 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193 |
container_end_page | 306 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 300 |
container_title | British Journal of Industrial Medicine |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Elwood, J H Elwood, P C Campbell, M J Stanford, C F Chivers, A Hey, I Brewster, L Sweetnam, P M |
description | Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which flax processing had been a major source of employment. The MRC questionnaire on respiratory symptoms was administered and Vitalograph tracings recorded on subjects aged 40 to 74 inclusive. An occupational history was taken at the end of each interview. Lung function in ex-flax workers was slightly lower than in control subjects never exposed to flax dust, but the presence of a positive interaction with age meant that differences were apparent only in the younger subjects. Over about the age of 65 the lung function in the ex-flax workers was comparable with that of the controls and overall the loss was at most about half that due to light smoking (1-14 cigarettes a day). The association between a "dust exposure score" and lung function was inconsistent in the two sexes. In men there was a small decrement with increasing dust exposure. In women there was also a small decrement, but a positive interaction with age meant that the women with the highest dust exposure scores had a lower loss with increasing age than the women with the least dust exposure. There was an excess in symptoms in the ex-flax workers but the size of the excess was greater than would be expected from the lung function results. It is possible that, although the survey was conducted without explicit reference to the flax industry, knowledge throughout Northern Ireland that many flax workers have been awarded compensation on the grounds of respiratory disablement may have led to an increased reporting of symptoms in the ex-flax workers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/oem.43.5.300 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1007653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27726186</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27726186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFrFDEYxYNY6rZ68yosKBWhsyZfJvmSiyCL2kKpKKVILyEzk9VsZyZrMqu7_70pu4zWg55yeD9e3vseIU8ZnTHG5evgulnJZ2LGKX1AJqxEWqAG-ZBMKKVYMIrwiByltKSUceRwSA45UlQSJ-TVZ5dWPtohxO208clWvvXDdur7qdsUi9Zupj9DvHUxPSYHC9sm92T_HpOr9--u5mfFxccP5_O3F0UlNB2KWlEALhrXsKpxrNQSBAAIXauyqpRsKHWIdaW5K2VZ5pxKK-nAcdVUTPNj8mZnu1pXnWtq1w_RtmYVfWfj1gTrzX2l99_M1_DDsNxVCp4NTvYGMXxfuzSYzqfata3tXVgnA1pxoRj8F8zZQaHEDD7_C1yGdezzEQxDZABawF3w0x1Vx5BSdIsxM6PmbiiThzIlN8LkoTL-7M-eI7xfJusv9rpNtW0X0fa1TyOmEHMJ_G2zTHnCUQZEkEzJrBc73afBbUbdxluTP0FhLq_n5tMNvRFfri_NWeZf7viqW_67wC_PGr8P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771229529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers</title><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Elwood, J H ; Elwood, P C ; Campbell, M J ; Stanford, C F ; Chivers, A ; Hey, I ; Brewster, L ; Sweetnam, P M</creator><creatorcontrib>Elwood, J H ; Elwood, P C ; Campbell, M J ; Stanford, C F ; Chivers, A ; Hey, I ; Brewster, L ; Sweetnam, P M</creatorcontrib><description>Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which flax processing had been a major source of employment. The MRC questionnaire on respiratory symptoms was administered and Vitalograph tracings recorded on subjects aged 40 to 74 inclusive. An occupational history was taken at the end of each interview. Lung function in ex-flax workers was slightly lower than in control subjects never exposed to flax dust, but the presence of a positive interaction with age meant that differences were apparent only in the younger subjects. Over about the age of 65 the lung function in the ex-flax workers was comparable with that of the controls and overall the loss was at most about half that due to light smoking (1-14 cigarettes a day). The association between a "dust exposure score" and lung function was inconsistent in the two sexes. In men there was a small decrement with increasing dust exposure. In women there was also a small decrement, but a positive interaction with age meant that the women with the highest dust exposure scores had a lower loss with increasing age than the women with the least dust exposure. There was an excess in symptoms in the ex-flax workers but the size of the excess was greater than would be expected from the lung function results. It is possible that, although the survey was conducted without explicit reference to the flax industry, knowledge throughout Northern Ireland that many flax workers have been awarded compensation on the grounds of respiratory disablement may have led to an increased reporting of symptoms in the ex-flax workers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1072</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/oem.43.5.300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3707867</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJIMAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchitis - etiology ; Byssinosis ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; Chronic bronchitis ; Chronic Disease ; Cigarette smoking ; Disabilities ; Female ; Forced Expiratory Volume ; Humans ; Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.) ; Linum usitatissimum ; Lungs ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Northern Ireland ; Occupational Diseases - etiology ; Respiratory symptoms ; Respiratory Tract Diseases - etiology ; Textile Industry ; Time Factors ; Toxicology ; Vital Capacity ; Working women</subject><ispartof>British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986-05, Vol.43 (5), p.300-306</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 British Journal of Industrial Medicine</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD May 1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/43/5/300.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/43/5/300.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,723,776,780,881,3183,23550,27901,27902,53766,53768,58213,58446,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8775817$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3707867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elwood, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elwood, P C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, C F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hey, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewster, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweetnam, P M</creatorcontrib><title>Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers</title><title>British Journal of Industrial Medicine</title><addtitle>Br J Ind Med</addtitle><description>Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which flax processing had been a major source of employment. The MRC questionnaire on respiratory symptoms was administered and Vitalograph tracings recorded on subjects aged 40 to 74 inclusive. An occupational history was taken at the end of each interview. Lung function in ex-flax workers was slightly lower than in control subjects never exposed to flax dust, but the presence of a positive interaction with age meant that differences were apparent only in the younger subjects. Over about the age of 65 the lung function in the ex-flax workers was comparable with that of the controls and overall the loss was at most about half that due to light smoking (1-14 cigarettes a day). The association between a "dust exposure score" and lung function was inconsistent in the two sexes. In men there was a small decrement with increasing dust exposure. In women there was also a small decrement, but a positive interaction with age meant that the women with the highest dust exposure scores had a lower loss with increasing age than the women with the least dust exposure. There was an excess in symptoms in the ex-flax workers but the size of the excess was greater than would be expected from the lung function results. It is possible that, although the survey was conducted without explicit reference to the flax industry, knowledge throughout Northern Ireland that many flax workers have been awarded compensation on the grounds of respiratory disablement may have led to an increased reporting of symptoms in the ex-flax workers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchitis - etiology</subject><subject>Byssinosis</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>Chronic bronchitis</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forced Expiratory Volume</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)</subject><subject>Linum usitatissimum</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Northern Ireland</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Respiratory symptoms</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Textile Industry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Vital Capacity</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>0007-1072</issn><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFrFDEYxYNY6rZ68yosKBWhsyZfJvmSiyCL2kKpKKVILyEzk9VsZyZrMqu7_70pu4zWg55yeD9e3vseIU8ZnTHG5evgulnJZ2LGKX1AJqxEWqAG-ZBMKKVYMIrwiByltKSUceRwSA45UlQSJ-TVZ5dWPtohxO208clWvvXDdur7qdsUi9Zupj9DvHUxPSYHC9sm92T_HpOr9--u5mfFxccP5_O3F0UlNB2KWlEALhrXsKpxrNQSBAAIXauyqpRsKHWIdaW5K2VZ5pxKK-nAcdVUTPNj8mZnu1pXnWtq1w_RtmYVfWfj1gTrzX2l99_M1_DDsNxVCp4NTvYGMXxfuzSYzqfata3tXVgnA1pxoRj8F8zZQaHEDD7_C1yGdezzEQxDZABawF3w0x1Vx5BSdIsxM6PmbiiThzIlN8LkoTL-7M-eI7xfJusv9rpNtW0X0fa1TyOmEHMJ_G2zTHnCUQZEkEzJrBc73afBbUbdxluTP0FhLq_n5tMNvRFfri_NWeZf7viqW_67wC_PGr8P</recordid><startdate>19860501</startdate><enddate>19860501</enddate><creator>Elwood, J H</creator><creator>Elwood, P C</creator><creator>Campbell, M J</creator><creator>Stanford, C F</creator><creator>Chivers, A</creator><creator>Hey, I</creator><creator>Brewster, L</creator><creator>Sweetnam, P M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860501</creationdate><title>Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers</title><author>Elwood, J H ; Elwood, P C ; Campbell, M J ; Stanford, C F ; Chivers, A ; Hey, I ; Brewster, L ; Sweetnam, P M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchitis - etiology</topic><topic>Byssinosis</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>Chronic bronchitis</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forced Expiratory Volume</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)</topic><topic>Linum usitatissimum</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Northern Ireland</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Respiratory symptoms</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Textile Industry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Vital Capacity</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elwood, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elwood, P C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, C F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hey, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewster, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweetnam, P M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British Journal of Industrial Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elwood, J H</au><au>Elwood, P C</au><au>Campbell, M J</au><au>Stanford, C F</au><au>Chivers, A</au><au>Hey, I</au><au>Brewster, L</au><au>Sweetnam, P M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers</atitle><jtitle>British Journal of Industrial Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ind Med</addtitle><date>1986-05-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>300-306</pages><issn>0007-1072</issn><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><coden>BJIMAG</coden><abstract>Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which flax processing had been a major source of employment. The MRC questionnaire on respiratory symptoms was administered and Vitalograph tracings recorded on subjects aged 40 to 74 inclusive. An occupational history was taken at the end of each interview. Lung function in ex-flax workers was slightly lower than in control subjects never exposed to flax dust, but the presence of a positive interaction with age meant that differences were apparent only in the younger subjects. Over about the age of 65 the lung function in the ex-flax workers was comparable with that of the controls and overall the loss was at most about half that due to light smoking (1-14 cigarettes a day). The association between a "dust exposure score" and lung function was inconsistent in the two sexes. In men there was a small decrement with increasing dust exposure. In women there was also a small decrement, but a positive interaction with age meant that the women with the highest dust exposure scores had a lower loss with increasing age than the women with the least dust exposure. There was an excess in symptoms in the ex-flax workers but the size of the excess was greater than would be expected from the lung function results. It is possible that, although the survey was conducted without explicit reference to the flax industry, knowledge throughout Northern Ireland that many flax workers have been awarded compensation on the grounds of respiratory disablement may have led to an increased reporting of symptoms in the ex-flax workers.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>3707867</pmid><doi>10.1136/oem.43.5.300</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1072 |
ispartof | British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986-05, Vol.43 (5), p.300-306 |
issn | 0007-1072 1351-0711 1470-7926 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1007653 |
source | PubMed Central (PMC); BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Bronchitis - etiology Byssinosis Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases Chronic bronchitis Chronic Disease Cigarette smoking Disabilities Female Forced Expiratory Volume Humans Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.) Linum usitatissimum Lungs Male Medical sciences Men Middle Aged Northern Ireland Occupational Diseases - etiology Respiratory symptoms Respiratory Tract Diseases - etiology Textile Industry Time Factors Toxicology Vital Capacity Working women |
title | Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T12%3A46%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Respiratory%20disability%20in%20ex-flax%20workers&rft.jtitle=British%20Journal%20of%20Industrial%20Medicine&rft.au=Elwood,%20J%20H&rft.date=1986-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=300-306&rft.issn=0007-1072&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft.coden=BJIMAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/oem.43.5.300&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E27726186%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771229529&rft_id=info:pmid/3707867&rft_jstor_id=27726186&rfr_iscdi=true |