Loading…

Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers

Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which fl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Journal of Industrial Medicine 1986-05, Vol.43 (5), p.300-306
Main Authors: Elwood, J H, Elwood, P C, Campbell, M J, Stanford, C F, Chivers, A, Hey, I, Brewster, L, Sweetnam, P M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193
container_end_page 306
container_issue 5
container_start_page 300
container_title British Journal of Industrial Medicine
container_volume 43
creator Elwood, J H
Elwood, P C
Campbell, M J
Stanford, C F
Chivers, A
Hey, I
Brewster, L
Sweetnam, P M
description Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which flax processing had been a major source of employment. The MRC questionnaire on respiratory symptoms was administered and Vitalograph tracings recorded on subjects aged 40 to 74 inclusive. An occupational history was taken at the end of each interview. Lung function in ex-flax workers was slightly lower than in control subjects never exposed to flax dust, but the presence of a positive interaction with age meant that differences were apparent only in the younger subjects. Over about the age of 65 the lung function in the ex-flax workers was comparable with that of the controls and overall the loss was at most about half that due to light smoking (1-14 cigarettes a day). The association between a "dust exposure score" and lung function was inconsistent in the two sexes. In men there was a small decrement with increasing dust exposure. In women there was also a small decrement, but a positive interaction with age meant that the women with the highest dust exposure scores had a lower loss with increasing age than the women with the least dust exposure. There was an excess in symptoms in the ex-flax workers but the size of the excess was greater than would be expected from the lung function results. It is possible that, although the survey was conducted without explicit reference to the flax industry, knowledge throughout Northern Ireland that many flax workers have been awarded compensation on the grounds of respiratory disablement may have led to an increased reporting of symptoms in the ex-flax workers.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/oem.43.5.300
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1007653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27726186</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27726186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFrFDEYxYNY6rZ68yosKBWhsyZfJvmSiyCL2kKpKKVILyEzk9VsZyZrMqu7_70pu4zWg55yeD9e3vseIU8ZnTHG5evgulnJZ2LGKX1AJqxEWqAG-ZBMKKVYMIrwiByltKSUceRwSA45UlQSJ-TVZ5dWPtohxO208clWvvXDdur7qdsUi9Zupj9DvHUxPSYHC9sm92T_HpOr9--u5mfFxccP5_O3F0UlNB2KWlEALhrXsKpxrNQSBAAIXauyqpRsKHWIdaW5K2VZ5pxKK-nAcdVUTPNj8mZnu1pXnWtq1w_RtmYVfWfj1gTrzX2l99_M1_DDsNxVCp4NTvYGMXxfuzSYzqfata3tXVgnA1pxoRj8F8zZQaHEDD7_C1yGdezzEQxDZABawF3w0x1Vx5BSdIsxM6PmbiiThzIlN8LkoTL-7M-eI7xfJusv9rpNtW0X0fa1TyOmEHMJ_G2zTHnCUQZEkEzJrBc73afBbUbdxluTP0FhLq_n5tMNvRFfri_NWeZf7viqW_67wC_PGr8P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771229529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers</title><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Elwood, J H ; Elwood, P C ; Campbell, M J ; Stanford, C F ; Chivers, A ; Hey, I ; Brewster, L ; Sweetnam, P M</creator><creatorcontrib>Elwood, J H ; Elwood, P C ; Campbell, M J ; Stanford, C F ; Chivers, A ; Hey, I ; Brewster, L ; Sweetnam, P M</creatorcontrib><description>Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which flax processing had been a major source of employment. The MRC questionnaire on respiratory symptoms was administered and Vitalograph tracings recorded on subjects aged 40 to 74 inclusive. An occupational history was taken at the end of each interview. Lung function in ex-flax workers was slightly lower than in control subjects never exposed to flax dust, but the presence of a positive interaction with age meant that differences were apparent only in the younger subjects. Over about the age of 65 the lung function in the ex-flax workers was comparable with that of the controls and overall the loss was at most about half that due to light smoking (1-14 cigarettes a day). The association between a "dust exposure score" and lung function was inconsistent in the two sexes. In men there was a small decrement with increasing dust exposure. In women there was also a small decrement, but a positive interaction with age meant that the women with the highest dust exposure scores had a lower loss with increasing age than the women with the least dust exposure. There was an excess in symptoms in the ex-flax workers but the size of the excess was greater than would be expected from the lung function results. It is possible that, although the survey was conducted without explicit reference to the flax industry, knowledge throughout Northern Ireland that many flax workers have been awarded compensation on the grounds of respiratory disablement may have led to an increased reporting of symptoms in the ex-flax workers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1072</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/oem.43.5.300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3707867</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJIMAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchitis - etiology ; Byssinosis ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; Chronic bronchitis ; Chronic Disease ; Cigarette smoking ; Disabilities ; Female ; Forced Expiratory Volume ; Humans ; Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.) ; Linum usitatissimum ; Lungs ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Men ; Middle Aged ; Northern Ireland ; Occupational Diseases - etiology ; Respiratory symptoms ; Respiratory Tract Diseases - etiology ; Textile Industry ; Time Factors ; Toxicology ; Vital Capacity ; Working women</subject><ispartof>British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986-05, Vol.43 (5), p.300-306</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 British Journal of Industrial Medicine</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD May 1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/43/5/300.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/43/5/300.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,723,776,780,881,3183,23550,27901,27902,53766,53768,58213,58446,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8775817$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3707867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elwood, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elwood, P C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, C F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hey, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewster, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweetnam, P M</creatorcontrib><title>Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers</title><title>British Journal of Industrial Medicine</title><addtitle>Br J Ind Med</addtitle><description>Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which flax processing had been a major source of employment. The MRC questionnaire on respiratory symptoms was administered and Vitalograph tracings recorded on subjects aged 40 to 74 inclusive. An occupational history was taken at the end of each interview. Lung function in ex-flax workers was slightly lower than in control subjects never exposed to flax dust, but the presence of a positive interaction with age meant that differences were apparent only in the younger subjects. Over about the age of 65 the lung function in the ex-flax workers was comparable with that of the controls and overall the loss was at most about half that due to light smoking (1-14 cigarettes a day). The association between a "dust exposure score" and lung function was inconsistent in the two sexes. In men there was a small decrement with increasing dust exposure. In women there was also a small decrement, but a positive interaction with age meant that the women with the highest dust exposure scores had a lower loss with increasing age than the women with the least dust exposure. There was an excess in symptoms in the ex-flax workers but the size of the excess was greater than would be expected from the lung function results. It is possible that, although the survey was conducted without explicit reference to the flax industry, knowledge throughout Northern Ireland that many flax workers have been awarded compensation on the grounds of respiratory disablement may have led to an increased reporting of symptoms in the ex-flax workers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchitis - etiology</subject><subject>Byssinosis</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>Chronic bronchitis</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forced Expiratory Volume</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)</subject><subject>Linum usitatissimum</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Northern Ireland</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Respiratory symptoms</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Textile Industry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Vital Capacity</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>0007-1072</issn><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFrFDEYxYNY6rZ68yosKBWhsyZfJvmSiyCL2kKpKKVILyEzk9VsZyZrMqu7_70pu4zWg55yeD9e3vseIU8ZnTHG5evgulnJZ2LGKX1AJqxEWqAG-ZBMKKVYMIrwiByltKSUceRwSA45UlQSJ-TVZ5dWPtohxO208clWvvXDdur7qdsUi9Zupj9DvHUxPSYHC9sm92T_HpOr9--u5mfFxccP5_O3F0UlNB2KWlEALhrXsKpxrNQSBAAIXauyqpRsKHWIdaW5K2VZ5pxKK-nAcdVUTPNj8mZnu1pXnWtq1w_RtmYVfWfj1gTrzX2l99_M1_DDsNxVCp4NTvYGMXxfuzSYzqfata3tXVgnA1pxoRj8F8zZQaHEDD7_C1yGdezzEQxDZABawF3w0x1Vx5BSdIsxM6PmbiiThzIlN8LkoTL-7M-eI7xfJusv9rpNtW0X0fa1TyOmEHMJ_G2zTHnCUQZEkEzJrBc73afBbUbdxluTP0FhLq_n5tMNvRFfri_NWeZf7viqW_67wC_PGr8P</recordid><startdate>19860501</startdate><enddate>19860501</enddate><creator>Elwood, J H</creator><creator>Elwood, P C</creator><creator>Campbell, M J</creator><creator>Stanford, C F</creator><creator>Chivers, A</creator><creator>Hey, I</creator><creator>Brewster, L</creator><creator>Sweetnam, P M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860501</creationdate><title>Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers</title><author>Elwood, J H ; Elwood, P C ; Campbell, M J ; Stanford, C F ; Chivers, A ; Hey, I ; Brewster, L ; Sweetnam, P M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchitis - etiology</topic><topic>Byssinosis</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>Chronic bronchitis</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forced Expiratory Volume</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)</topic><topic>Linum usitatissimum</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Northern Ireland</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Respiratory symptoms</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Textile Industry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Vital Capacity</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elwood, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elwood, P C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, C F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hey, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewster, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweetnam, P M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British Journal of Industrial Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elwood, J H</au><au>Elwood, P C</au><au>Campbell, M J</au><au>Stanford, C F</au><au>Chivers, A</au><au>Hey, I</au><au>Brewster, L</au><au>Sweetnam, P M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers</atitle><jtitle>British Journal of Industrial Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ind Med</addtitle><date>1986-05-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>300-306</pages><issn>0007-1072</issn><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><coden>BJIMAG</coden><abstract>Acute respiratory effects occur in a high proportion of subjects exposed to textile dusts. The extent to which these lead to permanent respiratory symptoms and loss of lung function is unknown. A survey of random population samples was therefore conducted in ten towns in Northern Ireland in which flax processing had been a major source of employment. The MRC questionnaire on respiratory symptoms was administered and Vitalograph tracings recorded on subjects aged 40 to 74 inclusive. An occupational history was taken at the end of each interview. Lung function in ex-flax workers was slightly lower than in control subjects never exposed to flax dust, but the presence of a positive interaction with age meant that differences were apparent only in the younger subjects. Over about the age of 65 the lung function in the ex-flax workers was comparable with that of the controls and overall the loss was at most about half that due to light smoking (1-14 cigarettes a day). The association between a "dust exposure score" and lung function was inconsistent in the two sexes. In men there was a small decrement with increasing dust exposure. In women there was also a small decrement, but a positive interaction with age meant that the women with the highest dust exposure scores had a lower loss with increasing age than the women with the least dust exposure. There was an excess in symptoms in the ex-flax workers but the size of the excess was greater than would be expected from the lung function results. It is possible that, although the survey was conducted without explicit reference to the flax industry, knowledge throughout Northern Ireland that many flax workers have been awarded compensation on the grounds of respiratory disablement may have led to an increased reporting of symptoms in the ex-flax workers.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>3707867</pmid><doi>10.1136/oem.43.5.300</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1072
ispartof British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1986-05, Vol.43 (5), p.300-306
issn 0007-1072
1351-0711
1470-7926
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1007653
source PubMed Central (PMC); BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Bronchitis - etiology
Byssinosis
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
Chronic bronchitis
Chronic Disease
Cigarette smoking
Disabilities
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Inorganic dusts (pneumoconiosises) and organic dusts (byssinosis etc.)
Linum usitatissimum
Lungs
Male
Medical sciences
Men
Middle Aged
Northern Ireland
Occupational Diseases - etiology
Respiratory symptoms
Respiratory Tract Diseases - etiology
Textile Industry
Time Factors
Toxicology
Vital Capacity
Working women
title Respiratory disability in ex-flax workers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T12%3A46%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Respiratory%20disability%20in%20ex-flax%20workers&rft.jtitle=British%20Journal%20of%20Industrial%20Medicine&rft.au=Elwood,%20J%20H&rft.date=1986-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=300-306&rft.issn=0007-1072&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft.coden=BJIMAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/oem.43.5.300&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E27726186%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b590t-c802235ded1bde14962522259c84bb86d00e77cb93e46449268986e2e38db193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771229529&rft_id=info:pmid/3707867&rft_jstor_id=27726186&rfr_iscdi=true