Malaria Paradoxes of the U.S. Civil War

The U.S. Civil War (1861-1865) pre-dated modern understanding of malaria. Yet, malarial diseases (remittent fever, intermittent fever, typho-malarial fever) were frequently reported as causes of morbidity and mortality in soldiers. Modern readers find Civil War-era descriptions of malaria contradict...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene 2023-04, Vol.108 (4), p.646-649
Main Author: Shanks, G Dennis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
American Civil War
Humans
Malaria
Military Personnel
Morbidity
Prisoners
Quinine
Review
United States
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The U.S. Civil War (1861-1865) pre-dated modern understanding of malaria. Yet, malarial diseases (remittent fever, intermittent fever, typho-malarial fever) were frequently reported as causes of morbidity and mortality in soldiers. Modern readers find Civil War-era descriptions of malaria contradictory or paradoxical. For example, although the concept of race-specific immunity to tropical diseases was widely accepted, malaria mortality rates were reportedly more than three times higher among Black than White Union soldiers (16/1,000/year versus 5/1,000/year). Also, malaria rates were reportedly lower among prisoners of war at the infamous Andersonville, GA, prison camp than among Confederate soldiers in the same area. Literally tons of quinine were given prophylactically to Union soldiers deployed in the southern United States, but blackwater fever was not reported by medical officers. All three paradoxes have reasonable modern explanations that give credence to the astute clinical observations of our scientific predecessors during the U.S. Civil War.
ISSN:0002-9637
1476-1645
DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.22-0672