Loading…
Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction
Introduction Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery 2023-03, Vol.22 (Suppl 1), p.98-104 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783 |
container_end_page | 104 |
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | 98 |
container_title | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Frohwitter, G. Lutz, R. Baran, C. Weber, M. Nobis, C. P. Rau, A. Kesting, M. |
description | Introduction
Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction.
Material & Methods
A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Results
A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap.
Discussion
The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases.
Conclusion
The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12663-021-01635-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10082879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2800149231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1vFCEUJcbGNtv-AR8MiS--oHBhhuHJNJtWTdrYaDW-EZaBKQ07rDDjx7-X3a1V-yAvcHMP555zD0JPGX3JKJWvCoO25YQCI5S1vCHqETqiSgqiBHx5vHsD6UCqQ3RSyi2thzOuOHuCDrmkgqlGHqF-mcYSyuTGCX82cXY4eXz9PZGPkxkcvnJ9sNHh82g2BYcRTzcOnw471GWwOZU5D8GaiC_NjxBj8saGWn1wtvJOebZTSOMxOvAmFndydy_Qp_Oz6-VbcvH-zbvl6QWxQjYTEW0PsgEFYtU7L5gFpqhsect901PadQyUAwNCdN5AYwSAt9L6FVfUednxBXq9593Mq7XrbTWVTdSbHNYm_9TJBP1vZww3ekjfdN1oB51UleHFHUNOX2dXJr0OxboYzejSXDR0lDKhoG5ygZ4_gN6mOY_VnwbFlOScwlYS7FHbXZXs_L0aRrdjpd4HqWuQehek3qp49reP-y-_Y6sAvgeU2hoHl__M_g_tL9QIqL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919733028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Frohwitter, G. ; Lutz, R. ; Baran, C. ; Weber, M. ; Nobis, C. P. ; Rau, A. ; Kesting, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Frohwitter, G. ; Lutz, R. ; Baran, C. ; Weber, M. ; Nobis, C. P. ; Rau, A. ; Kesting, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction.
Material & Methods
A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Results
A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap.
Discussion
The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases.
Conclusion
The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-8279</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-942X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12663-021-01635-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37041957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Dentistry ; Dissection ; Fistula ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Microsurgery ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original ; Original Article ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Patients ; Plastic Surgery ; Reconstructive surgery ; Skin</subject><ispartof>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023-03, Vol.22 (Suppl 1), p.98-104</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6732-215X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082879/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082879/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frohwitter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baran, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobis, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesting, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction</title><title>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</title><addtitle>J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Maxillofac Oral Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction.
Material & Methods
A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Results
A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap.
Discussion
The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases.
Conclusion
The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Skin</subject><issn>0972-8279</issn><issn>0974-942X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UV1vFCEUJcbGNtv-AR8MiS--oHBhhuHJNJtWTdrYaDW-EZaBKQ07rDDjx7-X3a1V-yAvcHMP555zD0JPGX3JKJWvCoO25YQCI5S1vCHqETqiSgqiBHx5vHsD6UCqQ3RSyi2thzOuOHuCDrmkgqlGHqF-mcYSyuTGCX82cXY4eXz9PZGPkxkcvnJ9sNHh82g2BYcRTzcOnw471GWwOZU5D8GaiC_NjxBj8saGWn1wtvJOebZTSOMxOvAmFndydy_Qp_Oz6-VbcvH-zbvl6QWxQjYTEW0PsgEFYtU7L5gFpqhsect901PadQyUAwNCdN5AYwSAt9L6FVfUednxBXq9593Mq7XrbTWVTdSbHNYm_9TJBP1vZww3ekjfdN1oB51UleHFHUNOX2dXJr0OxboYzejSXDR0lDKhoG5ygZ4_gN6mOY_VnwbFlOScwlYS7FHbXZXs_L0aRrdjpd4HqWuQehek3qp49reP-y-_Y6sAvgeU2hoHl__M_g_tL9QIqL4</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Frohwitter, G.</creator><creator>Lutz, R.</creator><creator>Baran, C.</creator><creator>Weber, M.</creator><creator>Nobis, C. P.</creator><creator>Rau, A.</creator><creator>Kesting, M.</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-215X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction</title><author>Frohwitter, G. ; Lutz, R. ; Baran, C. ; Weber, M. ; Nobis, C. P. ; Rau, A. ; Kesting, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Skin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frohwitter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baran, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobis, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesting, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frohwitter, G.</au><au>Lutz, R.</au><au>Baran, C.</au><au>Weber, M.</au><au>Nobis, C. P.</au><au>Rau, A.</au><au>Kesting, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</jtitle><stitle>J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Maxillofac Oral Surg</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>98-104</pages><issn>0972-8279</issn><eissn>0974-942X</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction.
Material & Methods
A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Results
A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap.
Discussion
The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases.
Conclusion
The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>37041957</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12663-021-01635-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-215X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0972-8279 |
ispartof | Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023-03, Vol.22 (Suppl 1), p.98-104 |
issn | 0972-8279 0974-942X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10082879 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Springer Link |
subjects | Anesthesia Dentistry Dissection Fistula Medical records Medicine Medicine & Public Health Microsurgery Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Original Original Article Otorhinolaryngology Patients Plastic Surgery Reconstructive surgery Skin |
title | Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A49%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consistent%20Value%20of%20Two-Stage%20Pedicle%20Flaps%20in%20the%20Age%20of%20Microsurgical%20Maxillofacial%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20maxillofacial%20and%20oral%20surgery&rft.au=Frohwitter,%20G.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=98-104&rft.issn=0972-8279&rft.eissn=0974-942X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12663-021-01635-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2800149231%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919733028&rft_id=info:pmid/37041957&rfr_iscdi=true |