Loading…

Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction

Introduction Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery 2023-03, Vol.22 (Suppl 1), p.98-104
Main Authors: Frohwitter, G., Lutz, R., Baran, C., Weber, M., Nobis, C. P., Rau, A., Kesting, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783
container_end_page 104
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page 98
container_title Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery
container_volume 22
creator Frohwitter, G.
Lutz, R.
Baran, C.
Weber, M.
Nobis, C. P.
Rau, A.
Kesting, M.
description Introduction Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction. Material & Methods A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Results A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap. Discussion The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases. Conclusion The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12663-021-01635-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10082879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2800149231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UV1vFCEUJcbGNtv-AR8MiS--oHBhhuHJNJtWTdrYaDW-EZaBKQ07rDDjx7-X3a1V-yAvcHMP555zD0JPGX3JKJWvCoO25YQCI5S1vCHqETqiSgqiBHx5vHsD6UCqQ3RSyi2thzOuOHuCDrmkgqlGHqF-mcYSyuTGCX82cXY4eXz9PZGPkxkcvnJ9sNHh82g2BYcRTzcOnw471GWwOZU5D8GaiC_NjxBj8saGWn1wtvJOebZTSOMxOvAmFndydy_Qp_Oz6-VbcvH-zbvl6QWxQjYTEW0PsgEFYtU7L5gFpqhsect901PadQyUAwNCdN5AYwSAt9L6FVfUednxBXq9593Mq7XrbTWVTdSbHNYm_9TJBP1vZww3ekjfdN1oB51UleHFHUNOX2dXJr0OxboYzejSXDR0lDKhoG5ygZ4_gN6mOY_VnwbFlOScwlYS7FHbXZXs_L0aRrdjpd4HqWuQehek3qp49reP-y-_Y6sAvgeU2hoHl__M_g_tL9QIqL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919733028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Frohwitter, G. ; Lutz, R. ; Baran, C. ; Weber, M. ; Nobis, C. P. ; Rau, A. ; Kesting, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Frohwitter, G. ; Lutz, R. ; Baran, C. ; Weber, M. ; Nobis, C. P. ; Rau, A. ; Kesting, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction. Material &amp; Methods A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Results A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap. Discussion The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases. Conclusion The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-8279</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-942X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12663-021-01635-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37041957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Dentistry ; Dissection ; Fistula ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Microsurgery ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original ; Original Article ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Patients ; Plastic Surgery ; Reconstructive surgery ; Skin</subject><ispartof>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023-03, Vol.22 (Suppl 1), p.98-104</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6732-215X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082879/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082879/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frohwitter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baran, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobis, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesting, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction</title><title>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</title><addtitle>J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Maxillofac Oral Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction. Material &amp; Methods A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Results A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap. Discussion The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases. Conclusion The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Skin</subject><issn>0972-8279</issn><issn>0974-942X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UV1vFCEUJcbGNtv-AR8MiS--oHBhhuHJNJtWTdrYaDW-EZaBKQ07rDDjx7-X3a1V-yAvcHMP555zD0JPGX3JKJWvCoO25YQCI5S1vCHqETqiSgqiBHx5vHsD6UCqQ3RSyi2thzOuOHuCDrmkgqlGHqF-mcYSyuTGCX82cXY4eXz9PZGPkxkcvnJ9sNHh82g2BYcRTzcOnw471GWwOZU5D8GaiC_NjxBj8saGWn1wtvJOebZTSOMxOvAmFndydy_Qp_Oz6-VbcvH-zbvl6QWxQjYTEW0PsgEFYtU7L5gFpqhsect901PadQyUAwNCdN5AYwSAt9L6FVfUednxBXq9593Mq7XrbTWVTdSbHNYm_9TJBP1vZww3ekjfdN1oB51UleHFHUNOX2dXJr0OxboYzejSXDR0lDKhoG5ygZ4_gN6mOY_VnwbFlOScwlYS7FHbXZXs_L0aRrdjpd4HqWuQehek3qp49reP-y-_Y6sAvgeU2hoHl__M_g_tL9QIqL4</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Frohwitter, G.</creator><creator>Lutz, R.</creator><creator>Baran, C.</creator><creator>Weber, M.</creator><creator>Nobis, C. P.</creator><creator>Rau, A.</creator><creator>Kesting, M.</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-215X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction</title><author>Frohwitter, G. ; Lutz, R. ; Baran, C. ; Weber, M. ; Nobis, C. P. ; Rau, A. ; Kesting, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Skin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frohwitter, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baran, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nobis, C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesting, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frohwitter, G.</au><au>Lutz, R.</au><au>Baran, C.</au><au>Weber, M.</au><au>Nobis, C. P.</au><au>Rau, A.</au><au>Kesting, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery</jtitle><stitle>J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Maxillofac Oral Surg</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>98-104</pages><issn>0972-8279</issn><eissn>0974-942X</eissn><abstract>Introduction Up to the second half of the twentieth century, pedicled flaps marked the gold standard in reconstructive surgery. Followed by the introduction of microsurgical techniques, these flaps were increasingly abandoned. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the value of two-stage pedicle flaps in modern maxillofacial reconstruction. Material &amp; Methods A chart review from October 2017 to November 2020 was performed to identify patients who were treated by a two-stage pedicle flap in our Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Results A total of 31 patients, 17 female and 14 males received 36 two-stage pedicle flaps. All patients were in noticeably impaired health condition with a majority of ASA-score 3. The defect location mainly contained extraoral resections (58.3%). A variety of flaps were harvested consisting of buccal flaps, Abbe flaps, forehead flaps, deltopectoral flaps, nasolabial flaps, and a tubed flap. Discussion The study outlines two indications for the use of two-stage pedicle flaps. Firstly, as a back-up strategy in heavily pre-treated wound beds and secondly in an almost contrarily indication as a first-choice reconstructive option of the facial skin in esthetic demanding cases. Conclusion The timesaving and straight forward surgical approach as well as their low postsurgical complications and strong long-time success rates secure the two-stage pedicle flap a justified niche role in times of microsurgical maxillofacial reconstruction.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>37041957</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12663-021-01635-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-215X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-8279
ispartof Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2023-03, Vol.22 (Suppl 1), p.98-104
issn 0972-8279
0974-942X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10082879
source PubMed (Medline); Springer Link
subjects Anesthesia
Dentistry
Dissection
Fistula
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Microsurgery
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Original
Original Article
Otorhinolaryngology
Patients
Plastic Surgery
Reconstructive surgery
Skin
title Consistent Value of Two-Stage Pedicle Flaps in the Age of Microsurgical Maxillofacial Reconstruction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A49%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consistent%20Value%20of%20Two-Stage%20Pedicle%20Flaps%20in%20the%20Age%20of%20Microsurgical%20Maxillofacial%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20maxillofacial%20and%20oral%20surgery&rft.au=Frohwitter,%20G.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=98-104&rft.issn=0972-8279&rft.eissn=0974-942X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12663-021-01635-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2800149231%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-46d2752924bdef41c219076363f5d0088129e2a2448fa25a422fc7cfb390ef783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919733028&rft_id=info:pmid/37041957&rfr_iscdi=true