Loading…

Change in pharmacodynamic variables following once‐weekly tirzepatide treatment versus dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS J‐mono substudy)

Aim To evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of tirzepatide, a novel dual glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist, compared with dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods SURPASS J‐mono was a 52‐week, multicentre, ra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2023-02, Vol.25 (2), p.398-406
Main Authors: Yabe, Daisuke, Kawamori, Dan, Seino, Yusuke, Oura, Tomonori, Takeuchi, Masakazu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim To evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of tirzepatide, a novel dual glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist, compared with dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods SURPASS J‐mono was a 52‐week, multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, parallel, active‐controlled, Phase 3 study, conducted in Japan. This substudy of SURPASS J‐mono evaluated postprandial metabolic variables and appetite after a meal tolerance test, and body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Results Of 636 participants in SURPASS J‐mono, 48 were included in this substudy and assigned to tirzepatide 5 mg (n = 9), tirzepatide 10 mg (n = 11), tirzepatide 15 mg (n = 9), or dulaglutide 0.75 mg (n = 19). Participants had a mean (standard deviation) age of 58.6 (7.5) years, duration of diabetes of 6.0 (6.3) years, and body mass index of 27.5 (3.5) kg/m2. Mean glycated haemoglobin at baseline was 66 mmol/mol (8.22%). Following a standardized meal test, statistically significant differences in change from baseline in area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to 6 h after dose for glucose, insulin, glucagon, C‐peptide and triglycerides were observed in all tirzepatide treatment arms, except triglycerides at 10 mg, compared with dulaglutide at Week 32. For body composition, tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg resulted in a significant reduction in body weight, and all doses of tirzepatide resulted in a significant reduction in body fat mass at Week 52. Conclusions Compared with dulaglutide, tirzepatide showed greater potential for normalizing metabolic factors after a standardized meal. Tirzepatide reduced body weight and body fat mass.
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.14882