Loading…

Perceived stress and semen quality

Background Psychological stress is prevalent among reproductive‐aged men. Assessment of semen quality for epidemiological studies is challenging as data collection is expensive and cumbersome, and studies evaluating the effect of perceived stress on semen quality are inconsistent. Objective To exami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Andrology (Oxford) 2023-01, Vol.11 (1), p.45-53
Main Authors: Lund, Katrine H., Laursen, Anne Sofie D., Grønborg, Therese K., Toft, Gunnar, Jacobsen, Bjarke H., Wang, Tanran R., Wesselink, Amelia K., Hatch, Elizabeth E., Sommer, Greg J., Eisenberg, Michael L., Rothman, Kenneth J., Sørensen, Henrik T., Wise, Lauren A., Mikkelsen, Ellen M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Psychological stress is prevalent among reproductive‐aged men. Assessment of semen quality for epidemiological studies is challenging as data collection is expensive and cumbersome, and studies evaluating the effect of perceived stress on semen quality are inconsistent. Objective To examine the association between perceived stress and semen quality. Material and methods We analyzed baseline data on 644 men (1,159 semen samples) from two prospective preconception cohort studies during 2015–2021: 592 in Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) and 52 in SnartForaeldre.dk (SF). At study entry, men aged ≥21 years (PRESTO) and ≥18 years (SF) trying to conceive without fertility treatment completed a questionnaire on reproductive and medical history, socio‐demographics, lifestyle, and the 10‐item version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; interquartile range [IQR] of scores: 0–40). After enrollment (median weeks: 2.1, IQR: 1.3–3.7), men were invited to perform in‐home semen testing, twice with 7–10 days between tests, using the Trak Male Fertility Testing System. Semen quality was characterized by semen volume, sperm concentration, and total sperm count. We fit generalized estimating equation linear regression models to estimate the percent difference in mean log‐transformed semen parameters by four PSS groups (
ISSN:2047-2919
2047-2927
DOI:10.1111/andr.13301