Distinct Predictors of Clinical Response after Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation between Bipolar and Unipolar Disorders

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health 2023-03, Vol.20 (7), p.5276
• Main Authors: Lacroix, Aurélie, Paquet, Aude, Okassa, Mireille, Vinais, Théodore, Lannaud, Marilyne, Plansont, Brigitte, Buisson, Alexandre, Guignandon, Sandrine, Malauzat, Dominique, Girard, Murielle, Calvet, Benjamin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anxiety Disorders; Bipolar disorder; Bipolar Disorder - therapy; Care and treatment; Comparative analysis; Diagnosis; Drug resistance; Humans; Life Sciences; Magnetic fields; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Mental depression; Neuromodulation; Patients; Prefrontal Cortex; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Regression analysis; Santé publique et épidémiologie; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075276

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to be therapeutically effective for patients suffering from drug-resistant depression. The distinction between bipolar and unipolar disorders would be of great interests to better adapt their respective treatments. We aimed to identify the factors predicting clinical improvement at one month (M1) after the start of rTMS treatment for each diagnosis, which was preceded by a comparison of the patients' clinical conditions. We used the data collected and the method employed in a previous publication on 291 patients. Although the bipolar group had fewer responders, these patients seemed to better maintain their post-rTMS improvement on anxiety and perception of the severity of their illness than those in the unipolar group. For the bipolar group, young age coupled with low number of medications and high fatigue was shown to be the best combination for predicting improvement at M1. The duration of current depressive episode, which was previously demonstrated for whole group, combined with being attached was shown to favor clinical improvement among the patients in unipolar group. We were able to define a combination of specific factors related to each diagnosis for predicting the patients' clinical response. This could be extremely useful to predict the efficacy of rTMS during routine clinical practice in neuromodulation services.