Loading…

Inhalation phage therapy as a new approach to preventing secondary bacterial pneumonia in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: A double-blind clinical trial study

Inhalation phage therapy is proposed as a replacement approach for antibiotics in the treatment of pulmonary bacterial infections. This study investigates phage therapy on bacterial pneumonia in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 via the inhalation route. In this double-blind clinical trial,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of drug delivery science and technology 2023-06, Vol.84, p.104486-104486, Article 104486
Main Authors: Samaee, Hamid Reza, Eslami, Gohar, Rahimzadeh, Golnar, Saeedi, Majid, Davoudi Badabi, Alireza, Asare-Addo, Kofi, Nokhodchi, Ali, Roozbeh, Fatemeh, Moosazadeh, Mahmood, Ghasemian, Roya, Alikhani, Ahmad, Rezai, Mohammad Sadegh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Inhalation phage therapy is proposed as a replacement approach for antibiotics in the treatment of pulmonary bacterial infections. This study investigates phage therapy on bacterial pneumonia in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 via the inhalation route. In this double-blind clinical trial, 60 patients with positive COVID-19 hospitalized in three central Mazandaran hospitals were chosen and randomly divided into two intervention and control groups. Standard country protocol drugs plus 10 mL of phage suspension every 12 h with a mesh nebulizer was prescribed for 7 days in the intervention group. The two groups were compared in terms of O2Sat, survival rate, severe secondary pulmonary bacterial infection and duration of hospitalization. Comparing the results between the intervention and control group, in terms of the trend of O2Sat change, negative sputum culture, no fever, no dyspnea, duration of hospitalization, duration of intubation and under ventilation, showed that the difference between these two groups was statistically different (P value 
ISSN:1773-2247
2588-8943
DOI:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104486