Characterizing Diabetes Empowerment and Motivation for Changing Health Behaviors Among People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Survey

• Published in: Diabetes therapy 2023-05, Vol.14 (5), p.869-882
• Main Authors: Clark, Callahan N., Eby, Elizabeth L., Lensing, Cody J., Fultz, Elena, Hart, Brian, Lingcaro, Lilian, Hoffner, Ron, Schloot, Nanette C., Benneyworth, Brian D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behavior modification; Cardiology; Care and treatment; Diabetes; Empowerment; Endocrinology; Internal Medicine; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Motivation (Psychology); Original Research; Polls & surveys; Surveys; Type 2 diabetes
• ISSN: 1869-6953; 1869-6961
• DOI: 10.1007/s13300-023-01397-2

Introduction Effectively engaging people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) earlier in their health journeys is critical to prevent downstream complications. Digitally based diabetes programs are a growing component of care delivery that have the potential to engage individuals outside of traditional clinic-based settings and use personalized data to pair people to tailored diabetes self-management interventions. Knowing an individuals’ diabetes empowerment and health-related motivation can help drive appropriate recommendations for personalized interventions. We aimed to characterize diabetes empowerment and motivation towards changing health behaviors among participants in Level2, a T2D specialty care organization in the USA that combines wearable technology with personalized clinical support. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among people enrolled in Level2 (February–March 2021). Distributions of respondent-reported diabetes empowerment and health motivation were analyzed using Motivation and Attitudes Toward Changing Health (MATCH) and Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form (DES-SF) scales, respectively. Associations between MATCH and DES-SF scores with Level2 engagement measures and glycemic control were analyzed. Results The final analysis included 1258 respondents with T2D (mean age 55.7 ± 8.4 years). Respondents had high average MATCH (4.19/5) and DES-SF (4.02/5) scores. The average MATCH subscores for willingness (4.43/5) and worthwhileness (4.39/5) were higher than the average ability subscore (3.73/5). Both MATCH and DES-SF scores showed very weak correlations with Level2 engagement measures and glycemic control ( ρ  = − 0.18–0.19). Conclusions Level2 survey respondents had high average motivation and diabetes empowerment scores. Further research is needed to validate sensitivity of these scales to detect changes in motivation and empowerment over time and to determine whether differences in scores can be used to pair people to personalized interventions.