Loading…

Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major cause of lower limb amputations. Many treatment recommendations have been proposed. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate when combined with mupirocin ointment, in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer in comparison to topica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37570
Main Authors: Chatterjee, Neha, Ekka, Nishith M, Mahajan, Mayank, Kumar, Binay, Kumar, Nabu, Zia, Arquam, Devarajan, Aravind, Kujur, Archana D, Sinha, Dipendra K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b0bda79b85c655a33ddfa3cc3cb9aefd9a3fcd7edfe17725dc4b98615b4353dc3
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page e37570
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 15
creator Chatterjee, Neha
Ekka, Nishith M
Mahajan, Mayank
Kumar, Binay
Kumar, Nabu
Zia, Arquam
Devarajan, Aravind
Kujur, Archana D
Sinha, Dipendra K
description Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major cause of lower limb amputations. Many treatment recommendations have been proposed. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate when combined with mupirocin ointment, in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer in comparison to topical mupirocin alone, in terms of healing rates. This open-labeled randomized study was conducted on 108 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate and mupirocin combination, compared to topical mupirocin alone. The patients were administered the same parenteral antibiotic, and wounds were subjected to daily dressing. The healing rates (determined by the percentage reduction in wound area) in the two groups were calculated. The mean healing rates in both groups were expressed in percentage and compared using the Student's t-test. A total of 108 patients were included in the study. Male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The incidence of diabetic foot was the highest (50.9%) in the age group of 50-59 years. The mean age of the study population was 51 years. The incidence of diabetic foot ulcers was highest in the months of July-August (42%). A total of 71.2% patients had random blood sugar levels between 150-200 mg/dL, and 72.2% patients had diabetes for five to 10 years. The mean±standard deviation (SD) of the healing rates in the sucralfate and mupirocin combination group and the control group were 16.2±7.3% and 14.5±6.6%, respectively. Comparison of the means by Student's t-test failed to show a statistical difference in healing rates between the two groups (p=0.201). We concluded that the addition of topical sucralfate does not show any obvious benefits in terms of healing rates in diabetic foot ulcers as compared to mupirocin alone.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.37570
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10184874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2821269139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b0bda79b85c655a33ddfa3cc3cb9aefd9a3fcd7edfe17725dc4b98615b4353dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFrFTEUhYMottTuXEvAjQunJpOXyYwbKbVV4UnBtuuQublpU2aSZ5Ip1F9vnq-W6uoeuB-He-4h5DVnR0rJ4QMsCZd8JJRU7BnZb3nXNz3vV8-f6D1ymPMtY4wz1TLFXpI9ofiguOj2STx1DqH4OwyYM42OXsaNBzPRiwWSmZwpSH2g5QbpdxPMNc4Yypb77M2IxQM9i7HQqwkw5Y_0ONDzDYZmXZcTWvrDBBtn_6vKi7LY-1fkhTNTxsOHeUCuzk4vT7426_Mv306O1w0IxkozstEaNYy9hE5KI4S1zggAAeNg0NnBCAdWoXXIlWqlhdU49B2X40pIYUEckE87380yzmihHl3T6E3ys0n3Ohqv_90Ef6Ov453mrL6sV6vq8O7BIcWfC-aiZ58Bp8kEjEvWbc9lK1nLhoq-_Q-9jUsKNV-lWt52Axdb6v2OghRzTuger-FMb9vUuzb1nzYr_uZpgkf4b3fiN2YSniY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821269139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chatterjee, Neha ; Ekka, Nishith M ; Mahajan, Mayank ; Kumar, Binay ; Kumar, Nabu ; Zia, Arquam ; Devarajan, Aravind ; Kujur, Archana D ; Sinha, Dipendra K</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Neha ; Ekka, Nishith M ; Mahajan, Mayank ; Kumar, Binay ; Kumar, Nabu ; Zia, Arquam ; Devarajan, Aravind ; Kujur, Archana D ; Sinha, Dipendra K</creatorcontrib><description>Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major cause of lower limb amputations. Many treatment recommendations have been proposed. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate when combined with mupirocin ointment, in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer in comparison to topical mupirocin alone, in terms of healing rates. This open-labeled randomized study was conducted on 108 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate and mupirocin combination, compared to topical mupirocin alone. The patients were administered the same parenteral antibiotic, and wounds were subjected to daily dressing. The healing rates (determined by the percentage reduction in wound area) in the two groups were calculated. The mean healing rates in both groups were expressed in percentage and compared using the Student's t-test. A total of 108 patients were included in the study. Male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The incidence of diabetic foot was the highest (50.9%) in the age group of 50-59 years. The mean age of the study population was 51 years. The incidence of diabetic foot ulcers was highest in the months of July-August (42%). A total of 71.2% patients had random blood sugar levels between 150-200 mg/dL, and 72.2% patients had diabetes for five to 10 years. The mean±standard deviation (SD) of the healing rates in the sucralfate and mupirocin combination group and the control group were 16.2±7.3% and 14.5±6.6%, respectively. Comparison of the means by Student's t-test failed to show a statistical difference in healing rates between the two groups (p=0.201). We concluded that the addition of topical sucralfate does not show any obvious benefits in terms of healing rates in diabetic foot ulcers as compared to mupirocin alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37570</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37197136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Age groups ; Cytokines ; Debridement ; Diabetes ; Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism ; Epidemiology/Public Health ; Foot diseases ; General Surgery ; Leg ulcers ; Patients ; Peripheral neuropathy ; Population ; Regression analysis ; Student's t-test ; Variance analysis ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37570</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Chatterjee et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Chatterjee et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Chatterjee et al. 2023 Chatterjee et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b0bda79b85c655a33ddfa3cc3cb9aefd9a3fcd7edfe17725dc4b98615b4353dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2821269139/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2821269139?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekka, Nishith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Mayank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Binay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Nabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zia, Arquam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devarajan, Aravind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujur, Archana D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Dipendra K</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major cause of lower limb amputations. Many treatment recommendations have been proposed. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate when combined with mupirocin ointment, in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer in comparison to topical mupirocin alone, in terms of healing rates. This open-labeled randomized study was conducted on 108 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate and mupirocin combination, compared to topical mupirocin alone. The patients were administered the same parenteral antibiotic, and wounds were subjected to daily dressing. The healing rates (determined by the percentage reduction in wound area) in the two groups were calculated. The mean healing rates in both groups were expressed in percentage and compared using the Student's t-test. A total of 108 patients were included in the study. Male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The incidence of diabetic foot was the highest (50.9%) in the age group of 50-59 years. The mean age of the study population was 51 years. The incidence of diabetic foot ulcers was highest in the months of July-August (42%). A total of 71.2% patients had random blood sugar levels between 150-200 mg/dL, and 72.2% patients had diabetes for five to 10 years. The mean±standard deviation (SD) of the healing rates in the sucralfate and mupirocin combination group and the control group were 16.2±7.3% and 14.5±6.6%, respectively. Comparison of the means by Student's t-test failed to show a statistical difference in healing rates between the two groups (p=0.201). We concluded that the addition of topical sucralfate does not show any obvious benefits in terms of healing rates in diabetic foot ulcers as compared to mupirocin alone.</description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Cytokines</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism</subject><subject>Epidemiology/Public Health</subject><subject>Foot diseases</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Leg ulcers</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peripheral neuropathy</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Student's t-test</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFrFTEUhYMottTuXEvAjQunJpOXyYwbKbVV4UnBtuuQublpU2aSZ5Ip1F9vnq-W6uoeuB-He-4h5DVnR0rJ4QMsCZd8JJRU7BnZb3nXNz3vV8-f6D1ymPMtY4wz1TLFXpI9ofiguOj2STx1DqH4OwyYM42OXsaNBzPRiwWSmZwpSH2g5QbpdxPMNc4Yypb77M2IxQM9i7HQqwkw5Y_0ONDzDYZmXZcTWvrDBBtn_6vKi7LY-1fkhTNTxsOHeUCuzk4vT7426_Mv306O1w0IxkozstEaNYy9hE5KI4S1zggAAeNg0NnBCAdWoXXIlWqlhdU49B2X40pIYUEckE87380yzmihHl3T6E3ys0n3Ohqv_90Ef6Ov453mrL6sV6vq8O7BIcWfC-aiZ58Bp8kEjEvWbc9lK1nLhoq-_Q-9jUsKNV-lWt52Axdb6v2OghRzTuger-FMb9vUuzb1nzYr_uZpgkf4b3fiN2YSniY</recordid><startdate>20230414</startdate><enddate>20230414</enddate><creator>Chatterjee, Neha</creator><creator>Ekka, Nishith M</creator><creator>Mahajan, Mayank</creator><creator>Kumar, Binay</creator><creator>Kumar, Nabu</creator><creator>Zia, Arquam</creator><creator>Devarajan, Aravind</creator><creator>Kujur, Archana D</creator><creator>Sinha, Dipendra K</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230414</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study</title><author>Chatterjee, Neha ; Ekka, Nishith M ; Mahajan, Mayank ; Kumar, Binay ; Kumar, Nabu ; Zia, Arquam ; Devarajan, Aravind ; Kujur, Archana D ; Sinha, Dipendra K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b0bda79b85c655a33ddfa3cc3cb9aefd9a3fcd7edfe17725dc4b98615b4353dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Cytokines</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism</topic><topic>Epidemiology/Public Health</topic><topic>Foot diseases</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Leg ulcers</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peripheral neuropathy</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Student's t-test</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekka, Nishith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Mayank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Binay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Nabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zia, Arquam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devarajan, Aravind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kujur, Archana D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Dipendra K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatterjee, Neha</au><au>Ekka, Nishith M</au><au>Mahajan, Mayank</au><au>Kumar, Binay</au><au>Kumar, Nabu</au><au>Zia, Arquam</au><au>Devarajan, Aravind</au><au>Kujur, Archana D</au><au>Sinha, Dipendra K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2023-04-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e37570</spage><pages>e37570-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major cause of lower limb amputations. Many treatment recommendations have been proposed. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate when combined with mupirocin ointment, in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer in comparison to topical mupirocin alone, in terms of healing rates. This open-labeled randomized study was conducted on 108 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate and mupirocin combination, compared to topical mupirocin alone. The patients were administered the same parenteral antibiotic, and wounds were subjected to daily dressing. The healing rates (determined by the percentage reduction in wound area) in the two groups were calculated. The mean healing rates in both groups were expressed in percentage and compared using the Student's t-test. A total of 108 patients were included in the study. Male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The incidence of diabetic foot was the highest (50.9%) in the age group of 50-59 years. The mean age of the study population was 51 years. The incidence of diabetic foot ulcers was highest in the months of July-August (42%). A total of 71.2% patients had random blood sugar levels between 150-200 mg/dL, and 72.2% patients had diabetes for five to 10 years. The mean±standard deviation (SD) of the healing rates in the sucralfate and mupirocin combination group and the control group were 16.2±7.3% and 14.5±6.6%, respectively. Comparison of the means by Student's t-test failed to show a statistical difference in healing rates between the two groups (p=0.201). We concluded that the addition of topical sucralfate does not show any obvious benefits in terms of healing rates in diabetic foot ulcers as compared to mupirocin alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>37197136</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.37570</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37570
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10184874
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Age groups
Cytokines
Debridement
Diabetes
Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism
Epidemiology/Public Health
Foot diseases
General Surgery
Leg ulcers
Patients
Peripheral neuropathy
Population
Regression analysis
Student's t-test
Variance analysis
Wound healing
title Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A07%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Topical%20Sucralfate%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20Diabetic%20Foot%20Ulcers:%20An%20Open-Labeled%20Randomized%20Study&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Chatterjee,%20Neha&rft.date=2023-04-14&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e37570&rft.pages=e37570-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.37570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2821269139%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b0bda79b85c655a33ddfa3cc3cb9aefd9a3fcd7edfe17725dc4b98615b4353dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821269139&rft_id=info:pmid/37197136&rfr_iscdi=true