Loading…

Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains

Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontarget...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biometrics 2023-06, Vol.79 (2), p.1534-1545
Main Authors: Etievant, Lola, Sampson, Joshua N., Gail, Mitchell H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3
container_end_page 1545
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1534
container_title Biometrics
container_volume 79
creator Etievant, Lola
Sampson, Joshua N.
Gail, Mitchell H.
description Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontargeted strains are unaffected by vaccination, we regard the secondary outcome as a negative control outcome and show how using such data can (i) increase the precision of the estimated vaccine efficacy against targeted strains in randomized trials and (ii) reduce confounding bias of that same estimate in observational studies. For objective (i), we augment the primary outcome estimating equation with a function of the secondary outcome that is unbiased for zero. For objective (ii), we jointly estimate the treatment effects on the primary and secondary outcomes. If the bias induced by the unmeasured confounders is similar for both types of outcomes, as is plausible for factors that influence the general risk of infection, then we can use the estimated efficacy against the secondary outcomes to remove the bias from estimated efficacy against the primary outcome. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches in studies of HPV vaccines that only target a few highly carcinogenic strains. In this example, using nontargeted strains increased precision in randomized trials modestly but reduced bias in observational studies substantially.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/biom.13663
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10189807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2827420294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9PwjAUxRujEURf_ABmiW8mw_7Zuu7JKFEhweCDGt-aruugBDpsN8i-vYUh0Rf70vTe3zn3pgeASwT7yJ_bTJfLPiKUkiPQRXGEQhhheAy6EEIakgh9dsCZc3P_TGOIT0GHxCRKEsi6YDUy0irhtJkGqii01MrIJhAmD6zKa7mtZ1q4YDNTJhDOKbdjh68fwVpI3xeVLk2rFV6ZNUG9I0xpKmGnqlL5jnaVFdq4c3BSiIVTF_u7B96fHt8Gw3A8eR4N7sehjBAhIcsopkwIWsQxolkek5QxJSTLoCxySTGLBC5YUqQkwTFFmKE4wUimjEDoVaQH7lrfVZ0tVS6V8fMXfGX1UtiGl0Lzvx2jZ3xarjmCiKUMJt7heu9gy69auYrPy9oavzTHDCf-i3EaeeqmpaQtnbOqOIxAkG_j4dt4-C4eD1_9XuqA_uThAdQCG71QzT9W_GE0eWlNvwHD_pwc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2827420294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>Etievant, Lola ; Sampson, Joshua N. ; Gail, Mitchell H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Etievant, Lola ; Sampson, Joshua N. ; Gail, Mitchell H.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontargeted strains are unaffected by vaccination, we regard the secondary outcome as a negative control outcome and show how using such data can (i) increase the precision of the estimated vaccine efficacy against targeted strains in randomized trials and (ii) reduce confounding bias of that same estimate in observational studies. For objective (i), we augment the primary outcome estimating equation with a function of the secondary outcome that is unbiased for zero. For objective (ii), we jointly estimate the treatment effects on the primary and secondary outcomes. If the bias induced by the unmeasured confounders is similar for both types of outcomes, as is plausible for factors that influence the general risk of infection, then we can use the estimated efficacy against the secondary outcomes to remove the bias from estimated efficacy against the primary outcome. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches in studies of HPV vaccines that only target a few highly carcinogenic strains. In this example, using nontargeted strains increased precision in randomized trials modestly but reduced bias in observational studies substantially.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-341X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/biom.13663</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35347708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>augmented estimating equations ; Bias ; Carcinogens ; Clinical trials ; confounding bias ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Effectiveness ; Health risk assessment ; HPV ; Human papillomavirus ; Humans ; Immunization ; Incidence ; Medical research ; negative control outcome ; Observational studies ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Strains (organisms) ; Vaccination ; Vaccine efficacy ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Biometrics, 2023-06, Vol.79 (2), p.1534-1545</ispartof><rights>2022 The International Biometric Society.</rights><rights>2023 The International Biometric Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7562-3550</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etievant, Lola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampson, Joshua N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gail, Mitchell H.</creatorcontrib><title>Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains</title><title>Biometrics</title><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><description>Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontargeted strains are unaffected by vaccination, we regard the secondary outcome as a negative control outcome and show how using such data can (i) increase the precision of the estimated vaccine efficacy against targeted strains in randomized trials and (ii) reduce confounding bias of that same estimate in observational studies. For objective (i), we augment the primary outcome estimating equation with a function of the secondary outcome that is unbiased for zero. For objective (ii), we jointly estimate the treatment effects on the primary and secondary outcomes. If the bias induced by the unmeasured confounders is similar for both types of outcomes, as is plausible for factors that influence the general risk of infection, then we can use the estimated efficacy against the secondary outcomes to remove the bias from estimated efficacy against the primary outcome. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches in studies of HPV vaccines that only target a few highly carcinogenic strains. In this example, using nontargeted strains increased precision in randomized trials modestly but reduced bias in observational studies substantially.</description><subject>augmented estimating equations</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>confounding bias</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>HPV</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>negative control outcome</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine efficacy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0006-341X</issn><issn>1541-0420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV9PwjAUxRujEURf_ABmiW8mw_7Zuu7JKFEhweCDGt-aruugBDpsN8i-vYUh0Rf70vTe3zn3pgeASwT7yJ_bTJfLPiKUkiPQRXGEQhhheAy6EEIakgh9dsCZc3P_TGOIT0GHxCRKEsi6YDUy0irhtJkGqii01MrIJhAmD6zKa7mtZ1q4YDNTJhDOKbdjh68fwVpI3xeVLk2rFV6ZNUG9I0xpKmGnqlL5jnaVFdq4c3BSiIVTF_u7B96fHt8Gw3A8eR4N7sehjBAhIcsopkwIWsQxolkek5QxJSTLoCxySTGLBC5YUqQkwTFFmKE4wUimjEDoVaQH7lrfVZ0tVS6V8fMXfGX1UtiGl0Lzvx2jZ3xarjmCiKUMJt7heu9gy69auYrPy9oavzTHDCf-i3EaeeqmpaQtnbOqOIxAkG_j4dt4-C4eD1_9XuqA_uThAdQCG71QzT9W_GE0eWlNvwHD_pwc</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Etievant, Lola</creator><creator>Sampson, Joshua N.</creator><creator>Gail, Mitchell H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-3550</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains</title><author>Etievant, Lola ; Sampson, Joshua N. ; Gail, Mitchell H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>augmented estimating equations</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>confounding bias</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>HPV</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>negative control outcome</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine efficacy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etievant, Lola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampson, Joshua N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gail, Mitchell H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etievant, Lola</au><au>Sampson, Joshua N.</au><au>Gail, Mitchell H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains</atitle><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1534</spage><epage>1545</epage><pages>1534-1545</pages><issn>0006-341X</issn><eissn>1541-0420</eissn><abstract>Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontargeted strains are unaffected by vaccination, we regard the secondary outcome as a negative control outcome and show how using such data can (i) increase the precision of the estimated vaccine efficacy against targeted strains in randomized trials and (ii) reduce confounding bias of that same estimate in observational studies. For objective (i), we augment the primary outcome estimating equation with a function of the secondary outcome that is unbiased for zero. For objective (ii), we jointly estimate the treatment effects on the primary and secondary outcomes. If the bias induced by the unmeasured confounders is similar for both types of outcomes, as is plausible for factors that influence the general risk of infection, then we can use the estimated efficacy against the secondary outcomes to remove the bias from estimated efficacy against the primary outcome. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches in studies of HPV vaccines that only target a few highly carcinogenic strains. In this example, using nontargeted strains increased precision in randomized trials modestly but reduced bias in observational studies substantially.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35347708</pmid><doi>10.1111/biom.13663</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-3550</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-341X
ispartof Biometrics, 2023-06, Vol.79 (2), p.1534-1545
issn 0006-341X
1541-0420
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10189807
source Oxford Journals Online; EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks
subjects augmented estimating equations
Bias
Carcinogens
Clinical trials
confounding bias
Disease control
Disease prevention
Effectiveness
Health risk assessment
HPV
Human papillomavirus
Humans
Immunization
Incidence
Medical research
negative control outcome
Observational studies
Papillomavirus Infections - complications
Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control
Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use
Strains (organisms)
Vaccination
Vaccine efficacy
Vaccines
title Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A31%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increasing%20efficiency%20and%20reducing%20bias%20when%20assessing%20HPV%20vaccination%20efficacy%20by%20using%20nontargeted%20HPV%20strains&rft.jtitle=Biometrics&rft.au=Etievant,%20Lola&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1534&rft.epage=1545&rft.pages=1534-1545&rft.issn=0006-341X&rft.eissn=1541-0420&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/biom.13663&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2827420294%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2827420294&rft_id=info:pmid/35347708&rfr_iscdi=true