Loading…
Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains
Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontarget...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biometrics 2023-06, Vol.79 (2), p.1534-1545 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3 |
container_end_page | 1545 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1534 |
container_title | Biometrics |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Etievant, Lola Sampson, Joshua N. Gail, Mitchell H. |
description | Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontargeted strains are unaffected by vaccination, we regard the secondary outcome as a negative control outcome and show how using such data can (i) increase the precision of the estimated vaccine efficacy against targeted strains in randomized trials and (ii) reduce confounding bias of that same estimate in observational studies. For objective (i), we augment the primary outcome estimating equation with a function of the secondary outcome that is unbiased for zero. For objective (ii), we jointly estimate the treatment effects on the primary and secondary outcomes. If the bias induced by the unmeasured confounders is similar for both types of outcomes, as is plausible for factors that influence the general risk of infection, then we can use the estimated efficacy against the secondary outcomes to remove the bias from estimated efficacy against the primary outcome. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches in studies of HPV vaccines that only target a few highly carcinogenic strains. In this example, using nontargeted strains increased precision in randomized trials modestly but reduced bias in observational studies substantially. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/biom.13663 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10189807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2827420294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9PwjAUxRujEURf_ABmiW8mw_7Zuu7JKFEhweCDGt-aruugBDpsN8i-vYUh0Rf70vTe3zn3pgeASwT7yJ_bTJfLPiKUkiPQRXGEQhhheAy6EEIakgh9dsCZc3P_TGOIT0GHxCRKEsi6YDUy0irhtJkGqii01MrIJhAmD6zKa7mtZ1q4YDNTJhDOKbdjh68fwVpI3xeVLk2rFV6ZNUG9I0xpKmGnqlL5jnaVFdq4c3BSiIVTF_u7B96fHt8Gw3A8eR4N7sehjBAhIcsopkwIWsQxolkek5QxJSTLoCxySTGLBC5YUqQkwTFFmKE4wUimjEDoVaQH7lrfVZ0tVS6V8fMXfGX1UtiGl0Lzvx2jZ3xarjmCiKUMJt7heu9gy69auYrPy9oavzTHDCf-i3EaeeqmpaQtnbOqOIxAkG_j4dt4-C4eD1_9XuqA_uThAdQCG71QzT9W_GE0eWlNvwHD_pwc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2827420294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>Etievant, Lola ; Sampson, Joshua N. ; Gail, Mitchell H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Etievant, Lola ; Sampson, Joshua N. ; Gail, Mitchell H.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontargeted strains are unaffected by vaccination, we regard the secondary outcome as a negative control outcome and show how using such data can (i) increase the precision of the estimated vaccine efficacy against targeted strains in randomized trials and (ii) reduce confounding bias of that same estimate in observational studies. For objective (i), we augment the primary outcome estimating equation with a function of the secondary outcome that is unbiased for zero. For objective (ii), we jointly estimate the treatment effects on the primary and secondary outcomes. If the bias induced by the unmeasured confounders is similar for both types of outcomes, as is plausible for factors that influence the general risk of infection, then we can use the estimated efficacy against the secondary outcomes to remove the bias from estimated efficacy against the primary outcome. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches in studies of HPV vaccines that only target a few highly carcinogenic strains. In this example, using nontargeted strains increased precision in randomized trials modestly but reduced bias in observational studies substantially.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-341X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/biom.13663</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35347708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>augmented estimating equations ; Bias ; Carcinogens ; Clinical trials ; confounding bias ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Effectiveness ; Health risk assessment ; HPV ; Human papillomavirus ; Humans ; Immunization ; Incidence ; Medical research ; negative control outcome ; Observational studies ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Strains (organisms) ; Vaccination ; Vaccine efficacy ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Biometrics, 2023-06, Vol.79 (2), p.1534-1545</ispartof><rights>2022 The International Biometric Society.</rights><rights>2023 The International Biometric Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7562-3550</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etievant, Lola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampson, Joshua N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gail, Mitchell H.</creatorcontrib><title>Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains</title><title>Biometrics</title><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><description>Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontargeted strains are unaffected by vaccination, we regard the secondary outcome as a negative control outcome and show how using such data can (i) increase the precision of the estimated vaccine efficacy against targeted strains in randomized trials and (ii) reduce confounding bias of that same estimate in observational studies. For objective (i), we augment the primary outcome estimating equation with a function of the secondary outcome that is unbiased for zero. For objective (ii), we jointly estimate the treatment effects on the primary and secondary outcomes. If the bias induced by the unmeasured confounders is similar for both types of outcomes, as is plausible for factors that influence the general risk of infection, then we can use the estimated efficacy against the secondary outcomes to remove the bias from estimated efficacy against the primary outcome. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches in studies of HPV vaccines that only target a few highly carcinogenic strains. In this example, using nontargeted strains increased precision in randomized trials modestly but reduced bias in observational studies substantially.</description><subject>augmented estimating equations</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>confounding bias</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>HPV</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>negative control outcome</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine efficacy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0006-341X</issn><issn>1541-0420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV9PwjAUxRujEURf_ABmiW8mw_7Zuu7JKFEhweCDGt-aruugBDpsN8i-vYUh0Rf70vTe3zn3pgeASwT7yJ_bTJfLPiKUkiPQRXGEQhhheAy6EEIakgh9dsCZc3P_TGOIT0GHxCRKEsi6YDUy0irhtJkGqii01MrIJhAmD6zKa7mtZ1q4YDNTJhDOKbdjh68fwVpI3xeVLk2rFV6ZNUG9I0xpKmGnqlL5jnaVFdq4c3BSiIVTF_u7B96fHt8Gw3A8eR4N7sehjBAhIcsopkwIWsQxolkek5QxJSTLoCxySTGLBC5YUqQkwTFFmKE4wUimjEDoVaQH7lrfVZ0tVS6V8fMXfGX1UtiGl0Lzvx2jZ3xarjmCiKUMJt7heu9gy69auYrPy9oavzTHDCf-i3EaeeqmpaQtnbOqOIxAkG_j4dt4-C4eD1_9XuqA_uThAdQCG71QzT9W_GE0eWlNvwHD_pwc</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Etievant, Lola</creator><creator>Sampson, Joshua N.</creator><creator>Gail, Mitchell H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-3550</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains</title><author>Etievant, Lola ; Sampson, Joshua N. ; Gail, Mitchell H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>augmented estimating equations</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>confounding bias</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>HPV</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>negative control outcome</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine efficacy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etievant, Lola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampson, Joshua N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gail, Mitchell H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etievant, Lola</au><au>Sampson, Joshua N.</au><au>Gail, Mitchell H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains</atitle><jtitle>Biometrics</jtitle><addtitle>Biometrics</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1534</spage><epage>1545</epage><pages>1534-1545</pages><issn>0006-341X</issn><eissn>1541-0420</eissn><abstract>Studies of vaccine efficacy often record both the incidence of vaccine‐targeted virus strains (primary outcome) and the incidence of nontargeted strains (secondary outcome). However, standard estimates of vaccine efficacy on targeted strains ignore the data on nontargeted strains. Assuming nontargeted strains are unaffected by vaccination, we regard the secondary outcome as a negative control outcome and show how using such data can (i) increase the precision of the estimated vaccine efficacy against targeted strains in randomized trials and (ii) reduce confounding bias of that same estimate in observational studies. For objective (i), we augment the primary outcome estimating equation with a function of the secondary outcome that is unbiased for zero. For objective (ii), we jointly estimate the treatment effects on the primary and secondary outcomes. If the bias induced by the unmeasured confounders is similar for both types of outcomes, as is plausible for factors that influence the general risk of infection, then we can use the estimated efficacy against the secondary outcomes to remove the bias from estimated efficacy against the primary outcome. We demonstrate the utility of these approaches in studies of HPV vaccines that only target a few highly carcinogenic strains. In this example, using nontargeted strains increased precision in randomized trials modestly but reduced bias in observational studies substantially.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35347708</pmid><doi>10.1111/biom.13663</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-3550</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-341X |
ispartof | Biometrics, 2023-06, Vol.79 (2), p.1534-1545 |
issn | 0006-341X 1541-0420 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10189807 |
source | Oxford Journals Online; EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks |
subjects | augmented estimating equations Bias Carcinogens Clinical trials confounding bias Disease control Disease prevention Effectiveness Health risk assessment HPV Human papillomavirus Humans Immunization Incidence Medical research negative control outcome Observational studies Papillomavirus Infections - complications Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use Strains (organisms) Vaccination Vaccine efficacy Vaccines |
title | Increasing efficiency and reducing bias when assessing HPV vaccination efficacy by using nontargeted HPV strains |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A31%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increasing%20efficiency%20and%20reducing%20bias%20when%20assessing%20HPV%20vaccination%20efficacy%20by%20using%20nontargeted%20HPV%20strains&rft.jtitle=Biometrics&rft.au=Etievant,%20Lola&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1534&rft.epage=1545&rft.pages=1534-1545&rft.issn=0006-341X&rft.eissn=1541-0420&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/biom.13663&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2827420294%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-8b6268aa6f5516bd53988eac8b0cfdc6284a2f87f93725612815721c98300a6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2827420294&rft_id=info:pmid/35347708&rfr_iscdi=true |