Peri-procedural anesthesia and patient pain experience in pulmonary vein isolation by means of very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation (vHPSD) may reduce ablation times and improve patient tolerability, permitting pulmonary vein (PV) isolation under mild conscious sedation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Europace (London, England) England), 2023-05, Vol.25 (Supplement_1)
Main Authors: Poggi, S, Strisciuglio, T, Iuliano, A, Spiniello, G, Schillaci, V, De Simone, A, Stabile, G, Solimene, F
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page
container_title Europace (London, England)
container_volume 25
creator Poggi, S
Strisciuglio, T
Iuliano, A
Spiniello, G
Schillaci, V
De Simone, A
Stabile, G
Solimene, F
description Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation (vHPSD) may reduce ablation times and improve patient tolerability, permitting pulmonary vein (PV) isolation under mild conscious sedation. Purpose Evaluate the anesthetic drugs use and patients ‘pain experience during vHPSD PV isolation. Methods Thirty-three consecutive patients, with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), treated with QDot Micro catheter and vHPSD (90 w for 4 s) (vHPSD Group), were compared with the last 33 consecutive patients, with paroxysmal AF, treated with a surround flow contact force-sensing catheter guided by the ablation index (450 at anterior and superior sites at 50 W, 330 at posterior and inferior sites at 40 W) (AI Group). Anesthetic drugs (midazolam and fentanyl) use were compared as well as pain experience, measured using a 0-10 scale. Results All PVs were isolated. PV isolation ablation time in the vHPSD Group (5.9±1.4 min) was shorter than in the AI Group (25±11 min, p
doi_str_mv 10.1093/europace/euad122.744
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10207422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/europace/euad122.744</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/europace/euad122.744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1874-c5a7f8bbd5b8f5b0739cb6cf190e6f9f2ae1a7c10fd00eb0143028f8977e03883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUc1O3DAQjioqFbZ9gx78AlnGTrKOT6hatYCEBIf2bNnOmLjajY29oeyD9H07ywISt57mG30_1virqq8clhxUc45zjsk4JGAGLsRStu2H6pR3jagFKHFCGJSqOy7Up-qslN8AIIXqTqu_d5hDnXJ0OMzZbJiZsOxGLMEQHFgyu4DTjmaYGD4lUuPkkNGW5s02Tibv2SPSGkrckDhOzO7ZFs1UWPREET-G-5Gl-AczK2PMO3Z46lmazRCiz_gwU-qeGXuM-Fx99GZT8MvLXFS_fnz_ub6qb24vr9ffbmrHe9nWrjPS99YOne19Z0E2ytmV81wBrrzywiA30nHwAwBa4G0Dove9khKh6ftmUV0cc9Nstzg4upT-QKcctnSXjibo98wURn0fHzUHAbIVghLaY4LLsZSM_s3MQR_K0a_l6JdyNJVDtvOjLc7p_xz_ABNGnT8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peri-procedural anesthesia and patient pain experience in pulmonary vein isolation by means of very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Poggi, S ; Strisciuglio, T ; Iuliano, A ; Spiniello, G ; Schillaci, V ; De Simone, A ; Stabile, G ; Solimene, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Poggi, S ; Strisciuglio, T ; Iuliano, A ; Spiniello, G ; Schillaci, V ; De Simone, A ; Stabile, G ; Solimene, F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation (vHPSD) may reduce ablation times and improve patient tolerability, permitting pulmonary vein (PV) isolation under mild conscious sedation. Purpose Evaluate the anesthetic drugs use and patients ‘pain experience during vHPSD PV isolation. Methods Thirty-three consecutive patients, with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), treated with QDot Micro catheter and vHPSD (90 w for 4 s) (vHPSD Group), were compared with the last 33 consecutive patients, with paroxysmal AF, treated with a surround flow contact force-sensing catheter guided by the ablation index (450 at anterior and superior sites at 50 W, 330 at posterior and inferior sites at 40 W) (AI Group). Anesthetic drugs (midazolam and fentanyl) use were compared as well as pain experience, measured using a 0-10 scale. Results All PVs were isolated. PV isolation ablation time in the vHPSD Group (5.9±1.4 min) was shorter than in the AI Group (25±11 min, p&lt;0.001). Pain experience was significantly lower in vHPSD group (4.5±2 vs 6.6±1.8, p&lt; 0.001). No patients required general anesthesia; fentanyl use was required in 4 vHPSD Group patients vs 25 AI Group patients (p&lt;0.001). A lower dose of midazolam was required in vHPSD Group (2.3±1.2 mg vs 3.6±1.7 mg, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions vHPSD radiofrequency ablation for PVI can be performed under conscious sedation using only benzodiazepine in most of patients without compromising patient pain experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad122.744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Europace (London, England), 2023-05, Vol.25 (Supplement_1)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207422/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10207422/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poggi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strisciuglio, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iuliano, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiniello, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schillaci, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Simone, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stabile, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solimene, F</creatorcontrib><title>Peri-procedural anesthesia and patient pain experience in pulmonary vein isolation by means of very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation</title><title>Europace (London, England)</title><description>Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation (vHPSD) may reduce ablation times and improve patient tolerability, permitting pulmonary vein (PV) isolation under mild conscious sedation. Purpose Evaluate the anesthetic drugs use and patients ‘pain experience during vHPSD PV isolation. Methods Thirty-three consecutive patients, with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), treated with QDot Micro catheter and vHPSD (90 w for 4 s) (vHPSD Group), were compared with the last 33 consecutive patients, with paroxysmal AF, treated with a surround flow contact force-sensing catheter guided by the ablation index (450 at anterior and superior sites at 50 W, 330 at posterior and inferior sites at 40 W) (AI Group). Anesthetic drugs (midazolam and fentanyl) use were compared as well as pain experience, measured using a 0-10 scale. Results All PVs were isolated. PV isolation ablation time in the vHPSD Group (5.9±1.4 min) was shorter than in the AI Group (25±11 min, p&lt;0.001). Pain experience was significantly lower in vHPSD group (4.5±2 vs 6.6±1.8, p&lt; 0.001). No patients required general anesthesia; fentanyl use was required in 4 vHPSD Group patients vs 25 AI Group patients (p&lt;0.001). A lower dose of midazolam was required in vHPSD Group (2.3±1.2 mg vs 3.6±1.7 mg, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions vHPSD radiofrequency ablation for PVI can be performed under conscious sedation using only benzodiazepine in most of patients without compromising patient pain experience.</description><issn>1099-5129</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUc1O3DAQjioqFbZ9gx78AlnGTrKOT6hatYCEBIf2bNnOmLjajY29oeyD9H07ywISt57mG30_1virqq8clhxUc45zjsk4JGAGLsRStu2H6pR3jagFKHFCGJSqOy7Up-qslN8AIIXqTqu_d5hDnXJ0OMzZbJiZsOxGLMEQHFgyu4DTjmaYGD4lUuPkkNGW5s02Tibv2SPSGkrckDhOzO7ZFs1UWPREET-G-5Gl-AczK2PMO3Z46lmazRCiz_gwU-qeGXuM-Fx99GZT8MvLXFS_fnz_ub6qb24vr9ffbmrHe9nWrjPS99YOne19Z0E2ytmV81wBrrzywiA30nHwAwBa4G0Dove9khKh6ftmUV0cc9Nstzg4upT-QKcctnSXjibo98wURn0fHzUHAbIVghLaY4LLsZSM_s3MQR_K0a_l6JdyNJVDtvOjLc7p_xz_ABNGnT8</recordid><startdate>20230524</startdate><enddate>20230524</enddate><creator>Poggi, S</creator><creator>Strisciuglio, T</creator><creator>Iuliano, A</creator><creator>Spiniello, G</creator><creator>Schillaci, V</creator><creator>De Simone, A</creator><creator>Stabile, G</creator><creator>Solimene, F</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230524</creationdate><title>Peri-procedural anesthesia and patient pain experience in pulmonary vein isolation by means of very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation</title><author>Poggi, S ; Strisciuglio, T ; Iuliano, A ; Spiniello, G ; Schillaci, V ; De Simone, A ; Stabile, G ; Solimene, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1874-c5a7f8bbd5b8f5b0739cb6cf190e6f9f2ae1a7c10fd00eb0143028f8977e03883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poggi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strisciuglio, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iuliano, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiniello, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schillaci, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Simone, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stabile, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solimene, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poggi, S</au><au>Strisciuglio, T</au><au>Iuliano, A</au><au>Spiniello, G</au><au>Schillaci, V</au><au>De Simone, A</au><au>Stabile, G</au><au>Solimene, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peri-procedural anesthesia and patient pain experience in pulmonary vein isolation by means of very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation</atitle><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle><date>2023-05-24</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><issn>1099-5129</issn><eissn>1532-2092</eissn><abstract>Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation (vHPSD) may reduce ablation times and improve patient tolerability, permitting pulmonary vein (PV) isolation under mild conscious sedation. Purpose Evaluate the anesthetic drugs use and patients ‘pain experience during vHPSD PV isolation. Methods Thirty-three consecutive patients, with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), treated with QDot Micro catheter and vHPSD (90 w for 4 s) (vHPSD Group), were compared with the last 33 consecutive patients, with paroxysmal AF, treated with a surround flow contact force-sensing catheter guided by the ablation index (450 at anterior and superior sites at 50 W, 330 at posterior and inferior sites at 40 W) (AI Group). Anesthetic drugs (midazolam and fentanyl) use were compared as well as pain experience, measured using a 0-10 scale. Results All PVs were isolated. PV isolation ablation time in the vHPSD Group (5.9±1.4 min) was shorter than in the AI Group (25±11 min, p&lt;0.001). Pain experience was significantly lower in vHPSD group (4.5±2 vs 6.6±1.8, p&lt; 0.001). No patients required general anesthesia; fentanyl use was required in 4 vHPSD Group patients vs 25 AI Group patients (p&lt;0.001). A lower dose of midazolam was required in vHPSD Group (2.3±1.2 mg vs 3.6±1.7 mg, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions vHPSD radiofrequency ablation for PVI can be performed under conscious sedation using only benzodiazepine in most of patients without compromising patient pain experience.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/europace/euad122.744</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-5129
ispartof Europace (London, England), 2023-05, Vol.25 (Supplement_1)
issn 1099-5129
1532-2092
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10207422
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central
title Peri-procedural anesthesia and patient pain experience in pulmonary vein isolation by means of very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A49%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peri-procedural%20anesthesia%20and%20patient%20pain%20experience%20in%20pulmonary%20vein%20isolation%20by%20means%20of%20very%20high%20power%20short%20duration%20radiofrequency%20ablation&rft.jtitle=Europace%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Poggi,%20S&rft.date=2023-05-24&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.issn=1099-5129&rft.eissn=1532-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/europace/euad122.744&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/europace/euad122.744%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1874-c5a7f8bbd5b8f5b0739cb6cf190e6f9f2ae1a7c10fd00eb0143028f8977e03883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/europace/euad122.744&rfr_iscdi=true