Loading…

Optimal pacing modes after cardiac transplantation: is synchronisation of recipient and donor atria beneficial?

Objective—To investigate the response of the transplanted heart to different pacing modes and to synchronisation of the recipient and donor atria in terms of cardiac output at rest.Design—Doppler derived cardiac output measurements at three pacing rates (90/min, 110/min and 130/min) in five pacing m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Heart Journal 1992-08, Vol.68 (8), p.195-198
Main Authors: Parry, Gareth, Malbut, Katie, Dark, John H, Bexton, Rodney S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective—To investigate the response of the transplanted heart to different pacing modes and to synchronisation of the recipient and donor atria in terms of cardiac output at rest.Design—Doppler derived cardiac output measurements at three pacing rates (90/min, 110/min and 130/min) in five pacing modes: right ventricular pacing, donor atrial pacing, recipient-donor synchronous pacing, donor atrial-ventricular sequential pacing, and synchronous recipient-donor atrial-ventricular sequential pacing.Patients—11 healthy cardiac transplant recipients with three pairs of epicardial leads inserted at transplantation.Results—Donor atrial pacing (+11% overall) and donor atrial-ventricular sequential pacing (+8% overall) were significantly better than right ventricular pacing (p < 0·001) at all pacing rates. Synchronised pacing of recipient and donor atrial segments did not confer additional benefit in either atrial or atrial-ventricular sequential modes of pacing in terms of cardiac output at rest at these fixed rates.Conclusions—Atrial pacing or atrial-ventricular sequential pacing appear to be appropriate modes in cardiac transplant recipients. Synchronisation of recipient and donor atrial segments in this study produced no additional benefit. Chronotropic competence in these patients may, however, result in improved exercise capacity and deserves further investigation.
ISSN:0007-0769
1355-6037
1468-201X
2053-5864
DOI:10.1136/hrt.68.8.195