Loading…

Domain-General and Domain-Specific Electrophysiological Markers of Cognitive Distance Coding for What , Where , and When Memory Retrieval

The , , and components of episodic memory can be differentiated based on their distinctive domain-specific underlying neural correlates. However, recent studies have proposed that a common neural mechanism of conceptual mapping may be involved in the coding of cognitive distance across all domains....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of neuroscience 2023-06, Vol.43 (23), p.4304-4314
Main Authors: Park, Sang-Eon, Lee, Jeonghyun, Lee, Sang Ah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-3231cb25b1cb64f953a901b15342a39cf7798b60975627a87eca389d2992129f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-3231cb25b1cb64f953a901b15342a39cf7798b60975627a87eca389d2992129f3
container_end_page 4314
container_issue 23
container_start_page 4304
container_title The Journal of neuroscience
container_volume 43
creator Park, Sang-Eon
Lee, Jeonghyun
Lee, Sang Ah
description The , , and components of episodic memory can be differentiated based on their distinctive domain-specific underlying neural correlates. However, recent studies have proposed that a common neural mechanism of conceptual mapping may be involved in the coding of cognitive distance across all domains. In this study, we provide evidence that both domain-specific and domain-general processes occur simultaneously during memory retrieval by identifying distinctive and common neural representations for mapping (i.e., semantic distance), (i.e., spatial distance), and (i.e., temporal distance) using scalp EEG from 47 healthy participants (age 21-30, 26 male and 21 female). First, we found that all three components commonly showed a positive correlation between cognitive distance and slow theta power (2.5-5 Hz) in parietal channels. Meanwhile, fast theta power (5-8.5 Hz) specifically represented spatial and temporal distance in occipital and parietal channels, respectively. Additionally, we identified a unique correlate of temporal distance coding in frontal/parietal slow theta power during the early phase of retrieval. All of the above neural markers of cognitive mapping, both domain-general and specific, were associated with individual differences in memory accuracy. The Cognitive Map Theory was originally founded to explain how we remember and organize the immense amount of spatial information that we face when we navigate. However, memory research has recently trended in the direction of emphasizing the generalizability of cognitive mapping mechanisms to information in any domain, represented as distances in an abstract conceptual space. In a single study, we show that both common and unique neural coding of semantic distance (i.e., ), spatial distance (i.e., ), and temporal distance (i.e., ) simultaneously support episodic memory retrieval. Our results suggest that our ability to accurately distinguish between memories is achieved through an integration of domain-specific and domain-general neurocognitive mechanisms that work in parallel.
doi_str_mv 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0261-23.2023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10254998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2809547592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-3231cb25b1cb64f953a901b15342a39cf7798b60975627a87eca389d2992129f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUc1OGzEYtFBRSWlfAVnqpQc2-Ge9Xp-qKgRKBUWCIo6W1_k2Md21g72JlEfoW9cRaQS9eKz55ht7NAidUDKmgvGzHz-nD3e395OrMWEVLRgfM8L4ARrlqSpYSeg7NCJMkqIqZXmEPqT0RAiRhMr36IhLyqUkYoT-nIfeOF9cgodoOmz8DO-o-yVY1zqLpx3YIYblYpNc6MLc2Sy8MfE3xIRDiydh7t3g1oDPXRqMt5CpmfNz3IaIHxdmwKcZIELG7QP57vEN9CFu8B0M0cHadB_RYWu6BJ92eIweLqa_Jt-L69vLq8m368JyJYaCM05tw0STz6psleBGEdpQwUtmuLKtlKpuKqKkqJg0tQRreK1mTClGmWr5Mfr64rtcNT3MLPghB9fL6HoTNzoYp99OvFvoeVhrSpgolaqzw5edQwzPK0iD7l2y0HXGQ1glzWqiRCmFYln6-T_pU1hFn_NlFROiEpyUWVW9qGwMKUVo97-hRG_r1vu69bZunZlt3Xnx5HWW_dq_fvlfxwynSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825565304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Domain-General and Domain-Specific Electrophysiological Markers of Cognitive Distance Coding for What , Where , and When Memory Retrieval</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Park, Sang-Eon ; Lee, Jeonghyun ; Lee, Sang Ah</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Sang-Eon ; Lee, Jeonghyun ; Lee, Sang Ah</creatorcontrib><description>The , , and components of episodic memory can be differentiated based on their distinctive domain-specific underlying neural correlates. However, recent studies have proposed that a common neural mechanism of conceptual mapping may be involved in the coding of cognitive distance across all domains. In this study, we provide evidence that both domain-specific and domain-general processes occur simultaneously during memory retrieval by identifying distinctive and common neural representations for mapping (i.e., semantic distance), (i.e., spatial distance), and (i.e., temporal distance) using scalp EEG from 47 healthy participants (age 21-30, 26 male and 21 female). First, we found that all three components commonly showed a positive correlation between cognitive distance and slow theta power (2.5-5 Hz) in parietal channels. Meanwhile, fast theta power (5-8.5 Hz) specifically represented spatial and temporal distance in occipital and parietal channels, respectively. Additionally, we identified a unique correlate of temporal distance coding in frontal/parietal slow theta power during the early phase of retrieval. All of the above neural markers of cognitive mapping, both domain-general and specific, were associated with individual differences in memory accuracy. The Cognitive Map Theory was originally founded to explain how we remember and organize the immense amount of spatial information that we face when we navigate. However, memory research has recently trended in the direction of emphasizing the generalizability of cognitive mapping mechanisms to information in any domain, represented as distances in an abstract conceptual space. In a single study, we show that both common and unique neural coding of semantic distance (i.e., ), spatial distance (i.e., ), and temporal distance (i.e., ) simultaneously support episodic memory retrieval. Our results suggest that our ability to accurately distinguish between memories is achieved through an integration of domain-specific and domain-general neurocognitive mechanisms that work in parallel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0261-23.2023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37137705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain Mapping ; Channels ; Coding ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mapping ; Memory ; Memory, Episodic ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Retrieval ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2023-06, Vol.43 (23), p.4304-4314</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 the authors.</rights><rights>Copyright Society for Neuroscience Jun 7, 2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 the authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-3231cb25b1cb64f953a901b15342a39cf7798b60975627a87eca389d2992129f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-3231cb25b1cb64f953a901b15342a39cf7798b60975627a87eca389d2992129f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7887-6067</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254998/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254998/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37137705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Sang-Eon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeonghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Ah</creatorcontrib><title>Domain-General and Domain-Specific Electrophysiological Markers of Cognitive Distance Coding for What , Where , and When Memory Retrieval</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>The , , and components of episodic memory can be differentiated based on their distinctive domain-specific underlying neural correlates. However, recent studies have proposed that a common neural mechanism of conceptual mapping may be involved in the coding of cognitive distance across all domains. In this study, we provide evidence that both domain-specific and domain-general processes occur simultaneously during memory retrieval by identifying distinctive and common neural representations for mapping (i.e., semantic distance), (i.e., spatial distance), and (i.e., temporal distance) using scalp EEG from 47 healthy participants (age 21-30, 26 male and 21 female). First, we found that all three components commonly showed a positive correlation between cognitive distance and slow theta power (2.5-5 Hz) in parietal channels. Meanwhile, fast theta power (5-8.5 Hz) specifically represented spatial and temporal distance in occipital and parietal channels, respectively. Additionally, we identified a unique correlate of temporal distance coding in frontal/parietal slow theta power during the early phase of retrieval. All of the above neural markers of cognitive mapping, both domain-general and specific, were associated with individual differences in memory accuracy. The Cognitive Map Theory was originally founded to explain how we remember and organize the immense amount of spatial information that we face when we navigate. However, memory research has recently trended in the direction of emphasizing the generalizability of cognitive mapping mechanisms to information in any domain, represented as distances in an abstract conceptual space. In a single study, we show that both common and unique neural coding of semantic distance (i.e., ), spatial distance (i.e., ), and temporal distance (i.e., ) simultaneously support episodic memory retrieval. Our results suggest that our ability to accurately distinguish between memories is achieved through an integration of domain-specific and domain-general neurocognitive mechanisms that work in parallel.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Episodic</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Retrieval</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUc1OGzEYtFBRSWlfAVnqpQc2-Ge9Xp-qKgRKBUWCIo6W1_k2Md21g72JlEfoW9cRaQS9eKz55ht7NAidUDKmgvGzHz-nD3e395OrMWEVLRgfM8L4ARrlqSpYSeg7NCJMkqIqZXmEPqT0RAiRhMr36IhLyqUkYoT-nIfeOF9cgodoOmz8DO-o-yVY1zqLpx3YIYblYpNc6MLc2Sy8MfE3xIRDiydh7t3g1oDPXRqMt5CpmfNz3IaIHxdmwKcZIELG7QP57vEN9CFu8B0M0cHadB_RYWu6BJ92eIweLqa_Jt-L69vLq8m368JyJYaCM05tw0STz6psleBGEdpQwUtmuLKtlKpuKqKkqJg0tQRreK1mTClGmWr5Mfr64rtcNT3MLPghB9fL6HoTNzoYp99OvFvoeVhrSpgolaqzw5edQwzPK0iD7l2y0HXGQ1glzWqiRCmFYln6-T_pU1hFn_NlFROiEpyUWVW9qGwMKUVo97-hRG_r1vu69bZunZlt3Xnx5HWW_dq_fvlfxwynSQ</recordid><startdate>20230607</startdate><enddate>20230607</enddate><creator>Park, Sang-Eon</creator><creator>Lee, Jeonghyun</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Ah</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-6067</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230607</creationdate><title>Domain-General and Domain-Specific Electrophysiological Markers of Cognitive Distance Coding for What , Where , and When Memory Retrieval</title><author>Park, Sang-Eon ; Lee, Jeonghyun ; Lee, Sang Ah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-3231cb25b1cb64f953a901b15342a39cf7798b60975627a87eca389d2992129f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Episodic</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Retrieval</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Sang-Eon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeonghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Ah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Sang-Eon</au><au>Lee, Jeonghyun</au><au>Lee, Sang Ah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Domain-General and Domain-Specific Electrophysiological Markers of Cognitive Distance Coding for What , Where , and When Memory Retrieval</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2023-06-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>4304</spage><epage>4314</epage><pages>4304-4314</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>The , , and components of episodic memory can be differentiated based on their distinctive domain-specific underlying neural correlates. However, recent studies have proposed that a common neural mechanism of conceptual mapping may be involved in the coding of cognitive distance across all domains. In this study, we provide evidence that both domain-specific and domain-general processes occur simultaneously during memory retrieval by identifying distinctive and common neural representations for mapping (i.e., semantic distance), (i.e., spatial distance), and (i.e., temporal distance) using scalp EEG from 47 healthy participants (age 21-30, 26 male and 21 female). First, we found that all three components commonly showed a positive correlation between cognitive distance and slow theta power (2.5-5 Hz) in parietal channels. Meanwhile, fast theta power (5-8.5 Hz) specifically represented spatial and temporal distance in occipital and parietal channels, respectively. Additionally, we identified a unique correlate of temporal distance coding in frontal/parietal slow theta power during the early phase of retrieval. All of the above neural markers of cognitive mapping, both domain-general and specific, were associated with individual differences in memory accuracy. The Cognitive Map Theory was originally founded to explain how we remember and organize the immense amount of spatial information that we face when we navigate. However, memory research has recently trended in the direction of emphasizing the generalizability of cognitive mapping mechanisms to information in any domain, represented as distances in an abstract conceptual space. In a single study, we show that both common and unique neural coding of semantic distance (i.e., ), spatial distance (i.e., ), and temporal distance (i.e., ) simultaneously support episodic memory retrieval. Our results suggest that our ability to accurately distinguish between memories is achieved through an integration of domain-specific and domain-general neurocognitive mechanisms that work in parallel.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>37137705</pmid><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0261-23.2023</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-6067</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-6474
ispartof The Journal of neuroscience, 2023-06, Vol.43 (23), p.4304-4314
issn 0270-6474
1529-2401
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10254998
source PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Brain Mapping
Channels
Coding
Cognition
Cognitive ability
Electroencephalography
Female
Humans
Male
Mapping
Memory
Memory, Episodic
Mental Recall - physiology
Retrieval
Young Adult
title Domain-General and Domain-Specific Electrophysiological Markers of Cognitive Distance Coding for What , Where , and When Memory Retrieval
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A55%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Domain-General%20and%20Domain-Specific%20Electrophysiological%20Markers%20of%20Cognitive%20Distance%20Coding%20for%20What%20,%20Where%20,%20and%20When%20Memory%20Retrieval&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Park,%20Sang-Eon&rft.date=2023-06-07&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=4304&rft.epage=4314&rft.pages=4304-4314&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0261-23.2023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2809547592%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-3231cb25b1cb64f953a901b15342a39cf7798b60975627a87eca389d2992129f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825565304&rft_id=info:pmid/37137705&rfr_iscdi=true