Loading…

Decomposing the Response Time in Amblyopia: A Drift Diffusion Model Analysis

Amblyopes are known to have delayed response times (RT) in various visual tasks. We aim to investigate whether any factor other than the sensory deficit contributes to the delayed RT in amblyopia. Fifteen amblyopic (26.0 ± 4.50 years) and 15 normal (25.6 ± 2.90 years) participants took part in this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2023-06, Vol.64 (7), p.25-25
Main Authors: Ruan, Xiaowei, Lin, Liang, Ying, Xiaoxiao, Zhang, Hanyi, Yuan, Junli, Li, Cheng, Yang, Yan, Zhu, Jinli, Chen, Ruyin, Hou, Fang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-558381f95a326549ed7092c235f25f9e4be7e6d41ad8777ecba5d07f5cf292253
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-558381f95a326549ed7092c235f25f9e4be7e6d41ad8777ecba5d07f5cf292253
container_end_page 25
container_issue 7
container_start_page 25
container_title Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
container_volume 64
creator Ruan, Xiaowei
Lin, Liang
Ying, Xiaoxiao
Zhang, Hanyi
Yuan, Junli
Li, Cheng
Yang, Yan
Zhu, Jinli
Chen, Ruyin
Hou, Fang
description Amblyopes are known to have delayed response times (RT) in various visual tasks. We aim to investigate whether any factor other than the sensory deficit contributes to the delayed RT in amblyopia. Fifteen amblyopic (26.0 ± 4.50 years) and 15 normal (25.6 ± 2.90 years) participants took part in this study. The responses and RTs in an orientation identification task were collected for each participant with stimulus contrast adjusted to the multiples of individual's threshold. A drift diffusion model was used to fit to the response and RT data and to estimate the RT components. There was a significant difference in the RT between the amblyopic and normal groups (F(1, 28) = 6.75, P = 0.015) but no difference in the accuracy (F(1, 28) = 0.028, P = 0.868). The drift rate function in the amblyopic eye had a larger threshold (P = 0.001) and shallower slope (P = 0.006) than that of the fellow eye. The amblyopic group has a longer non-decision time than the normal group (F(1, 28) = 8.02, P = 0.008). The drift rate threshold correlated with the contrast sensitivity (P = 1.71 × 10-18) but the non-decision time did not (P = 0.393). Both sensory and post-sensory factors contributed to the delayed RT in amblyopia. The effect of the sensory loss in V1 on RT can be compensated by increasing stimulus contrast, and the post-sensory delay provides evidence for higher-level deficits in amblyopia.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.64.7.25
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10278554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2826219622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-558381f95a326549ed7092c235f25f9e4be7e6d41ad8777ecba5d07f5cf292253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1Lw0AQxRdRrFZvnmWPHkzNzmaziRcprV9QEaSel00y264k2ZhNC_3vbW0t9TQD8-PN4z1Crlg4YCyWd9Yt_SCOBnIA4oicMSEgEDLhxwd7j5x7_xWGwBiEp6THJWdJFPEzMhlj7qrGeVvPaDdH-oG-cbVHOrUVUlvTYZWVK9dYfU-HdNxa09GxNWbhravpmyuwpMNalytv_QU5Mbr0eLmbffL59DgdvQST9-fX0XAS5DwRXSBEwhNmUqE5xCJKsZBhCjlwYUCYFKMMJcZFxHSRSCkxz7QoQmlEbiAFELxPHra6zSKrsMix7lpdqqa1lW5Xymmr_l9qO1czt1QsBJkIEa0VbnYKrfteoO9UZX2OZalrdAuvIIEYWBoDrNHbLZq3zvsWzf4PC9WmAbVpQMWRkurX2_Whtz38Fzn_AbkPgog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2826219622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decomposing the Response Time in Amblyopia: A Drift Diffusion Model Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Ruan, Xiaowei ; Lin, Liang ; Ying, Xiaoxiao ; Zhang, Hanyi ; Yuan, Junli ; Li, Cheng ; Yang, Yan ; Zhu, Jinli ; Chen, Ruyin ; Hou, Fang</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Xiaowei ; Lin, Liang ; Ying, Xiaoxiao ; Zhang, Hanyi ; Yuan, Junli ; Li, Cheng ; Yang, Yan ; Zhu, Jinli ; Chen, Ruyin ; Hou, Fang</creatorcontrib><description>Amblyopes are known to have delayed response times (RT) in various visual tasks. We aim to investigate whether any factor other than the sensory deficit contributes to the delayed RT in amblyopia. Fifteen amblyopic (26.0 ± 4.50 years) and 15 normal (25.6 ± 2.90 years) participants took part in this study. The responses and RTs in an orientation identification task were collected for each participant with stimulus contrast adjusted to the multiples of individual's threshold. A drift diffusion model was used to fit to the response and RT data and to estimate the RT components. There was a significant difference in the RT between the amblyopic and normal groups (F(1, 28) = 6.75, P = 0.015) but no difference in the accuracy (F(1, 28) = 0.028, P = 0.868). The drift rate function in the amblyopic eye had a larger threshold (P = 0.001) and shallower slope (P = 0.006) than that of the fellow eye. The amblyopic group has a longer non-decision time than the normal group (F(1, 28) = 8.02, P = 0.008). The drift rate threshold correlated with the contrast sensitivity (P = 1.71 × 10-18) but the non-decision time did not (P = 0.393). Both sensory and post-sensory factors contributed to the delayed RT in amblyopia. The effect of the sensory loss in V1 on RT can be compensated by increasing stimulus contrast, and the post-sensory delay provides evidence for higher-level deficits in amblyopia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0146-0404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.7.25</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37318443</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Amblyopia ; Contrast Sensitivity ; Humans ; Reaction Time ; Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics</subject><ispartof>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science, 2023-06, Vol.64 (7), p.25-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2023 The Authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-558381f95a326549ed7092c235f25f9e4be7e6d41ad8777ecba5d07f5cf292253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-558381f95a326549ed7092c235f25f9e4be7e6d41ad8777ecba5d07f5cf292253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278554/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278554/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318443$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hanyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jinli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ruyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Fang</creatorcontrib><title>Decomposing the Response Time in Amblyopia: A Drift Diffusion Model Analysis</title><title>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</title><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><description>Amblyopes are known to have delayed response times (RT) in various visual tasks. We aim to investigate whether any factor other than the sensory deficit contributes to the delayed RT in amblyopia. Fifteen amblyopic (26.0 ± 4.50 years) and 15 normal (25.6 ± 2.90 years) participants took part in this study. The responses and RTs in an orientation identification task were collected for each participant with stimulus contrast adjusted to the multiples of individual's threshold. A drift diffusion model was used to fit to the response and RT data and to estimate the RT components. There was a significant difference in the RT between the amblyopic and normal groups (F(1, 28) = 6.75, P = 0.015) but no difference in the accuracy (F(1, 28) = 0.028, P = 0.868). The drift rate function in the amblyopic eye had a larger threshold (P = 0.001) and shallower slope (P = 0.006) than that of the fellow eye. The amblyopic group has a longer non-decision time than the normal group (F(1, 28) = 8.02, P = 0.008). The drift rate threshold correlated with the contrast sensitivity (P = 1.71 × 10-18) but the non-decision time did not (P = 0.393). Both sensory and post-sensory factors contributed to the delayed RT in amblyopia. The effect of the sensory loss in V1 on RT can be compensated by increasing stimulus contrast, and the post-sensory delay provides evidence for higher-level deficits in amblyopia.</description><subject>Amblyopia</subject><subject>Contrast Sensitivity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics</subject><issn>1552-5783</issn><issn>0146-0404</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1Lw0AQxRdRrFZvnmWPHkzNzmaziRcprV9QEaSel00y264k2ZhNC_3vbW0t9TQD8-PN4z1Crlg4YCyWd9Yt_SCOBnIA4oicMSEgEDLhxwd7j5x7_xWGwBiEp6THJWdJFPEzMhlj7qrGeVvPaDdH-oG-cbVHOrUVUlvTYZWVK9dYfU-HdNxa09GxNWbhravpmyuwpMNalytv_QU5Mbr0eLmbffL59DgdvQST9-fX0XAS5DwRXSBEwhNmUqE5xCJKsZBhCjlwYUCYFKMMJcZFxHSRSCkxz7QoQmlEbiAFELxPHra6zSKrsMix7lpdqqa1lW5Xymmr_l9qO1czt1QsBJkIEa0VbnYKrfteoO9UZX2OZalrdAuvIIEYWBoDrNHbLZq3zvsWzf4PC9WmAbVpQMWRkurX2_Whtz38Fzn_AbkPgog</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Ruan, Xiaowei</creator><creator>Lin, Liang</creator><creator>Ying, Xiaoxiao</creator><creator>Zhang, Hanyi</creator><creator>Yuan, Junli</creator><creator>Li, Cheng</creator><creator>Yang, Yan</creator><creator>Zhu, Jinli</creator><creator>Chen, Ruyin</creator><creator>Hou, Fang</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Decomposing the Response Time in Amblyopia: A Drift Diffusion Model Analysis</title><author>Ruan, Xiaowei ; Lin, Liang ; Ying, Xiaoxiao ; Zhang, Hanyi ; Yuan, Junli ; Li, Cheng ; Yang, Yan ; Zhu, Jinli ; Chen, Ruyin ; Hou, Fang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-558381f95a326549ed7092c235f25f9e4be7e6d41ad8777ecba5d07f5cf292253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Amblyopia</topic><topic>Contrast Sensitivity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hanyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jinli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ruyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Fang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruan, Xiaowei</au><au>Lin, Liang</au><au>Ying, Xiaoxiao</au><au>Zhang, Hanyi</au><au>Yuan, Junli</au><au>Li, Cheng</au><au>Yang, Yan</au><au>Zhu, Jinli</au><au>Chen, Ruyin</au><au>Hou, Fang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decomposing the Response Time in Amblyopia: A Drift Diffusion Model Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>25-25</pages><issn>1552-5783</issn><issn>0146-0404</issn><eissn>1552-5783</eissn><abstract>Amblyopes are known to have delayed response times (RT) in various visual tasks. We aim to investigate whether any factor other than the sensory deficit contributes to the delayed RT in amblyopia. Fifteen amblyopic (26.0 ± 4.50 years) and 15 normal (25.6 ± 2.90 years) participants took part in this study. The responses and RTs in an orientation identification task were collected for each participant with stimulus contrast adjusted to the multiples of individual's threshold. A drift diffusion model was used to fit to the response and RT data and to estimate the RT components. There was a significant difference in the RT between the amblyopic and normal groups (F(1, 28) = 6.75, P = 0.015) but no difference in the accuracy (F(1, 28) = 0.028, P = 0.868). The drift rate function in the amblyopic eye had a larger threshold (P = 0.001) and shallower slope (P = 0.006) than that of the fellow eye. The amblyopic group has a longer non-decision time than the normal group (F(1, 28) = 8.02, P = 0.008). The drift rate threshold correlated with the contrast sensitivity (P = 1.71 × 10-18) but the non-decision time did not (P = 0.393). Both sensory and post-sensory factors contributed to the delayed RT in amblyopia. The effect of the sensory loss in V1 on RT can be compensated by increasing stimulus contrast, and the post-sensory delay provides evidence for higher-level deficits in amblyopia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>37318443</pmid><doi>10.1167/iovs.64.7.25</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5783
ispartof Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023-06, Vol.64 (7), p.25-25
issn 1552-5783
0146-0404
1552-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10278554
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Amblyopia
Contrast Sensitivity
Humans
Reaction Time
Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics
title Decomposing the Response Time in Amblyopia: A Drift Diffusion Model Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A37%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decomposing%20the%20Response%20Time%20in%20Amblyopia:%20A%20Drift%20Diffusion%20Model%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20ophthalmology%20&%20visual%20science&rft.au=Ruan,%20Xiaowei&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=25-25&rft.issn=1552-5783&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/iovs.64.7.25&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2826219622%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-558381f95a326549ed7092c235f25f9e4be7e6d41ad8777ecba5d07f5cf292253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2826219622&rft_id=info:pmid/37318443&rfr_iscdi=true