Loading…

Caregiver object labels within supported and coordinated joint engagement during interaction with toddlers at elevated and typical likelihood of autism

Background Early in development, caregivers’ object labelling contributes to children's word learning. Language development is a bi‐directional process, and differences in joint engagement (JE) and language among children with developmental disabilities such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of language & communication disorders 2023-05, Vol.58 (3), p.672-686
Main Authors: Kushner, Elizabeth H., Britsch, Emily Roemer, Iverson, Jana M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4049-79daf514fcdb5dc712379613ad94692bf2b6db20381d9e5ec0c70d50856838d23
container_end_page 686
container_issue 3
container_start_page 672
container_title International journal of language & communication disorders
container_volume 58
creator Kushner, Elizabeth H.
Britsch, Emily Roemer
Iverson, Jana M.
description Background Early in development, caregivers’ object labelling contributes to children's word learning. Language development is a bi‐directional process, and differences in joint engagement (JE) and language among children with developmental disabilities such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may provide caregivers varying contexts and opportunities to provide object labels. However, potential variation in caregivers’ production of object labels and its relation to language development remain relatively unexplored among toddlers with ASD. Aims This study characterized the structural and functional features of object labels produced by parents of children with typical (TL) or elevated likelihood (EL) of ASD during naturalistic toy play. We examined features of object labels within two JE contexts, supported and coordinated JE, which are differentiated by a child's use of eye contact, as well as their relations with concurrent and future child language skills. Methods & Procedures The present study included 55 (TL = 12, EL = 43) children who completed a naturalistic parent–child interaction in the home at 18 months of age. Children's expressive and receptive language was assessed at 18, 24 and 36 months. At 36 months, EL children were assessed for ASD and classified as either EL‐No Diagnosis, EL‐Language Delay or EL‐ASD. Videos of interactions were divided into discrete engagement states, including supported and coordinated JE. All parent speech was transcribed and coded to capture structural (types, tokens, mean length of utterance (MLU), sentence position) and functional (follow‐in comments, directives, lead‐in labels) features of object labels as well as parent prompts for the child to produce a label. Outcomes & Results Parents of toddlers across outcome groups labelled objects at similar rates within each engagement state. However, parents of EL‐ASD children provided the lowest rates of prompts for labels in supported JE and the highest rate of labels as the final word of an utterance (sentence‐final position) in coordinated JE. Additionally, parent prompts in supported JE were related to concurrent child expressive language. Labels in sentence‐final position were positively related to later language outcome when delivered in supported JE but were associated with poorer language outcomes when delivered in coordinated JE. Conclusions & Implications Subtle differences in parent object labels across outcome groups demonstrate the role that child language an
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1460-6984.12809
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10318544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1373795</ericid><sourcerecordid>2740513059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4049-79daf514fcdb5dc712379613ad94692bf2b6db20381d9e5ec0c70d50856838d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUc-P1CAYbYzGXVfPnjQkXrx0FyjQ9mTMuP7YTOJFz4TC1w4jhRHa2cxf4r8rs92dqBe58PG9x_t4vKJ4SfAlyeuKMIFL0TbsktAGt4-K81Pnca4r0ZS0ofSseJbSFmNMCSdPi7NKMMpEW58Xv1YqwmD3EFHotqAn5FQHLqFbO22sR2ne7UKcwCDlDdIhRGO9Op63wfoJgR_UACPk0szR-gHlLkSlJxv8nQiagjEOYkIq0x3s1YPadNhZrRxy9gc4uwnBoNAjNU82jc-LJ71yCV7c7xfF94_X31afy_XXT19W79elZpi1Zd0a1XPCem06bnRNaFW3glTKtNkf7XraCdNRXDXEtMBBY11jw3HDRVM1hlYXxbtFdzd3IxidjUTl5C7aUcWDDMrKvxFvN3IIe0lwRRrOWFZ4e68Qw88Z0iRHmzQ4pzyEOUlaM8xJhXmbqW_-oW7DHH32J3N6lNIaC5FZVwtLx5BShP70GoLlMXV5zFgeM5Z3qecbr_80ceI_xJwJrxYCRKtP8PUNqer8XzzjYsFvrYPD_-bJm_XqwzL5NylUxHE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2802227066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caregiver object labels within supported and coordinated joint engagement during interaction with toddlers at elevated and typical likelihood of autism</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Kushner, Elizabeth H. ; Britsch, Emily Roemer ; Iverson, Jana M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kushner, Elizabeth H. ; Britsch, Emily Roemer ; Iverson, Jana M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Early in development, caregivers’ object labelling contributes to children's word learning. Language development is a bi‐directional process, and differences in joint engagement (JE) and language among children with developmental disabilities such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may provide caregivers varying contexts and opportunities to provide object labels. However, potential variation in caregivers’ production of object labels and its relation to language development remain relatively unexplored among toddlers with ASD. Aims This study characterized the structural and functional features of object labels produced by parents of children with typical (TL) or elevated likelihood (EL) of ASD during naturalistic toy play. We examined features of object labels within two JE contexts, supported and coordinated JE, which are differentiated by a child's use of eye contact, as well as their relations with concurrent and future child language skills. Methods &amp; Procedures The present study included 55 (TL = 12, EL = 43) children who completed a naturalistic parent–child interaction in the home at 18 months of age. Children's expressive and receptive language was assessed at 18, 24 and 36 months. At 36 months, EL children were assessed for ASD and classified as either EL‐No Diagnosis, EL‐Language Delay or EL‐ASD. Videos of interactions were divided into discrete engagement states, including supported and coordinated JE. All parent speech was transcribed and coded to capture structural (types, tokens, mean length of utterance (MLU), sentence position) and functional (follow‐in comments, directives, lead‐in labels) features of object labels as well as parent prompts for the child to produce a label. Outcomes &amp; Results Parents of toddlers across outcome groups labelled objects at similar rates within each engagement state. However, parents of EL‐ASD children provided the lowest rates of prompts for labels in supported JE and the highest rate of labels as the final word of an utterance (sentence‐final position) in coordinated JE. Additionally, parent prompts in supported JE were related to concurrent child expressive language. Labels in sentence‐final position were positively related to later language outcome when delivered in supported JE but were associated with poorer language outcomes when delivered in coordinated JE. Conclusions &amp; Implications Subtle differences in parent object labels across outcome groups demonstrate the role that child language and social engagement can play in influencing parent input and the cascading impact of this input on language development. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject Variations in caregiver object labelling can impact child language development. However, child characteristics such as language ability also actively shape the input caregivers provide, demonstrating the bi‐directionality of language development. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The present study demonstrates that characteristics of the engagement context in which a label is delivered may be important for understanding how object labelling relates to child language acquisition and whether this relation varies for children who face challenges in language learning. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? As child differences in social engagement emerge, parents may be more attuned to moments their children are engaging with eye contact. Caregiver‐mediated interventions might consider strategies that guide caregivers in recognizing engagement without eye contact as a similarly meaningful opportunity for learning and encourage the use of rich input within these moments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-2822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-6984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12809</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36424697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley</publisher><subject>At Risk Persons ; Autism ; Autism Spectrum Disorder ; Autism Spectrum Disorders ; Autistic Disorder ; caregiver language input ; Caregivers ; Child Language ; Child, Preschool ; Children &amp; youth ; Delayed language acquisition ; Developmental Disabilities ; Eye contact ; Humans ; joint engagement ; Labeling ; Language acquisition ; Language Development ; Language Skills ; Mean length of utterance ; Naming ; Native language acquisition ; Nonverbal Communication ; object labelling ; Parent Child Relationship ; Parent-child relations ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Receptive language ; Speech ; Toddlers ; Vocabulary Development ; Vocabulary learning</subject><ispartof>International journal of language &amp; communication disorders, 2023-05, Vol.58 (3), p.672-686</ispartof><rights>2022 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.</rights><rights>2023 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4049-79daf514fcdb5dc712379613ad94692bf2b6db20381d9e5ec0c70d50856838d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,31269</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1373795$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36424697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kushner, Elizabeth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britsch, Emily Roemer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iverson, Jana M.</creatorcontrib><title>Caregiver object labels within supported and coordinated joint engagement during interaction with toddlers at elevated and typical likelihood of autism</title><title>International journal of language &amp; communication disorders</title><addtitle>Int J Lang Commun Disord</addtitle><description>Background Early in development, caregivers’ object labelling contributes to children's word learning. Language development is a bi‐directional process, and differences in joint engagement (JE) and language among children with developmental disabilities such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may provide caregivers varying contexts and opportunities to provide object labels. However, potential variation in caregivers’ production of object labels and its relation to language development remain relatively unexplored among toddlers with ASD. Aims This study characterized the structural and functional features of object labels produced by parents of children with typical (TL) or elevated likelihood (EL) of ASD during naturalistic toy play. We examined features of object labels within two JE contexts, supported and coordinated JE, which are differentiated by a child's use of eye contact, as well as their relations with concurrent and future child language skills. Methods &amp; Procedures The present study included 55 (TL = 12, EL = 43) children who completed a naturalistic parent–child interaction in the home at 18 months of age. Children's expressive and receptive language was assessed at 18, 24 and 36 months. At 36 months, EL children were assessed for ASD and classified as either EL‐No Diagnosis, EL‐Language Delay or EL‐ASD. Videos of interactions were divided into discrete engagement states, including supported and coordinated JE. All parent speech was transcribed and coded to capture structural (types, tokens, mean length of utterance (MLU), sentence position) and functional (follow‐in comments, directives, lead‐in labels) features of object labels as well as parent prompts for the child to produce a label. Outcomes &amp; Results Parents of toddlers across outcome groups labelled objects at similar rates within each engagement state. However, parents of EL‐ASD children provided the lowest rates of prompts for labels in supported JE and the highest rate of labels as the final word of an utterance (sentence‐final position) in coordinated JE. Additionally, parent prompts in supported JE were related to concurrent child expressive language. Labels in sentence‐final position were positively related to later language outcome when delivered in supported JE but were associated with poorer language outcomes when delivered in coordinated JE. Conclusions &amp; Implications Subtle differences in parent object labels across outcome groups demonstrate the role that child language and social engagement can play in influencing parent input and the cascading impact of this input on language development. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject Variations in caregiver object labelling can impact child language development. However, child characteristics such as language ability also actively shape the input caregivers provide, demonstrating the bi‐directionality of language development. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The present study demonstrates that characteristics of the engagement context in which a label is delivered may be important for understanding how object labelling relates to child language acquisition and whether this relation varies for children who face challenges in language learning. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? As child differences in social engagement emerge, parents may be more attuned to moments their children are engaging with eye contact. Caregiver‐mediated interventions might consider strategies that guide caregivers in recognizing engagement without eye contact as a similarly meaningful opportunity for learning and encourage the use of rich input within these moments.</description><subject>At Risk Persons</subject><subject>Autism</subject><subject>Autism Spectrum Disorder</subject><subject>Autism Spectrum Disorders</subject><subject>Autistic Disorder</subject><subject>caregiver language input</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Delayed language acquisition</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities</subject><subject>Eye contact</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>joint engagement</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Mean length of utterance</subject><subject>Naming</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Nonverbal Communication</subject><subject>object labelling</subject><subject>Parent Child Relationship</subject><subject>Parent-child relations</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Receptive language</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Toddlers</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Vocabulary learning</subject><issn>1368-2822</issn><issn>1460-6984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUc-P1CAYbYzGXVfPnjQkXrx0FyjQ9mTMuP7YTOJFz4TC1w4jhRHa2cxf4r8rs92dqBe58PG9x_t4vKJ4SfAlyeuKMIFL0TbsktAGt4-K81Pnca4r0ZS0ofSseJbSFmNMCSdPi7NKMMpEW58Xv1YqwmD3EFHotqAn5FQHLqFbO22sR2ne7UKcwCDlDdIhRGO9Op63wfoJgR_UACPk0szR-gHlLkSlJxv8nQiagjEOYkIq0x3s1YPadNhZrRxy9gc4uwnBoNAjNU82jc-LJ71yCV7c7xfF94_X31afy_XXT19W79elZpi1Zd0a1XPCem06bnRNaFW3glTKtNkf7XraCdNRXDXEtMBBY11jw3HDRVM1hlYXxbtFdzd3IxidjUTl5C7aUcWDDMrKvxFvN3IIe0lwRRrOWFZ4e68Qw88Z0iRHmzQ4pzyEOUlaM8xJhXmbqW_-oW7DHH32J3N6lNIaC5FZVwtLx5BShP70GoLlMXV5zFgeM5Z3qecbr_80ceI_xJwJrxYCRKtP8PUNqer8XzzjYsFvrYPD_-bJm_XqwzL5NylUxHE</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Kushner, Elizabeth H.</creator><creator>Britsch, Emily Roemer</creator><creator>Iverson, Jana M.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Caregiver object labels within supported and coordinated joint engagement during interaction with toddlers at elevated and typical likelihood of autism</title><author>Kushner, Elizabeth H. ; Britsch, Emily Roemer ; Iverson, Jana M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4049-79daf514fcdb5dc712379613ad94692bf2b6db20381d9e5ec0c70d50856838d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>At Risk Persons</topic><topic>Autism</topic><topic>Autism Spectrum Disorder</topic><topic>Autism Spectrum Disorders</topic><topic>Autistic Disorder</topic><topic>caregiver language input</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Delayed language acquisition</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities</topic><topic>Eye contact</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>joint engagement</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Mean length of utterance</topic><topic>Naming</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Nonverbal Communication</topic><topic>object labelling</topic><topic>Parent Child Relationship</topic><topic>Parent-child relations</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Receptive language</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Toddlers</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Vocabulary learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kushner, Elizabeth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britsch, Emily Roemer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iverson, Jana M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of language &amp; communication disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kushner, Elizabeth H.</au><au>Britsch, Emily Roemer</au><au>Iverson, Jana M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1373795</ericid><atitle>Caregiver object labels within supported and coordinated joint engagement during interaction with toddlers at elevated and typical likelihood of autism</atitle><jtitle>International journal of language &amp; communication disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Lang Commun Disord</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>672</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>672-686</pages><issn>1368-2822</issn><eissn>1460-6984</eissn><abstract>Background Early in development, caregivers’ object labelling contributes to children's word learning. Language development is a bi‐directional process, and differences in joint engagement (JE) and language among children with developmental disabilities such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may provide caregivers varying contexts and opportunities to provide object labels. However, potential variation in caregivers’ production of object labels and its relation to language development remain relatively unexplored among toddlers with ASD. Aims This study characterized the structural and functional features of object labels produced by parents of children with typical (TL) or elevated likelihood (EL) of ASD during naturalistic toy play. We examined features of object labels within two JE contexts, supported and coordinated JE, which are differentiated by a child's use of eye contact, as well as their relations with concurrent and future child language skills. Methods &amp; Procedures The present study included 55 (TL = 12, EL = 43) children who completed a naturalistic parent–child interaction in the home at 18 months of age. Children's expressive and receptive language was assessed at 18, 24 and 36 months. At 36 months, EL children were assessed for ASD and classified as either EL‐No Diagnosis, EL‐Language Delay or EL‐ASD. Videos of interactions were divided into discrete engagement states, including supported and coordinated JE. All parent speech was transcribed and coded to capture structural (types, tokens, mean length of utterance (MLU), sentence position) and functional (follow‐in comments, directives, lead‐in labels) features of object labels as well as parent prompts for the child to produce a label. Outcomes &amp; Results Parents of toddlers across outcome groups labelled objects at similar rates within each engagement state. However, parents of EL‐ASD children provided the lowest rates of prompts for labels in supported JE and the highest rate of labels as the final word of an utterance (sentence‐final position) in coordinated JE. Additionally, parent prompts in supported JE were related to concurrent child expressive language. Labels in sentence‐final position were positively related to later language outcome when delivered in supported JE but were associated with poorer language outcomes when delivered in coordinated JE. Conclusions &amp; Implications Subtle differences in parent object labels across outcome groups demonstrate the role that child language and social engagement can play in influencing parent input and the cascading impact of this input on language development. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject Variations in caregiver object labelling can impact child language development. However, child characteristics such as language ability also actively shape the input caregivers provide, demonstrating the bi‐directionality of language development. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The present study demonstrates that characteristics of the engagement context in which a label is delivered may be important for understanding how object labelling relates to child language acquisition and whether this relation varies for children who face challenges in language learning. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? As child differences in social engagement emerge, parents may be more attuned to moments their children are engaging with eye contact. Caregiver‐mediated interventions might consider strategies that guide caregivers in recognizing engagement without eye contact as a similarly meaningful opportunity for learning and encourage the use of rich input within these moments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>36424697</pmid><doi>10.1111/1460-6984.12809</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-2822
ispartof International journal of language & communication disorders, 2023-05, Vol.58 (3), p.672-686
issn 1368-2822
1460-6984
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10318544
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects At Risk Persons
Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Autism Spectrum Disorders
Autistic Disorder
caregiver language input
Caregivers
Child Language
Child, Preschool
Children & youth
Delayed language acquisition
Developmental Disabilities
Eye contact
Humans
joint engagement
Labeling
Language acquisition
Language Development
Language Skills
Mean length of utterance
Naming
Native language acquisition
Nonverbal Communication
object labelling
Parent Child Relationship
Parent-child relations
Parents & parenting
Receptive language
Speech
Toddlers
Vocabulary Development
Vocabulary learning
title Caregiver object labels within supported and coordinated joint engagement during interaction with toddlers at elevated and typical likelihood of autism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A06%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caregiver%20object%20labels%20within%20supported%20and%20coordinated%20joint%20engagement%20during%20interaction%20with%20toddlers%20at%20elevated%20and%20typical%20likelihood%20of%20autism&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20language%20&%20communication%20disorders&rft.au=Kushner,%20Elizabeth%20H.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=672&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=672-686&rft.issn=1368-2822&rft.eissn=1460-6984&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1460-6984.12809&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2740513059%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4049-79daf514fcdb5dc712379613ad94692bf2b6db20381d9e5ec0c70d50856838d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2802227066&rft_id=info:pmid/36424697&rft_ericid=EJ1373795&rfr_iscdi=true