A Review of Unmet Needs – Making a Case for a High Dependency Rehabilitation Service

• Published in: BJPsych open 2023-07, Vol.9 (S1), p.S147-S147
• Main Authors: Fuller, Amanda, Abdelkader, Moustafa, McGill, Meenaxi, Robinson, Denzil, Smith, Joanne, Sigfid, Alice, Eyeoyibo, Mo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Audit; Mental health; Poster Presentations; Private placement; Rehabilitation
• ISSN: 2056-4724; 2056-4724
• DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.399

AimsThe Kent and Medway Partnership Trust (KMPT) Rehabilitation service strategy 2020-2025 in line with NICE guidance for Complex Psychosis 2020, sets out to deliver a complete mental health rehabilitation pathway with local provision of high dependency rehabilitation units (HDRU), open rehabilitation units and community rehabilitation provision across the county. There is a lack of HDRU provision in Kent and Medway in its rehabilitation pathway. All HDRU provision is by external providers, often out of area, dislocating people from family support and local resources essential for their recovery and integration. Kent has a relatively high number of out of area (OAT) placements based on national benchmark data (GIRFT). The proposal to develop a HDRU locally led to a review of local population needs for HDRU. The review with the existing OAT data provided information on the number of HDRU beds required in Kent and Medway.MethodsWe identified 564 patients who had had 5 or more Mental Health Act assessments, in cluster 16 and 17, more than 3 admissions to psychiatric inpatient units and with CTO recalls. Two senior clinicians reviewed these patients against the HDRU eligibility criteria. Demographics, diagnosis and comorbidities were also recorded.Results119/564 patients met the threshold for HDRU assessment. Using our conversation rate from referral to admission in our open rehab, it means about 20% (24) of this cohort would require treatment in a HDRU. Demographics, diagnosis and comorbidities were reviewed which gave important information about service provision requirements. This was compared with NICE guidance recommendations of 1 high dependency unit per 600,000 - 1,000,000. Therefore, based on this, we would be expected to have between 23 and 38 patients requiring HDRU treatment.ConclusionA high level of unmet need for HDRU exists in Kent and there is a need for further recognition of the relevance within the rehabilitation pathway. Lack of local provision of HDRUs means the use of longer, expensive and variable quality out of area or private placements. These can be not only detrimental for patients due to a loss of connection to an area and social network but a drain on resources. These results support the case for x2 12 bedded HDRUs. The lack of provision of HDRU impacts on the wider system and patient's timely access to appropriate treatment pathways.