Loading…
Providing the Right Support at the Right Time for People With Learning Disabilities: A Mixed-Methods Study to Identify Change Goals for a Demand, Capacity and Flow Quality Improvement Project
Aims1. To evaluate demand, capacity and flow of an integrated community learning disability service in a peri- and post-COVID-19 pandemic setting. 2. To improve flow of a community learning disability service. 3. To improve staff and service user satisfaction by engaging them and identifying common...
Saved in:
Published in: | BJPsych open 2023-07, Vol.9 (S1), p.S3-S4 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | S4 |
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | S3 |
container_title | BJPsych open |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Cai, James Barnett, Joshua Haberland, Kirsty Clarke, Melanie Fysh, Grace Chaplin, Catriona Lim, Ivy Martiello, Michele Hall, Ian Checkley, Laura |
description | Aims1. To evaluate demand, capacity and flow of an integrated community learning disability service in a peri- and post-COVID-19 pandemic setting. 2. To improve flow of a community learning disability service. 3. To improve staff and service user satisfaction by engaging them and identifying common priorities.MethodsWe collected demand and capacity data of all disciplines in a community learning disability service for 2021–2022.We carried out focus groups with service users and their carers (N = 5) and surveyed them with a questionnaire consisting of 6 quantitative and 2 qualitative questions (N = 63), investigating the impact of waiting times on service user experience.We surveyed staff from all disciplines (N = 20) with a questionnaire consisting of 3 qualitative questions, to identify their views on waiting times and areas to optimise.We performed thematic analysis on all qualitative responses. We analysed quantitative data with descriptive statistics.ResultsFrom 2021–22, the number of accepted referrals to individual disciplines increased: for example referrals to psychiatry increased by 51.6% and referrals to OT increased by 32%.With regard to flow, the ratio of discharges to accepted referrals in the psychiatry discipline decreased from 1.5:1 to 0.6:1.A significant proportion of service users reported waiting months (31%) or years (16%) to be seen by the learning disability team. 28% of service users reported additional problems while waiting to be seen. 31% were unaware whether they were on a waiting list or not. Quantitative data showed average waiting times for psychiatry services did not change from 2021–2022 (23.1 and 23.3 days respectively).Thematic analysis from service users’ responses revealed an anxiety about needs not being met; a feeling of problems deteriorating while waiting; and communication issues.Staff responses revealed desires to intervene sooner to prevent unnecessary deteriorations; and to increase team working between disciplines.ConclusionQuantitative data analysis suggests a greatly increased demand for our service following the COVID-19 pandemic.Our thematic analysis identifies concern of deterioration secondary to prolonged waiting times. It also highlights that communication could be improved.As a result of this mixed-methods approach, the following change ideas were generated and are now being tested:1. Improve communication with patients on waiting lists by testing an accessible customisable letter.2. Organise more joint |
doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bjo.2023.89 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10345553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bjo_2023_89</cupid><sourcerecordid>2833764877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1959-4ff4a68a67776c76b30ec91100201b0d7851292b9e5409618b8f5477a47dacf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFu1DAURSMEElXbFT_wJJaQwU6cOGGDqiktI01FoUUsLSd-STxK4tR2CvN1_TUcOoIisbL9fHx8pRtFryhZUVom76qdWSUkSVdF-Sw6SkiWx4wn7PmT_cvo1LkdIYRmnPGCHUUP19bca6XHFnyH8FW3nYebeZqM9SD9k-GtHhAaY-EazdQjfNe-gy1KOy6Pz7WTle611-jewxlc6Z-o4iv0nVEObvys9uANbBSOXjd7WHdybBEujezdb6uEcxzkqN7CWk6y1n4P4QQXvfkBX2bZL4PNMIW0OAQHhNw7rP1J9KIJCjw9rMfRt4uPt-tP8fbz5WZ9to1rWmZlzJqGybyQOec8r3lepQTrklJCEkIroniR0aRMqhIzRsqcFlXRZIxzybiSdZOmx9GHR-80VwOqOkSwsheT1YO0e2GkFv_ejLoTrbkXlKQsy7LF8PpgsOZuRufFzsx2DKFFUqQpz1nBeaDePFK1Nc5ZbP58QYlYahahZrHULIoy0PGBlkNltWrxr_R__C-6z6v4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833764877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Providing the Right Support at the Right Time for People With Learning Disabilities: A Mixed-Methods Study to Identify Change Goals for a Demand, Capacity and Flow Quality Improvement Project</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Cai, James ; Barnett, Joshua ; Haberland, Kirsty ; Clarke, Melanie ; Fysh, Grace ; Chaplin, Catriona ; Lim, Ivy ; Martiello, Michele ; Hall, Ian ; Checkley, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, James ; Barnett, Joshua ; Haberland, Kirsty ; Clarke, Melanie ; Fysh, Grace ; Chaplin, Catriona ; Lim, Ivy ; Martiello, Michele ; Hall, Ian ; Checkley, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>Aims1. To evaluate demand, capacity and flow of an integrated community learning disability service in a peri- and post-COVID-19 pandemic setting. 2. To improve flow of a community learning disability service. 3. To improve staff and service user satisfaction by engaging them and identifying common priorities.MethodsWe collected demand and capacity data of all disciplines in a community learning disability service for 2021–2022.We carried out focus groups with service users and their carers (N = 5) and surveyed them with a questionnaire consisting of 6 quantitative and 2 qualitative questions (N = 63), investigating the impact of waiting times on service user experience.We surveyed staff from all disciplines (N = 20) with a questionnaire consisting of 3 qualitative questions, to identify their views on waiting times and areas to optimise.We performed thematic analysis on all qualitative responses. We analysed quantitative data with descriptive statistics.ResultsFrom 2021–22, the number of accepted referrals to individual disciplines increased: for example referrals to psychiatry increased by 51.6% and referrals to OT increased by 32%.With regard to flow, the ratio of discharges to accepted referrals in the psychiatry discipline decreased from 1.5:1 to 0.6:1.A significant proportion of service users reported waiting months (31%) or years (16%) to be seen by the learning disability team. 28% of service users reported additional problems while waiting to be seen. 31% were unaware whether they were on a waiting list or not. Quantitative data showed average waiting times for psychiatry services did not change from 2021–2022 (23.1 and 23.3 days respectively).Thematic analysis from service users’ responses revealed an anxiety about needs not being met; a feeling of problems deteriorating while waiting; and communication issues.Staff responses revealed desires to intervene sooner to prevent unnecessary deteriorations; and to increase team working between disciplines.ConclusionQuantitative data analysis suggests a greatly increased demand for our service following the COVID-19 pandemic.Our thematic analysis identifies concern of deterioration secondary to prolonged waiting times. It also highlights that communication could be improved.As a result of this mixed-methods approach, the following change ideas were generated and are now being tested:1. Improve communication with patients on waiting lists by testing an accessible customisable letter.2. Organise more joint assessments and reviews of service users with multiple disciplines.3. Short-term allocation of more urgent casework via a new integrated health and social care duty system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-4724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-4724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.89</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Communication ; COVID-19 ; Disability ; Learning disabilities ; Mixed methods research ; Pandemics ; Psychiatry ; Quality improvement ; Questionnaires ; Rapid-Fire Presentations</subject><ispartof>BJPsych open, 2023-07, Vol.9 (S1), p.S3-S4</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2833764877/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2833764877?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,53791,53793,72960,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haberland, Kirsty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fysh, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaplin, Catriona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Ivy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martiello, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checkley, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Providing the Right Support at the Right Time for People With Learning Disabilities: A Mixed-Methods Study to Identify Change Goals for a Demand, Capacity and Flow Quality Improvement Project</title><title>BJPsych open</title><addtitle>BJPsych open</addtitle><description>Aims1. To evaluate demand, capacity and flow of an integrated community learning disability service in a peri- and post-COVID-19 pandemic setting. 2. To improve flow of a community learning disability service. 3. To improve staff and service user satisfaction by engaging them and identifying common priorities.MethodsWe collected demand and capacity data of all disciplines in a community learning disability service for 2021–2022.We carried out focus groups with service users and their carers (N = 5) and surveyed them with a questionnaire consisting of 6 quantitative and 2 qualitative questions (N = 63), investigating the impact of waiting times on service user experience.We surveyed staff from all disciplines (N = 20) with a questionnaire consisting of 3 qualitative questions, to identify their views on waiting times and areas to optimise.We performed thematic analysis on all qualitative responses. We analysed quantitative data with descriptive statistics.ResultsFrom 2021–22, the number of accepted referrals to individual disciplines increased: for example referrals to psychiatry increased by 51.6% and referrals to OT increased by 32%.With regard to flow, the ratio of discharges to accepted referrals in the psychiatry discipline decreased from 1.5:1 to 0.6:1.A significant proportion of service users reported waiting months (31%) or years (16%) to be seen by the learning disability team. 28% of service users reported additional problems while waiting to be seen. 31% were unaware whether they were on a waiting list or not. Quantitative data showed average waiting times for psychiatry services did not change from 2021–2022 (23.1 and 23.3 days respectively).Thematic analysis from service users’ responses revealed an anxiety about needs not being met; a feeling of problems deteriorating while waiting; and communication issues.Staff responses revealed desires to intervene sooner to prevent unnecessary deteriorations; and to increase team working between disciplines.ConclusionQuantitative data analysis suggests a greatly increased demand for our service following the COVID-19 pandemic.Our thematic analysis identifies concern of deterioration secondary to prolonged waiting times. It also highlights that communication could be improved.As a result of this mixed-methods approach, the following change ideas were generated and are now being tested:1. Improve communication with patients on waiting lists by testing an accessible customisable letter.2. Organise more joint assessments and reviews of service users with multiple disciplines.3. Short-term allocation of more urgent casework via a new integrated health and social care duty system.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rapid-Fire Presentations</subject><issn>2056-4724</issn><issn>2056-4724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcFu1DAURSMEElXbFT_wJJaQwU6cOGGDqiktI01FoUUsLSd-STxK4tR2CvN1_TUcOoIisbL9fHx8pRtFryhZUVom76qdWSUkSVdF-Sw6SkiWx4wn7PmT_cvo1LkdIYRmnPGCHUUP19bca6XHFnyH8FW3nYebeZqM9SD9k-GtHhAaY-EazdQjfNe-gy1KOy6Pz7WTle611-jewxlc6Z-o4iv0nVEObvys9uANbBSOXjd7WHdybBEujezdb6uEcxzkqN7CWk6y1n4P4QQXvfkBX2bZL4PNMIW0OAQHhNw7rP1J9KIJCjw9rMfRt4uPt-tP8fbz5WZ9to1rWmZlzJqGybyQOec8r3lepQTrklJCEkIroniR0aRMqhIzRsqcFlXRZIxzybiSdZOmx9GHR-80VwOqOkSwsheT1YO0e2GkFv_ejLoTrbkXlKQsy7LF8PpgsOZuRufFzsx2DKFFUqQpz1nBeaDePFK1Nc5ZbP58QYlYahahZrHULIoy0PGBlkNltWrxr_R__C-6z6v4</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Cai, James</creator><creator>Barnett, Joshua</creator><creator>Haberland, Kirsty</creator><creator>Clarke, Melanie</creator><creator>Fysh, Grace</creator><creator>Chaplin, Catriona</creator><creator>Lim, Ivy</creator><creator>Martiello, Michele</creator><creator>Hall, Ian</creator><creator>Checkley, Laura</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Providing the Right Support at the Right Time for People With Learning Disabilities: A Mixed-Methods Study to Identify Change Goals for a Demand, Capacity and Flow Quality Improvement Project</title><author>Cai, James ; Barnett, Joshua ; Haberland, Kirsty ; Clarke, Melanie ; Fysh, Grace ; Chaplin, Catriona ; Lim, Ivy ; Martiello, Michele ; Hall, Ian ; Checkley, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1959-4ff4a68a67776c76b30ec91100201b0d7851292b9e5409618b8f5477a47dacf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rapid-Fire Presentations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haberland, Kirsty</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fysh, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaplin, Catriona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Ivy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martiello, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checkley, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>CUP_剑桥大学出版社OA刊</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BJPsych open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, James</au><au>Barnett, Joshua</au><au>Haberland, Kirsty</au><au>Clarke, Melanie</au><au>Fysh, Grace</au><au>Chaplin, Catriona</au><au>Lim, Ivy</au><au>Martiello, Michele</au><au>Hall, Ian</au><au>Checkley, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Providing the Right Support at the Right Time for People With Learning Disabilities: A Mixed-Methods Study to Identify Change Goals for a Demand, Capacity and Flow Quality Improvement Project</atitle><jtitle>BJPsych open</jtitle><addtitle>BJPsych open</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S3</spage><epage>S4</epage><pages>S3-S4</pages><issn>2056-4724</issn><eissn>2056-4724</eissn><abstract>Aims1. To evaluate demand, capacity and flow of an integrated community learning disability service in a peri- and post-COVID-19 pandemic setting. 2. To improve flow of a community learning disability service. 3. To improve staff and service user satisfaction by engaging them and identifying common priorities.MethodsWe collected demand and capacity data of all disciplines in a community learning disability service for 2021–2022.We carried out focus groups with service users and their carers (N = 5) and surveyed them with a questionnaire consisting of 6 quantitative and 2 qualitative questions (N = 63), investigating the impact of waiting times on service user experience.We surveyed staff from all disciplines (N = 20) with a questionnaire consisting of 3 qualitative questions, to identify their views on waiting times and areas to optimise.We performed thematic analysis on all qualitative responses. We analysed quantitative data with descriptive statistics.ResultsFrom 2021–22, the number of accepted referrals to individual disciplines increased: for example referrals to psychiatry increased by 51.6% and referrals to OT increased by 32%.With regard to flow, the ratio of discharges to accepted referrals in the psychiatry discipline decreased from 1.5:1 to 0.6:1.A significant proportion of service users reported waiting months (31%) or years (16%) to be seen by the learning disability team. 28% of service users reported additional problems while waiting to be seen. 31% were unaware whether they were on a waiting list or not. Quantitative data showed average waiting times for psychiatry services did not change from 2021–2022 (23.1 and 23.3 days respectively).Thematic analysis from service users’ responses revealed an anxiety about needs not being met; a feeling of problems deteriorating while waiting; and communication issues.Staff responses revealed desires to intervene sooner to prevent unnecessary deteriorations; and to increase team working between disciplines.ConclusionQuantitative data analysis suggests a greatly increased demand for our service following the COVID-19 pandemic.Our thematic analysis identifies concern of deterioration secondary to prolonged waiting times. It also highlights that communication could be improved.As a result of this mixed-methods approach, the following change ideas were generated and are now being tested:1. Improve communication with patients on waiting lists by testing an accessible customisable letter.2. Organise more joint assessments and reviews of service users with multiple disciplines.3. Short-term allocation of more urgent casework via a new integrated health and social care duty system.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1192/bjo.2023.89</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2056-4724 |
ispartof | BJPsych open, 2023-07, Vol.9 (S1), p.S3-S4 |
issn | 2056-4724 2056-4724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10345553 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Communication COVID-19 Disability Learning disabilities Mixed methods research Pandemics Psychiatry Quality improvement Questionnaires Rapid-Fire Presentations |
title | Providing the Right Support at the Right Time for People With Learning Disabilities: A Mixed-Methods Study to Identify Change Goals for a Demand, Capacity and Flow Quality Improvement Project |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A37%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Providing%20the%20Right%20Support%20at%20the%20Right%20Time%20for%20People%20With%20Learning%20Disabilities:%20A%20Mixed-Methods%20Study%20to%20Identify%20Change%20Goals%20for%20a%20Demand,%20Capacity%20and%20Flow%20Quality%20Improvement%20Project&rft.jtitle=BJPsych%20open&rft.au=Cai,%20James&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S3&rft.epage=S4&rft.pages=S3-S4&rft.issn=2056-4724&rft.eissn=2056-4724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjo.2023.89&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2833764877%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1959-4ff4a68a67776c76b30ec91100201b0d7851292b9e5409618b8f5477a47dacf33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833764877&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1192_bjo_2023_89&rfr_iscdi=true |