There's an App for it: A systematic review of mobile apps providing information about abortion using a revised MARS scale

• Published in: PLOS digital health 2023-07, Vol.2 (7), p.e0000277-e0000277
• Main Authors: Stifani, Bianca M, Peters, Melanie, French, Katherine, Gill, Roopan K
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abortion; Biology and Life Sciences; Birth control; Computer and Information Sciences; Engineering and Technology; Family planning; Information sources; Medicine and Health Sciences; People and Places; Pregnancy; Reproductive health; Research and Analysis Methods; Researchers; Smartphones; Social Sciences; Systematic review
• ISSN: 2767-3170; 2767-3170
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000277

Mobile applications (apps) are increasingly being used to access health-related information, but it may be challenging for consumers to identify accurate and reliable platforms. We conducted a systematic review of applications that provide information about abortion. We searched the iTunes and Google Play stores and queried professional networks to identify relevant apps. To evaluate the apps, we used the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and added relevant abortion-specific elements. Two reviewers independently rated each app, and we report mean scores on a 5-point scale across the domains of engagement, functionality, esthetics, and information. We also rated app characteristics (including target population and reach), and number of desirable abortion-specific features. We defined recommended apps as those that achieved a score of 4.0 or above for the question: "would you recommend this app to people who may benefit from it?" Our search initially yielded 282 apps and we identified two additional apps through professional mailing lists. Most were irrelevant or not abortion-specific. We excluded 37 apps that sought to discourage users from seeking abortion. Only 10 apps met inclusion criteria for this review. The Euki app had the highest overall score (4.0). Half of the apps achieved a score of 3.0 or greater. Most of the apps had few desirable design features. Some apps provided significant information but had poor functionality. Only four apps met criteria for being recommended: Euki, Safe Abortion by Hesperian, Ipas Mexico, and Marie Stopes Mexico. In conclusion, we found few apps that provide unbiased information about abortion, and their quality varied greatly. App developers and abortion experts should consider designing additional apps that are clinically accurate, unbiased and well-functioning. We registered this review in the PROSPERO database (Registration # CRD42020195802).