Loading…

Proportion of Physicians Who Treat Patients With Greater Social and Clinical Risk and Physician Inclusion in Medicare Advantage Networks

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are expanding rapidly, now serving 50% of all Medicare enrollees. Little is known about how inclusion rates of physicians in MA plan networks vary by the social and clinical risks of their patients. To examine the association of physicians caring for patients with highe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JAMA health forum 2023-07, Vol.4 (7), p.e231991-e231991
Main Authors: Gong, Jung Ho, Johnston, Kenton J, Meyers, David J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9bddc763b2661b7967378513c55fe9eea4d190a0b3c85ee4e36cca315ed3576c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9bddc763b2661b7967378513c55fe9eea4d190a0b3c85ee4e36cca315ed3576c3
container_end_page e231991
container_issue 7
container_start_page e231991
container_title JAMA health forum
container_volume 4
creator Gong, Jung Ho
Johnston, Kenton J
Meyers, David J
description Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are expanding rapidly, now serving 50% of all Medicare enrollees. Little is known about how inclusion rates of physicians in MA plan networks vary by the social and clinical risks of their patients. To examine the association of physicians caring for patients with higher levels of social and clinical risk in traditional Medicare (TM) with the likelihood of inclusion in MA plan networks. This cross-sectional study evaluated the number of patients of physicians participating in TM Part B in 2019. The data analysis was conducted between June 2022 and March 2023. Quintiles of the proportion of patients who were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and average beneficiary hierarchical condition category (HCC) score (a measure of a patient's chronic disease burden that is used in risk adjustment and MA plan payment, where higher scores indicate higher risk) in the Part B TM program. The main outcomes were the proportion of MA plans and enrollees for which physicians were in network. The analysis sample included 259 932 physicians billing Medicare Part B in 2019. After adjusting for physician, patient, and county characteristics, physicians with the highest quintile of patients with dual eligibility were associated with a lower likelihood of being included in MA plans and being in network with MA enrollees than the lowest quintile physicians (MA inclusion rate, -3.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to -2.8%]; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1991
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10362476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2841021535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9bddc763b2661b7967378513c55fe9eea4d190a0b3c85ee4e36cca315ed3576c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS1ERatpXwEZsWEzg3_iJF6hagSlUqEjKGJpOc5N42liD7ZT1DfgsXFoGbVd2T7-7rGPDkJvKFlRQuj7rR51D3pIfefDNK4YYXxFpaQv0BEra7kktC5fPtofopMYt4QQJigtK_4KHfKqqCrJxBH6swl-50Oy3mHf4U1_F62x2kX8s_f4KoBOeKOTBZeyZFOPz2YNAv7uMzdg7Vq8HqyzJh--2XjzT9n74HNnhinO9tbhL9BmLgA-bW-1S_oa8FdIv324icfooNNDhJOHdYF-fPp4tf68vLg8O1-fXixNIVhayqZtTVXyhpUlbSqZ81S1oNwI0YEE0EVLJdGk4aYWAAXw0hjNqYCWi6o0fIE-3PvupmaE1uRgQQ9qF-yow53y2qqnN8726trfKkp4yYr89AK9e3AI_tcEManRRgPDoB34KSpWF5QwKrjI6Ntn6NZPweV8M8VF7khUmZL3lAk-xgDd_jeUqLlz9axzNXeu5s7z7OvHcfaT_xvmfwH-cq-P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2843526857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proportion of Physicians Who Treat Patients With Greater Social and Clinical Risk and Physician Inclusion in Medicare Advantage Networks</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Gong, Jung Ho ; Johnston, Kenton J ; Meyers, David J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gong, Jung Ho ; Johnston, Kenton J ; Meyers, David J</creatorcontrib><description>Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are expanding rapidly, now serving 50% of all Medicare enrollees. Little is known about how inclusion rates of physicians in MA plan networks vary by the social and clinical risks of their patients. To examine the association of physicians caring for patients with higher levels of social and clinical risk in traditional Medicare (TM) with the likelihood of inclusion in MA plan networks. This cross-sectional study evaluated the number of patients of physicians participating in TM Part B in 2019. The data analysis was conducted between June 2022 and March 2023. Quintiles of the proportion of patients who were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and average beneficiary hierarchical condition category (HCC) score (a measure of a patient's chronic disease burden that is used in risk adjustment and MA plan payment, where higher scores indicate higher risk) in the Part B TM program. The main outcomes were the proportion of MA plans and enrollees for which physicians were in network. The analysis sample included 259 932 physicians billing Medicare Part B in 2019. After adjusting for physician, patient, and county characteristics, physicians with the highest quintile of patients with dual eligibility were associated with a lower likelihood of being included in MA plans and being in network with MA enrollees than the lowest quintile physicians (MA inclusion rate, -3.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to -2.8%]; P &lt; .001; in-network enrollee proportion, -6.5% [95% CI, -7.0% to -6.0%]; P &lt; .001). Similarly, physicians with the highest quintile HCC score were associated with a lower likelihood of being included in MA plans and being in network with MA enrollees than the lowest quintile physicians (MA inclusion rate, -7.5% [95% CI, -7.9% to -7.2%]; P &lt; .001; in-network enrollee proportion, -18.7% [95% CI, -19.5% to -18.1%]; P &lt; .001). Physicians in medical specialties in the highest clinical risk group (highest quintile HCC score) were associated with a significantly lower likelihood of being in network with MA enrollees than those in the lowest clinical risk group (in-network enrollee proportion, -20.4% [95% CI, -21.1% to -19.8%]; P &lt; .001). This cross-sectional study of physicians participating in TM Part B in 2019 found that physicians with higher numbers of patients with social and medical risks in TM were significantly less likely to be associated with MA plans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2689-0186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2689-0186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1991</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37477925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Comments ; Cross-sectional studies ; Medicare ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Patients ; Physicians</subject><ispartof>JAMA health forum, 2023-07, Vol.4 (7), p.e231991-e231991</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2023 Gong JH et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9bddc763b2661b7967378513c55fe9eea4d190a0b3c85ee4e36cca315ed3576c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9bddc763b2661b7967378513c55fe9eea4d190a0b3c85ee4e36cca315ed3576c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2843526857?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37477925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gong, Jung Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Kenton J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, David J</creatorcontrib><title>Proportion of Physicians Who Treat Patients With Greater Social and Clinical Risk and Physician Inclusion in Medicare Advantage Networks</title><title>JAMA health forum</title><addtitle>JAMA Health Forum</addtitle><description>Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are expanding rapidly, now serving 50% of all Medicare enrollees. Little is known about how inclusion rates of physicians in MA plan networks vary by the social and clinical risks of their patients. To examine the association of physicians caring for patients with higher levels of social and clinical risk in traditional Medicare (TM) with the likelihood of inclusion in MA plan networks. This cross-sectional study evaluated the number of patients of physicians participating in TM Part B in 2019. The data analysis was conducted between June 2022 and March 2023. Quintiles of the proportion of patients who were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and average beneficiary hierarchical condition category (HCC) score (a measure of a patient's chronic disease burden that is used in risk adjustment and MA plan payment, where higher scores indicate higher risk) in the Part B TM program. The main outcomes were the proportion of MA plans and enrollees for which physicians were in network. The analysis sample included 259 932 physicians billing Medicare Part B in 2019. After adjusting for physician, patient, and county characteristics, physicians with the highest quintile of patients with dual eligibility were associated with a lower likelihood of being included in MA plans and being in network with MA enrollees than the lowest quintile physicians (MA inclusion rate, -3.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to -2.8%]; P &lt; .001; in-network enrollee proportion, -6.5% [95% CI, -7.0% to -6.0%]; P &lt; .001). Similarly, physicians with the highest quintile HCC score were associated with a lower likelihood of being included in MA plans and being in network with MA enrollees than the lowest quintile physicians (MA inclusion rate, -7.5% [95% CI, -7.9% to -7.2%]; P &lt; .001; in-network enrollee proportion, -18.7% [95% CI, -19.5% to -18.1%]; P &lt; .001). Physicians in medical specialties in the highest clinical risk group (highest quintile HCC score) were associated with a significantly lower likelihood of being in network with MA enrollees than those in the lowest clinical risk group (in-network enrollee proportion, -20.4% [95% CI, -21.1% to -19.8%]; P &lt; .001). This cross-sectional study of physicians participating in TM Part B in 2019 found that physicians with higher numbers of patients with social and medical risks in TM were significantly less likely to be associated with MA plans.</description><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><issn>2689-0186</issn><issn>2689-0186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS1ERatpXwEZsWEzg3_iJF6hagSlUqEjKGJpOc5N42liD7ZT1DfgsXFoGbVd2T7-7rGPDkJvKFlRQuj7rR51D3pIfefDNK4YYXxFpaQv0BEra7kktC5fPtofopMYt4QQJigtK_4KHfKqqCrJxBH6swl-50Oy3mHf4U1_F62x2kX8s_f4KoBOeKOTBZeyZFOPz2YNAv7uMzdg7Vq8HqyzJh--2XjzT9n74HNnhinO9tbhL9BmLgA-bW-1S_oa8FdIv324icfooNNDhJOHdYF-fPp4tf68vLg8O1-fXixNIVhayqZtTVXyhpUlbSqZ81S1oNwI0YEE0EVLJdGk4aYWAAXw0hjNqYCWi6o0fIE-3PvupmaE1uRgQQ9qF-yow53y2qqnN8726trfKkp4yYr89AK9e3AI_tcEManRRgPDoB34KSpWF5QwKrjI6Ntn6NZPweV8M8VF7khUmZL3lAk-xgDd_jeUqLlz9axzNXeu5s7z7OvHcfaT_xvmfwH-cq-P</recordid><startdate>20230721</startdate><enddate>20230721</enddate><creator>Gong, Jung Ho</creator><creator>Johnston, Kenton J</creator><creator>Meyers, David J</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230721</creationdate><title>Proportion of Physicians Who Treat Patients With Greater Social and Clinical Risk and Physician Inclusion in Medicare Advantage Networks</title><author>Gong, Jung Ho ; Johnston, Kenton J ; Meyers, David J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9bddc763b2661b7967378513c55fe9eea4d190a0b3c85ee4e36cca315ed3576c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gong, Jung Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Kenton J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyers, David J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PHMC-Proquest健康医学期刊库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA health forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gong, Jung Ho</au><au>Johnston, Kenton J</au><au>Meyers, David J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proportion of Physicians Who Treat Patients With Greater Social and Clinical Risk and Physician Inclusion in Medicare Advantage Networks</atitle><jtitle>JAMA health forum</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Health Forum</addtitle><date>2023-07-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e231991</spage><epage>e231991</epage><pages>e231991-e231991</pages><issn>2689-0186</issn><eissn>2689-0186</eissn><abstract>Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are expanding rapidly, now serving 50% of all Medicare enrollees. Little is known about how inclusion rates of physicians in MA plan networks vary by the social and clinical risks of their patients. To examine the association of physicians caring for patients with higher levels of social and clinical risk in traditional Medicare (TM) with the likelihood of inclusion in MA plan networks. This cross-sectional study evaluated the number of patients of physicians participating in TM Part B in 2019. The data analysis was conducted between June 2022 and March 2023. Quintiles of the proportion of patients who were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and average beneficiary hierarchical condition category (HCC) score (a measure of a patient's chronic disease burden that is used in risk adjustment and MA plan payment, where higher scores indicate higher risk) in the Part B TM program. The main outcomes were the proportion of MA plans and enrollees for which physicians were in network. The analysis sample included 259 932 physicians billing Medicare Part B in 2019. After adjusting for physician, patient, and county characteristics, physicians with the highest quintile of patients with dual eligibility were associated with a lower likelihood of being included in MA plans and being in network with MA enrollees than the lowest quintile physicians (MA inclusion rate, -3.0% [95% CI, -3.2% to -2.8%]; P &lt; .001; in-network enrollee proportion, -6.5% [95% CI, -7.0% to -6.0%]; P &lt; .001). Similarly, physicians with the highest quintile HCC score were associated with a lower likelihood of being included in MA plans and being in network with MA enrollees than the lowest quintile physicians (MA inclusion rate, -7.5% [95% CI, -7.9% to -7.2%]; P &lt; .001; in-network enrollee proportion, -18.7% [95% CI, -19.5% to -18.1%]; P &lt; .001). Physicians in medical specialties in the highest clinical risk group (highest quintile HCC score) were associated with a significantly lower likelihood of being in network with MA enrollees than those in the lowest clinical risk group (in-network enrollee proportion, -20.4% [95% CI, -21.1% to -19.8%]; P &lt; .001). This cross-sectional study of physicians participating in TM Part B in 2019 found that physicians with higher numbers of patients with social and medical risks in TM were significantly less likely to be associated with MA plans.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>37477925</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1991</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2689-0186
ispartof JAMA health forum, 2023-07, Vol.4 (7), p.e231991-e231991
issn 2689-0186
2689-0186
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10362476
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Comments
Cross-sectional studies
Medicare
Online Only
Original Investigation
Patients
Physicians
title Proportion of Physicians Who Treat Patients With Greater Social and Clinical Risk and Physician Inclusion in Medicare Advantage Networks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A41%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proportion%20of%20Physicians%20Who%20Treat%20Patients%20With%20Greater%20Social%20and%20Clinical%20Risk%20and%20Physician%20Inclusion%20in%20Medicare%20Advantage%20Networks&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20health%20forum&rft.au=Gong,%20Jung%20Ho&rft.date=2023-07-21&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e231991&rft.epage=e231991&rft.pages=e231991-e231991&rft.issn=2689-0186&rft.eissn=2689-0186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1991&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2841021535%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9bddc763b2661b7967378513c55fe9eea4d190a0b3c85ee4e36cca315ed3576c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2843526857&rft_id=info:pmid/37477925&rfr_iscdi=true