Racial/ethnic disparities in the distribution and effect of type and number of high-risk criteria on mortality in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy

• Published in: Arab Journal of Urology 2023-07, Vol.21 (3), p.135-141
• Main Authors: Chierigo, Francesco, Flammia, Rocco Simone, Sorce, Gabriele, Hoeh, Benedikt, Hohenhorst, Lukas, Panunzio, Andrea, Tian, Zhe, Saad, Fred, Graefen, Markus, Gallucci, Michele, Briganti, Alberto, Montorsi, Francesco, Chun, Felix K.H., Shariat, Shahrokh F., Antonelli, Alessandro, Guano, Giovanni, Mantica, Guglielmo, Borghesi, Marco, Suardi, Nazareno, Terrone, Carlo, Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: CSM; D'Amico high-risk criteria; Oncology/Reconstruction; race/ethnicity; radiotherapy; SEER
• ISSN: 2090-598X; 2090-598X; 2090-5998
• DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2148867

To assess differences in the distribution of type and number of D'Amico high-risk criteria (DHRCs) according to race/ethnicity (R/E) and their effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT). In the SEER database (2004-2016), we identified 31,002 PCa patients treated with RT with at least one DHRCs, namely PSA >20 ng/dL, biopsy Gleason Grade Group 4-5, and clinical T stage ≥T2c. Competing risks regression (CRR) model tested the association between DHRCs and 5-year CSM in all R/E subgroups. Of 31,002 patients, 20,894 (67%) were Caucasian, 5256 (17%) were African American, 2868 (9.3%) were Hispanic-Latino, and 1984 (6.4%) were Asian. The distributions of individual DHRCs and combinations of two DHRCs differed according to R/E, but not for the combination of three DHRCs. The effect related to the presence of a single DHRC, and combinations of two or three DHRCs on absolute CSM rates was lowest in Asians (1.2-6.8%), followed by in African Americans (2.3-12.2%) and Caucasians (2.3-12.1%), and highest in Hispanic/Latinos (1.7-13.8%). However, the opposite effect was observed in CRR, where hazard ratios were highest in Asians vs. other R/Es: Asians 1.00-2.59 vs. others 0.5-1.83 for one DHRC, Asians 3.4-4.75 vs. others 0.66-3.66 for two DHRCs, and Asians 7.22 vs. others 3.03-4.99 for all three DHRCs. R/E affects the proportions of DHRCs. Moreover, within the four examined R/E groups, the effect of DHRCs on absolute and relative CSM metrics also differed. Therefore, R/E-specific considerations may be warranted in high-risk PCa patients treated with RT.