Loading…

Tortoise or Hare? The Associations between Physical Activity Volume and Intensity Distribution and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Large Prospective Analysis of the UK Biobank

Analysis methods to determine the optimal combination of volume and intensity of objectively measured physical activity (PA) with prospective outcomes are limited. Participants in UK Biobank were recruited in the UK between 2006 and 2010. We linked the questionnaire and accelerometer with all-cause...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2023-07, Vol.20 (14), p.6401
Main Authors: Salway, Ruth, Augustin, Nicole Helene, Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-c463de71041921c04a793115acace00fb3a5ba48aca7ff789532b17cabb4be3
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page 6401
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 20
creator Salway, Ruth
Augustin, Nicole Helene
Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis
description Analysis methods to determine the optimal combination of volume and intensity of objectively measured physical activity (PA) with prospective outcomes are limited. Participants in UK Biobank were recruited in the UK between 2006 and 2010. We linked the questionnaire and accelerometer with all-cause mortality data from the NHS Information Centre and NHS Central Register up to April 2021. We developed a novel method, extending the penalized spline model of Augustin et al. to a smooth additive Cox model for survival data, and estimated the prospective relationship between intensity distribution and all-cause mortality, adjusting for the overall volume of PA. We followed 84,166 men and women (aged 40-69) for an average of 6.4 years (range 5.3-7.9), with an observed mortality rate of 22.2 deaths per 1000. Survival rates differed by PA volume quartile, with poorer outcomes for the lowest PA volumes. Participants with more sedentary to light intensity PA (250 mg) than average for a given volume of PA, had higher mortality rates than vice versa. Approximate hazard ratios were 0.83 (95% credible interval [CI]: 0.79, 0.88) for an average-risk profile compared to a high-risk profile and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.87) for a low-risk profile compared to an average-risk profile. A high- versus low-risk profile has the equivalent of 15 min more slow walking, but 10 min less moderate walking. At low PA volumes, increasing overall volume suggests the most benefit in reducing all-cause mortality risk. However, at higher overall volumes, substituting lighter with more vigorous intensity activity suggests greater benefit.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph20146401
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10378963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2843064016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-c463de71041921c04a793115acace00fb3a5ba48aca7ff789532b17cabb4be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUktvEzEQthCIlsCVI7LEhcsWe-3sg0uVhkcrgqggcF2NndnGqWMH21uUv8UvxNuWquVke-Z7jGeGkJecHQnRsrdmg2G3LhmXlWT8ETnkVcUKWTH--N79gDyLccOYaGTVPiUHop5yVglxSP4sfUjeRKQ-0FMIeEyXa6SzGL02kIx3kSpMvxEdPV_vo9Fg6Uwnc2XSnv70dtgiBbeiZy6hi2PwvYkpGDWM5OtUyoLfTLykvqcza4s5DNnvSzYGmwnv6IwuIFwgPQ8-7nAUzxU4sNkujqRR4MdnemK8Anf5nDzpwUZ8cXtOyPePH5bz02Lx9dPZfLYodNm0vNCyEiusOZO8LblmEupWcD4FDRoZ65WAqQLZ5Hfd93XTTkWpeK1BKalQTMjxjepuUFtcaXQpgO12wWwh7DsPpnuYcWbdXfirjjORxXJzJ-TNrULwvwaMqduaqNFacOiH2JWNlKxpJa8z9PV_0I0fQu7ANUqwcbZVRh3doHTuUwzY31XDWTduQ_dwGzLh1f0_3MH_jV_8BdRqtIo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2843064016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tortoise or Hare? The Associations between Physical Activity Volume and Intensity Distribution and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Large Prospective Analysis of the UK Biobank</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Salway, Ruth ; Augustin, Nicole Helene ; Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis</creator><creatorcontrib>Salway, Ruth ; Augustin, Nicole Helene ; Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis</creatorcontrib><description>Analysis methods to determine the optimal combination of volume and intensity of objectively measured physical activity (PA) with prospective outcomes are limited. Participants in UK Biobank were recruited in the UK between 2006 and 2010. We linked the questionnaire and accelerometer with all-cause mortality data from the NHS Information Centre and NHS Central Register up to April 2021. We developed a novel method, extending the penalized spline model of Augustin et al. to a smooth additive Cox model for survival data, and estimated the prospective relationship between intensity distribution and all-cause mortality, adjusting for the overall volume of PA. We followed 84,166 men and women (aged 40-69) for an average of 6.4 years (range 5.3-7.9), with an observed mortality rate of 22.2 deaths per 1000. Survival rates differed by PA volume quartile, with poorer outcomes for the lowest PA volumes. Participants with more sedentary to light intensity PA (&lt;100 milligravities (mg)) and/or less vigorous intensity PA (&gt;250 mg) than average for a given volume of PA, had higher mortality rates than vice versa. Approximate hazard ratios were 0.83 (95% credible interval [CI]: 0.79, 0.88) for an average-risk profile compared to a high-risk profile and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.87) for a low-risk profile compared to an average-risk profile. A high- versus low-risk profile has the equivalent of 15 min more slow walking, but 10 min less moderate walking. At low PA volumes, increasing overall volume suggests the most benefit in reducing all-cause mortality risk. However, at higher overall volumes, substituting lighter with more vigorous intensity activity suggests greater benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20146401</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37510633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Biobanks ; Body mass index ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cohort analysis ; Data collection ; Exercise ; Mortality ; Physical fitness ; Skin cancer</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023-07, Vol.20 (14), p.6401</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-c463de71041921c04a793115acace00fb3a5ba48aca7ff789532b17cabb4be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8946-5776 ; 0000-0002-3242-3951</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2843064016/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2843064016?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37510633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salway, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Nicole Helene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis</creatorcontrib><title>Tortoise or Hare? The Associations between Physical Activity Volume and Intensity Distribution and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Large Prospective Analysis of the UK Biobank</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Analysis methods to determine the optimal combination of volume and intensity of objectively measured physical activity (PA) with prospective outcomes are limited. Participants in UK Biobank were recruited in the UK between 2006 and 2010. We linked the questionnaire and accelerometer with all-cause mortality data from the NHS Information Centre and NHS Central Register up to April 2021. We developed a novel method, extending the penalized spline model of Augustin et al. to a smooth additive Cox model for survival data, and estimated the prospective relationship between intensity distribution and all-cause mortality, adjusting for the overall volume of PA. We followed 84,166 men and women (aged 40-69) for an average of 6.4 years (range 5.3-7.9), with an observed mortality rate of 22.2 deaths per 1000. Survival rates differed by PA volume quartile, with poorer outcomes for the lowest PA volumes. Participants with more sedentary to light intensity PA (&lt;100 milligravities (mg)) and/or less vigorous intensity PA (&gt;250 mg) than average for a given volume of PA, had higher mortality rates than vice versa. Approximate hazard ratios were 0.83 (95% credible interval [CI]: 0.79, 0.88) for an average-risk profile compared to a high-risk profile and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.87) for a low-risk profile compared to an average-risk profile. A high- versus low-risk profile has the equivalent of 15 min more slow walking, but 10 min less moderate walking. At low PA volumes, increasing overall volume suggests the most benefit in reducing all-cause mortality risk. However, at higher overall volumes, substituting lighter with more vigorous intensity activity suggests greater benefit.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Biobanks</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUktvEzEQthCIlsCVI7LEhcsWe-3sg0uVhkcrgqggcF2NndnGqWMH21uUv8UvxNuWquVke-Z7jGeGkJecHQnRsrdmg2G3LhmXlWT8ETnkVcUKWTH--N79gDyLccOYaGTVPiUHop5yVglxSP4sfUjeRKQ-0FMIeEyXa6SzGL02kIx3kSpMvxEdPV_vo9Fg6Uwnc2XSnv70dtgiBbeiZy6hi2PwvYkpGDWM5OtUyoLfTLykvqcza4s5DNnvSzYGmwnv6IwuIFwgPQ8-7nAUzxU4sNkujqRR4MdnemK8Anf5nDzpwUZ8cXtOyPePH5bz02Lx9dPZfLYodNm0vNCyEiusOZO8LblmEupWcD4FDRoZ65WAqQLZ5Hfd93XTTkWpeK1BKalQTMjxjepuUFtcaXQpgO12wWwh7DsPpnuYcWbdXfirjjORxXJzJ-TNrULwvwaMqduaqNFacOiH2JWNlKxpJa8z9PV_0I0fQu7ANUqwcbZVRh3doHTuUwzY31XDWTduQ_dwGzLh1f0_3MH_jV_8BdRqtIo</recordid><startdate>20230719</startdate><enddate>20230719</enddate><creator>Salway, Ruth</creator><creator>Augustin, Nicole Helene</creator><creator>Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-5776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3242-3951</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230719</creationdate><title>Tortoise or Hare? The Associations between Physical Activity Volume and Intensity Distribution and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Large Prospective Analysis of the UK Biobank</title><author>Salway, Ruth ; Augustin, Nicole Helene ; Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-c463de71041921c04a793115acace00fb3a5ba48aca7ff789532b17cabb4be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Biobanks</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salway, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Nicole Helene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salway, Ruth</au><au>Augustin, Nicole Helene</au><au>Armstrong, Miranda Elaine Glynis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tortoise or Hare? The Associations between Physical Activity Volume and Intensity Distribution and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Large Prospective Analysis of the UK Biobank</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2023-07-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>6401</spage><pages>6401-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Analysis methods to determine the optimal combination of volume and intensity of objectively measured physical activity (PA) with prospective outcomes are limited. Participants in UK Biobank were recruited in the UK between 2006 and 2010. We linked the questionnaire and accelerometer with all-cause mortality data from the NHS Information Centre and NHS Central Register up to April 2021. We developed a novel method, extending the penalized spline model of Augustin et al. to a smooth additive Cox model for survival data, and estimated the prospective relationship between intensity distribution and all-cause mortality, adjusting for the overall volume of PA. We followed 84,166 men and women (aged 40-69) for an average of 6.4 years (range 5.3-7.9), with an observed mortality rate of 22.2 deaths per 1000. Survival rates differed by PA volume quartile, with poorer outcomes for the lowest PA volumes. Participants with more sedentary to light intensity PA (&lt;100 milligravities (mg)) and/or less vigorous intensity PA (&gt;250 mg) than average for a given volume of PA, had higher mortality rates than vice versa. Approximate hazard ratios were 0.83 (95% credible interval [CI]: 0.79, 0.88) for an average-risk profile compared to a high-risk profile and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.87) for a low-risk profile compared to an average-risk profile. A high- versus low-risk profile has the equivalent of 15 min more slow walking, but 10 min less moderate walking. At low PA volumes, increasing overall volume suggests the most benefit in reducing all-cause mortality risk. However, at higher overall volumes, substituting lighter with more vigorous intensity activity suggests greater benefit.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37510633</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph20146401</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-5776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3242-3951</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023-07, Vol.20 (14), p.6401
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10378963
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Accelerometers
Biobanks
Body mass index
Cardiovascular disease
Cohort analysis
Data collection
Exercise
Mortality
Physical fitness
Skin cancer
title Tortoise or Hare? The Associations between Physical Activity Volume and Intensity Distribution and the Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Large Prospective Analysis of the UK Biobank
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A46%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tortoise%20or%20Hare?%20The%20Associations%20between%20Physical%20Activity%20Volume%20and%20Intensity%20Distribution%20and%20the%20Risk%20of%20All-Cause%20Mortality:%20A%20Large%20Prospective%20Analysis%20of%20the%20UK%20Biobank&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Salway,%20Ruth&rft.date=2023-07-19&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=6401&rft.pages=6401-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph20146401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2843064016%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-c463de71041921c04a793115acace00fb3a5ba48aca7ff789532b17cabb4be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2843064016&rft_id=info:pmid/37510633&rfr_iscdi=true