Loading…

Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making

The degree of certainty that decision-makers have about their evaluations of available choice alternatives and their confidence about selecting the subjectively best alternative are important factors that affect current and future value-based choices. Assessments of the alternatives in a given choic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2023-06, Vol.23 (3), p.503-521
Main Authors: Lee, Douglas G., Hare, Todd A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c2ea1d3a3ee0ad875589f2e6a6f4e882ce9fe73589a8d0e27e3ae5461dc98e143
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c2ea1d3a3ee0ad875589f2e6a6f4e882ce9fe73589a8d0e27e3ae5461dc98e143
container_end_page 521
container_issue 3
container_start_page 503
container_title Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience
container_volume 23
creator Lee, Douglas G.
Hare, Todd A.
description The degree of certainty that decision-makers have about their evaluations of available choice alternatives and their confidence about selecting the subjectively best alternative are important factors that affect current and future value-based choices. Assessments of the alternatives in a given choice set are rarely unidimensional; their values are usually derived from a combination of multiple distinct attributes. For example, the taste, texture, quantity, and nutritional content of a snack food may all be considered when determining whether to consume it. We examined how certainty about the levels of individual attributes of an option relates to certainty about the overall value of that option as a whole and/or to confidence in having chosen the subjectively best available option. We found that certainty and confidence are derived from unequally weighted combinations of attribute certainties rather than simple, equal combinations of all sources of uncertainty. Attributes that matter more in determining choice outcomes also are weighted more in metacognitive evaluations of certainty or confidence. Moreover, we found that the process of deciding between two alternatives leads to refinements in both attribute estimations and the degree of certainty in those estimates. Attributes that are more important in determining choice outcomes are refined more during the decision process in terms of both estimates and certainty. Although certainty and confidence are typically treated as unidimensional, our results indicate that they, like value estimates, are subjective, multidimensional constructs.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13415-022-01054-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10390628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2765070271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c2ea1d3a3ee0ad875589f2e6a6f4e882ce9fe73589a8d0e27e3ae5461dc98e143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtvFTEQhVeIiITAH6BAK9HQmPi59lYIReEhRaIBRGcGe_Zeh1072F6k_Ht8c0NCKKg8mvP52DOn654x-kpoZU4KE5IpQjknlFEliXzQHTElGGFCfX14XVOiKR8Ou8elXFBKJZf8UXcohkEwTc1R9-0LzCv2DnOFEOtVD9H3bpuCa80Up-AxthIy9ss61-DDgrGEFGHe6aXm1dXS1y3UfrM2uvfowg4gC_wIcfOkO5hgLvj05jzuPr89-3T6npx_fPfh9M05cVKrShxHYF6AQKTgjVbKjBPHAYZJojHc4TihFq0LxlPkGgWgkgPzbjTIpDjuXu99L9fvC3qHsWaY7WUOC-QrmyDY-0oMW7tJvyyjYqQDN83h5Y1DTj9XLNUuoTicZ4iY1mK5HhRt29SsoS_-QS_SmttOGmWkHsVotG4U31Mup1IyTre_YdTuErT7BG1L0F4naHdzPP97jtsrfyJrgNgDpUlxg_nu7f_Y_gZkzKlO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847939877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Lee, Douglas G. ; Hare, Todd A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Douglas G. ; Hare, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><description>The degree of certainty that decision-makers have about their evaluations of available choice alternatives and their confidence about selecting the subjectively best alternative are important factors that affect current and future value-based choices. Assessments of the alternatives in a given choice set are rarely unidimensional; their values are usually derived from a combination of multiple distinct attributes. For example, the taste, texture, quantity, and nutritional content of a snack food may all be considered when determining whether to consume it. We examined how certainty about the levels of individual attributes of an option relates to certainty about the overall value of that option as a whole and/or to confidence in having chosen the subjectively best available option. We found that certainty and confidence are derived from unequally weighted combinations of attribute certainties rather than simple, equal combinations of all sources of uncertainty. Attributes that matter more in determining choice outcomes also are weighted more in metacognitive evaluations of certainty or confidence. Moreover, we found that the process of deciding between two alternatives leads to refinements in both attribute estimations and the degree of certainty in those estimates. Attributes that are more important in determining choice outcomes are refined more during the decision process in terms of both estimates and certainty. Although certainty and confidence are typically treated as unidimensional, our results indicate that they, like value estimates, are subjective, multidimensional constructs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-135X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13415-022-01054-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36631708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Choice Behavior ; Cognitive Psychology ; Decision Making ; Experiments ; Humans ; Mathematical models ; Metacognition ; Neurosciences ; Psychology ; Snack foods ; Special Issue/Uncertainty ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience, 2023-06, Vol.23 (3), p.503-521</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jun 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c2ea1d3a3ee0ad875589f2e6a6f4e882ce9fe73589a8d0e27e3ae5461dc98e143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c2ea1d3a3ee0ad875589f2e6a6f4e882ce9fe73589a8d0e27e3ae5461dc98e143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5892-8694</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36631708$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><title>Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making</title><title>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</title><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><description>The degree of certainty that decision-makers have about their evaluations of available choice alternatives and their confidence about selecting the subjectively best alternative are important factors that affect current and future value-based choices. Assessments of the alternatives in a given choice set are rarely unidimensional; their values are usually derived from a combination of multiple distinct attributes. For example, the taste, texture, quantity, and nutritional content of a snack food may all be considered when determining whether to consume it. We examined how certainty about the levels of individual attributes of an option relates to certainty about the overall value of that option as a whole and/or to confidence in having chosen the subjectively best available option. We found that certainty and confidence are derived from unequally weighted combinations of attribute certainties rather than simple, equal combinations of all sources of uncertainty. Attributes that matter more in determining choice outcomes also are weighted more in metacognitive evaluations of certainty or confidence. Moreover, we found that the process of deciding between two alternatives leads to refinements in both attribute estimations and the degree of certainty in those estimates. Attributes that are more important in determining choice outcomes are refined more during the decision process in terms of both estimates and certainty. Although certainty and confidence are typically treated as unidimensional, our results indicate that they, like value estimates, are subjective, multidimensional constructs.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Snack foods</subject><subject>Special Issue/Uncertainty</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1530-7026</issn><issn>1531-135X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kTtvFTEQhVeIiITAH6BAK9HQmPi59lYIReEhRaIBRGcGe_Zeh1072F6k_Ht8c0NCKKg8mvP52DOn654x-kpoZU4KE5IpQjknlFEliXzQHTElGGFCfX14XVOiKR8Ou8elXFBKJZf8UXcohkEwTc1R9-0LzCv2DnOFEOtVD9H3bpuCa80Up-AxthIy9ss61-DDgrGEFGHe6aXm1dXS1y3UfrM2uvfowg4gC_wIcfOkO5hgLvj05jzuPr89-3T6npx_fPfh9M05cVKrShxHYF6AQKTgjVbKjBPHAYZJojHc4TihFq0LxlPkGgWgkgPzbjTIpDjuXu99L9fvC3qHsWaY7WUOC-QrmyDY-0oMW7tJvyyjYqQDN83h5Y1DTj9XLNUuoTicZ4iY1mK5HhRt29SsoS_-QS_SmttOGmWkHsVotG4U31Mup1IyTre_YdTuErT7BG1L0F4naHdzPP97jtsrfyJrgNgDpUlxg_nu7f_Y_gZkzKlO</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Lee, Douglas G.</creator><creator>Hare, Todd A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-8694</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making</title><author>Lee, Douglas G. ; Hare, Todd A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c2ea1d3a3ee0ad875589f2e6a6f4e882ce9fe73589a8d0e27e3ae5461dc98e143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Snack foods</topic><topic>Special Issue/Uncertainty</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Douglas G.</au><au>Hare, Todd A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>521</epage><pages>503-521</pages><issn>1530-7026</issn><eissn>1531-135X</eissn><abstract>The degree of certainty that decision-makers have about their evaluations of available choice alternatives and their confidence about selecting the subjectively best alternative are important factors that affect current and future value-based choices. Assessments of the alternatives in a given choice set are rarely unidimensional; their values are usually derived from a combination of multiple distinct attributes. For example, the taste, texture, quantity, and nutritional content of a snack food may all be considered when determining whether to consume it. We examined how certainty about the levels of individual attributes of an option relates to certainty about the overall value of that option as a whole and/or to confidence in having chosen the subjectively best available option. We found that certainty and confidence are derived from unequally weighted combinations of attribute certainties rather than simple, equal combinations of all sources of uncertainty. Attributes that matter more in determining choice outcomes also are weighted more in metacognitive evaluations of certainty or confidence. Moreover, we found that the process of deciding between two alternatives leads to refinements in both attribute estimations and the degree of certainty in those estimates. Attributes that are more important in determining choice outcomes are refined more during the decision process in terms of both estimates and certainty. Although certainty and confidence are typically treated as unidimensional, our results indicate that they, like value estimates, are subjective, multidimensional constructs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36631708</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13415-022-01054-4</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-8694</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-7026
ispartof Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2023-06, Vol.23 (3), p.503-521
issn 1530-7026
1531-135X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10390628
source Springer Nature
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Choice Behavior
Cognitive Psychology
Decision Making
Experiments
Humans
Mathematical models
Metacognition
Neurosciences
Psychology
Snack foods
Special Issue/Uncertainty
Uncertainty
title Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T22%3A13%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20certainty%20and%20choice%20confidence%20are%20multidimensional%20constructs%20that%20guide%20decision-making&rft.jtitle=Cognitive,%20affective,%20&%20behavioral%20neuroscience&rft.au=Lee,%20Douglas%20G.&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=521&rft.pages=503-521&rft.issn=1530-7026&rft.eissn=1531-135X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13415-022-01054-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2765070271%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c2ea1d3a3ee0ad875589f2e6a6f4e882ce9fe73589a8d0e27e3ae5461dc98e143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847939877&rft_id=info:pmid/36631708&rfr_iscdi=true