Loading…

Bone Metastases Detection in Patients with Breast Cancer: Does Bone Scintigraphy Add Information to PET/CT?

Abstract Background Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become in recent years a tool for breast cancer (BC) staging. However, its accuracy to detect bone metastases is classically considered inferior to bone scintigraphy (BS). The purpose of this work is to compare the eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Ohio), 2023-08, Vol.28 (8), p.e600-e605
Main Authors: Cristo Santos, Joana, Henriques Abreu, Miguel, Seoane Santos, Miriam, Duarte, Hugo, Alpoim, Tiago, Próspero, Inês, Sousa, Susana, Henriques Abreu, Pedro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become in recent years a tool for breast cancer (BC) staging. However, its accuracy to detect bone metastases is classically considered inferior to bone scintigraphy (BS). The purpose of this work is to compare the effectiveness of bone metastases detection between PET/CT and BS. Materials and Methods Prospective study of 410 female patients treated in a Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2014 and 2020 that performed PET/CT and BS for staging purposes. The image analysis was performed by 2 senior nuclear medicine physicians. The comparison was performed based on accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on a patient and anatomical region level and was assessed using McNemar’s Test. An average ROC was calculated for the anatomical region analysis. Results PET/CT presented higher values of accuracy and sensitivity (98.0% and 93.83%), surpassing BS (95.61% and 81.48%) in detecting bone disease. There was a significant difference in favor of PET/CT (sensitivity 93.83% vs. 81.48%), however, there is no significant difference in eliminating false positives (specificity 99.09% vs. 99.09%). PET/CT presented the highest accuracy and sensitivity values for most of the bone segments, only surpassed by BS for the cranium. There was a significant difference in favor of PET/CT in the upper limb, spine, thorax (sternum) and lower limb (pelvis and sacrum), and in favor of BS in the cranium. The ROC showed that PET/CT has a higher sensitivity and consistency across the bone segments. Conclusion With the correct imaging protocol, PET/CT does not require BS for patients with BC staging. This article compares the effectiveness of the PET/CT scan and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
ISSN:1083-7159
1549-490X
DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyad087