Loading…
Efficacy of single‐pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single‐pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science collected only randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of single‐pil...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) N.J.), 2023-08, Vol.46 (8), p.886-898 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-ece32e4c19912e1cc973151681e16ace5109f13d20b8d9ce3e4cf890f965951c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-ece32e4c19912e1cc973151681e16ace5109f13d20b8d9ce3e4cf890f965951c3 |
container_end_page | 898 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 886 |
container_title | Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Xie, Mengxin Tang, Tianjiao Liang, Hongsheng |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single‐pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science collected only randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs in people with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The search period is from the establishment of the database to July 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manage 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software. This review ultimately included 32 references involving 16 273 patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The results of the network meta‐analysis showed that a total of 11 single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs were included, namely: Amlodipine/valsartan, Telmisartan/amlodipine, Losartan/HCTZ, Candesartan/HCTZ, Amlodipine/benazepril, Telmisartan/HCTZ, Valsartan/HCTZ, Irbesartan/amlodipine, Amlodipine/losartan, Irbesartan/HCTZ, and Perindopril/amlodipine. According to SUCRA, Irbesartan/amlodipine may rank first in reducing systolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 92.2%); Amlodipine/losartan may rank first in reducing diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 95.1%); Telmisartan/amlodipine may rank first in blood pressure control rates (SUCRA: 83.5%); Amlodipine/losartan probably ranks first in diastolic response rate (SUCRA: 84.5%). Based on Ranking Plot of the Network, we can conclude that single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs are superior to monotherapy, and ARB/CCB combination has better advantages than other SPC in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure control rate, and diastolic response rate. However, due to the small number of some drug studies, the lack of relevant studies has led to not being included in this study, which may impact the results, and readers should interpret the results with caution.
High blood pressure significantly increases the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease and is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide. Single‐pill combination preparations are a hot topic in the field of treatment of essential hypertension. In this study, the efficacy of different single‐pill combinations (SPCs) in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension w |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/clc.24082 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10436803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2852596453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-ece32e4c19912e1cc973151681e16ace5109f13d20b8d9ce3e4cf890f965951c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10ctKHTEcBvBQWurRdtEXKIFu6mI0t7mkG5GDl8IBN3YdcjL_0dhMckxmPMyi0EfoM_okRo-KCl1lkV8-vvAh9IWSPUoI2zfO7DFBGvYOzajkrGhqXr9HM0IrUkjWyC20ndJVptnwj2iL14KzmtAZ-nPUddZoM-HQ4WT9hYPbv_9W1jlsQr-0Xg82eGw9Hr0JfojBOWgxpAR-sNrhy2kFcQCfMvuBD3Ga0gB9fmVwhBsLa6x9iz0M6xB_4x4GnfO1125KNn1CHzrtEnx-PHfQr-Oj8_lpsTg7-Tk_XBRGCMEKMMAZCEOlpAyoMbLmtKRVQ4FW2kBJiewobxlZNq3MONuukaSTVSlLavgOOtjkrsZlD63J3aN2ahVtr-Okgrbq9Y23l-oi3ChKBK8awnPC98eEGK5HSIPqbTLgnPYQxqRYU3IpWM1Jpt_e0KswxvzjB8VKWYnyPnB3o0wMKUXonttQou5XVXlV9bBqtl9f1n-WTzNmsL8Ba-tg-n-Smi_mm8g7avqwhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2852596453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of single‐pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Xie, Mengxin ; Tang, Tianjiao ; Liang, Hongsheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Mengxin ; Tang, Tianjiao ; Liang, Hongsheng</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single‐pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science collected only randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs in people with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The search period is from the establishment of the database to July 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manage 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software. This review ultimately included 32 references involving 16 273 patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The results of the network meta‐analysis showed that a total of 11 single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs were included, namely: Amlodipine/valsartan, Telmisartan/amlodipine, Losartan/HCTZ, Candesartan/HCTZ, Amlodipine/benazepril, Telmisartan/HCTZ, Valsartan/HCTZ, Irbesartan/amlodipine, Amlodipine/losartan, Irbesartan/HCTZ, and Perindopril/amlodipine. According to SUCRA, Irbesartan/amlodipine may rank first in reducing systolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 92.2%); Amlodipine/losartan may rank first in reducing diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 95.1%); Telmisartan/amlodipine may rank first in blood pressure control rates (SUCRA: 83.5%); Amlodipine/losartan probably ranks first in diastolic response rate (SUCRA: 84.5%). Based on Ranking Plot of the Network, we can conclude that single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs are superior to monotherapy, and ARB/CCB combination has better advantages than other SPC in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure control rate, and diastolic response rate. However, due to the small number of some drug studies, the lack of relevant studies has led to not being included in this study, which may impact the results, and readers should interpret the results with caution.
High blood pressure significantly increases the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease and is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide. Single‐pill combination preparations are a hot topic in the field of treatment of essential hypertension. In this study, the efficacy of different single‐pill combinations (SPCs) in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension was evaluated by network meta‐analysis, and the optimal treatment regimen was selected according to SUCRA values, and the results showed that the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium‐channel blockers (CCB) combination had a significant advantage in lowering blood pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-9289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-8737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/clc.24082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37432701</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Antihypertensives ; Blood pressure ; Cardiovascular disease ; Clinical trials ; control rate ; Drugs ; essential hypertension ; Hypertension ; Intervention ; Meta-analysis ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Mortality ; network meta‐analysis ; Patient compliance ; Response rates ; Review ; Reviews ; single‐pill combination ; Software ; Uric acid</subject><ispartof>Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.), 2023-08, Vol.46 (8), p.886-898</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-ece32e4c19912e1cc973151681e16ace5109f13d20b8d9ce3e4cf890f965951c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-ece32e4c19912e1cc973151681e16ace5109f13d20b8d9ce3e4cf890f965951c3</cites><orcidid>0009-0001-0882-4392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2852596453/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2852596453?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11542,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,46030,46454,53769,53771,74872</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37432701$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Mengxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Tianjiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Hongsheng</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of single‐pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis</title><title>Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Clin Cardiol</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single‐pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science collected only randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs in people with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The search period is from the establishment of the database to July 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manage 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software. This review ultimately included 32 references involving 16 273 patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The results of the network meta‐analysis showed that a total of 11 single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs were included, namely: Amlodipine/valsartan, Telmisartan/amlodipine, Losartan/HCTZ, Candesartan/HCTZ, Amlodipine/benazepril, Telmisartan/HCTZ, Valsartan/HCTZ, Irbesartan/amlodipine, Amlodipine/losartan, Irbesartan/HCTZ, and Perindopril/amlodipine. According to SUCRA, Irbesartan/amlodipine may rank first in reducing systolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 92.2%); Amlodipine/losartan may rank first in reducing diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 95.1%); Telmisartan/amlodipine may rank first in blood pressure control rates (SUCRA: 83.5%); Amlodipine/losartan probably ranks first in diastolic response rate (SUCRA: 84.5%). Based on Ranking Plot of the Network, we can conclude that single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs are superior to monotherapy, and ARB/CCB combination has better advantages than other SPC in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure control rate, and diastolic response rate. However, due to the small number of some drug studies, the lack of relevant studies has led to not being included in this study, which may impact the results, and readers should interpret the results with caution.
High blood pressure significantly increases the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease and is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide. Single‐pill combination preparations are a hot topic in the field of treatment of essential hypertension. In this study, the efficacy of different single‐pill combinations (SPCs) in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension was evaluated by network meta‐analysis, and the optimal treatment regimen was selected according to SUCRA values, and the results showed that the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium‐channel blockers (CCB) combination had a significant advantage in lowering blood pressure.</description><subject>Antihypertensives</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>control rate</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>essential hypertension</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>network meta‐analysis</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>single‐pill combination</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Uric acid</subject><issn>0160-9289</issn><issn>1932-8737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp10ctKHTEcBvBQWurRdtEXKIFu6mI0t7mkG5GDl8IBN3YdcjL_0dhMckxmPMyi0EfoM_okRo-KCl1lkV8-vvAh9IWSPUoI2zfO7DFBGvYOzajkrGhqXr9HM0IrUkjWyC20ndJVptnwj2iL14KzmtAZ-nPUddZoM-HQ4WT9hYPbv_9W1jlsQr-0Xg82eGw9Hr0JfojBOWgxpAR-sNrhy2kFcQCfMvuBD3Ga0gB9fmVwhBsLa6x9iz0M6xB_4x4GnfO1125KNn1CHzrtEnx-PHfQr-Oj8_lpsTg7-Tk_XBRGCMEKMMAZCEOlpAyoMbLmtKRVQ4FW2kBJiewobxlZNq3MONuukaSTVSlLavgOOtjkrsZlD63J3aN2ahVtr-Okgrbq9Y23l-oi3ChKBK8awnPC98eEGK5HSIPqbTLgnPYQxqRYU3IpWM1Jpt_e0KswxvzjB8VKWYnyPnB3o0wMKUXonttQou5XVXlV9bBqtl9f1n-WTzNmsL8Ba-tg-n-Smi_mm8g7avqwhw</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Xie, Mengxin</creator><creator>Tang, Tianjiao</creator><creator>Liang, Hongsheng</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0882-4392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Efficacy of single‐pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis</title><author>Xie, Mengxin ; Tang, Tianjiao ; Liang, Hongsheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-ece32e4c19912e1cc973151681e16ace5109f13d20b8d9ce3e4cf890f965951c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antihypertensives</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>control rate</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>essential hypertension</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>network meta‐analysis</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>single‐pill combination</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Uric acid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Mengxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Tianjiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Hongsheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Mengxin</au><au>Tang, Tianjiao</au><au>Liang, Hongsheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of single‐pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Cardiol</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>886</spage><epage>898</epage><pages>886-898</pages><issn>0160-9289</issn><eissn>1932-8737</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single‐pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. Through Searching Pubmed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science collected only randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs in people with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The search period is from the establishment of the database to July 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manage 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software. This review ultimately included 32 references involving 16 273 patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension. The results of the network meta‐analysis showed that a total of 11 single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs were included, namely: Amlodipine/valsartan, Telmisartan/amlodipine, Losartan/HCTZ, Candesartan/HCTZ, Amlodipine/benazepril, Telmisartan/HCTZ, Valsartan/HCTZ, Irbesartan/amlodipine, Amlodipine/losartan, Irbesartan/HCTZ, and Perindopril/amlodipine. According to SUCRA, Irbesartan/amlodipine may rank first in reducing systolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 92.2%); Amlodipine/losartan may rank first in reducing diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA: 95.1%); Telmisartan/amlodipine may rank first in blood pressure control rates (SUCRA: 83.5%); Amlodipine/losartan probably ranks first in diastolic response rate (SUCRA: 84.5%). Based on Ranking Plot of the Network, we can conclude that single‐pill combination antihypertensive drugs are superior to monotherapy, and ARB/CCB combination has better advantages than other SPC in terms of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure control rate, and diastolic response rate. However, due to the small number of some drug studies, the lack of relevant studies has led to not being included in this study, which may impact the results, and readers should interpret the results with caution.
High blood pressure significantly increases the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease and is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide. Single‐pill combination preparations are a hot topic in the field of treatment of essential hypertension. In this study, the efficacy of different single‐pill combinations (SPCs) in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension was evaluated by network meta‐analysis, and the optimal treatment regimen was selected according to SUCRA values, and the results showed that the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium‐channel blockers (CCB) combination had a significant advantage in lowering blood pressure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37432701</pmid><doi>10.1002/clc.24082</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0882-4392</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-9289 |
ispartof | Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.), 2023-08, Vol.46 (8), p.886-898 |
issn | 0160-9289 1932-8737 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10436803 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Antihypertensives Blood pressure Cardiovascular disease Clinical trials control rate Drugs essential hypertension Hypertension Intervention Meta-analysis Monte Carlo simulation Mortality network meta‐analysis Patient compliance Response rates Review Reviews single‐pill combination Software Uric acid |
title | Efficacy of single‐pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A54%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20single%E2%80%90pill%20combination%20in%20uncontrolled%20essential%20hypertension:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20network%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cardiology%20(Mahwah,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Xie,%20Mengxin&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=886&rft.epage=898&rft.pages=886-898&rft.issn=0160-9289&rft.eissn=1932-8737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/clc.24082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2852596453%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4442-ece32e4c19912e1cc973151681e16ace5109f13d20b8d9ce3e4cf890f965951c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2852596453&rft_id=info:pmid/37432701&rfr_iscdi=true |