Evaluating the identification of the extent of gastric cancer by over-1000 nm near-infrared hyperspectral imaging using surgical specimens

• Published in: Journal of biomedical optics 2023-08, Vol.28 (8), p.86001-086001
• Main Authors: Mitsui, Tomohiro, Mori, Akino, Takamatsu, Toshihiro, Kadota, Tomohiro, Sato, Konosuke, Fukushima, Ryodai, Okubo, Kyohei, Umezawa, Masakazu, Takemura, Hiroshi, Yokota, Hideo, Kuwata, Takeshi, Kinoshita, Takahiro, Ikematsu, Hiroaki, Yano, Tomonori, Maeda, Shin, Soga, Kohei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cameras; Cancer; Datasets; Electric industries; Endoscopy; Evaluation; Exposure; Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Gastrointestinal surgery; Hepatitis; Hyperspectral imaging; I.R. radiation; Imaging; Infrared imaging; Machine learning; Medical imaging; Mucosa; Near infrared radiation; Spectrum analysis; Support vector machines; Thickness; Tumors
• ISSN: 1083-3668; 1560-2281
• DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.28.8.086001

SignificanceDetermining the extent of gastric cancer (GC) is necessary for evaluating the gastrectomy margin for GC. Additionally, determining the extent of the GC that is not exposed to the mucosal surface remains difficult. However, near-infrared (NIR) can penetrate mucosal tissues highly efficiently.AimWe investigated the ability of near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (NIR-HSI) to identify GC areas, including exposed and unexposed using surgical specimens, and explored the identifiable characteristics of the GC.ApproachOur study examined 10 patients with diagnosed GC who underwent surgery between 2020 and 2021. Specimen images were captured using NIR-HSI. For the specimens, the exposed area was defined as an area wherein the cancer was exposed on the surface, the unexposed area as an area wherein the cancer was present although the surface was covered by normal tissue, and the normal area as an area wherein the cancer was absent. We estimated the GC (including the exposed and unexposed areas) and normal areas using a support vector machine, which is a machine-learning method for classification. The prediction accuracy of the GC region in every area and normal region was evaluated. Additionally, the tumor thicknesses of the GC were pathologically measured, and their differences in identifiable and unidentifiable areas were compared using NIR-HSI.ResultsThe average prediction accuracy of the GC regions combined with both areas was 77.2%; with exposed and unexposed areas was 79.7% and 68.5%, respectively; and with normal regions was 79.7%. Additionally, the areas identified as cancerous had a tumor thickness of >2 mm.ConclusionsNIR-HSI identified the GC regions with high rates. As a feature, the exposed and unexposed areas with tumor thicknesses of >2 mm were identified using NIR-HSI.