Exploration of a Potential Desirability of Outcome Ranking Endpoint for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Using 9 Registrational Trials for Antibacterial Drugs

• Published in: Clinical infectious diseases 2023-08, Vol.77 (4), p.649-656
• Main Authors: Kinamon, Tori, Gopinath, Ramya, Waack, Ursula, Needles, Mark, Rubin, Daniel, Collyar, Deborah, Doernberg, Sarah B, Evans, Scott, Hamasaki, Toshimitsu, Holland, Thomas L, Howard-Anderson, Jessica, Chambers, Henry, Fowler, Vance G, Nambiar, Sumati, Kim, Peter, Boucher, Helen W
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Immunology; Infectious Diseases; Major; Microbiology
• ISSN: 1058-4838; 1537-6591
• DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad239

Abstract Background Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) is a novel approach to clinical trial design that incorporates safety and efficacy assessments into an ordinal ranking system to evaluate overall outcomes of clinical trial participants. Here, we derived and applied a disease-specific DOOR endpoint to registrational trials for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI). Methods Initially, we applied an a priori DOOR prototype to electronic patient-level data from 9 phase 3 noninferiority trials for cIAI submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration between 2005 and 2019. We derived a cIAI-specific DOOR endpoint based on clinically meaningful events that trial participants experienced. Next, we applied the cIAI-specific DOOR endpoint to the same datasets and, for each trial, estimated the probability that a participant assigned to the study treatment would have a more desirable DOOR or component outcome than if assigned to the comparator. Results Three key findings informed the cIAI-specific DOOR endpoint: (1) a significant proportion of participants underwent additional surgical procedures related to their baseline infection; (2) infectious complications of cIAI were diverse; and (3) participants with worse outcomes experienced more infectious complications, more serious adverse events, and underwent more procedures. DOOR distributions between treatment arms were similar in all trials. DOOR probability estimates ranged from 47.4% to 50.3% and were not significantly different. Component analyses depicted risk-benefit assessments of study treatment versus comparator. Conclusions We designed and evaluated a potential DOOR endpoint for cIAI trials to further characterize overall clinical experiences of participants. Similar data-driven approaches can be utilized to create other infectious disease–specific DOOR endpoints. Utilizing patient-level data from 9 registrational phase 3 clinical trials for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), we defined and evaluated a desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) endpoint for cIAI that provides a novel approach to understanding overall outcomes among trial participants.