Loading…

Pars plana vitrectomy for tractional diabetic macular edema with or without internal limiting membrane peeling

Background: The effectiveness of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the surgical treatment of tractional diabetic macular edema (DME), although widely examined, remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of tractional DME...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology discovery and innovation in ophthalmology, 2022-12, Vol.11 (3), p.110-118
Main Authors: Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali, Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed, Hammed, Abdullah Hussein
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-2c23a73273ff4f9371fb6053b334551ccfaca94338f85c40ae4e2b4919bb0f813
cites
container_end_page 118
container_issue 3
container_start_page 110
container_title Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology
container_volume 11
creator Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali
Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed
Hammed, Abdullah Hussein
description Background: The effectiveness of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the surgical treatment of tractional diabetic macular edema (DME), although widely examined, remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of tractional DME and to highlight any benefits of additional ILM peeling. Methods: This was an open-label, prospective, comparative, and interventional study that enrolled 50 eyes with tractional DME that underwent PPV and allocated each to one of two groups: group A consisted of 25 eyes that had no ILM peeling and group B consisted of 25 eyes that underwent ILM peeling. Postoperative assessments of best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) notation and central macular thickness (CMT) were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: At baseline, the two groups were comparable in terms of sex ratios, phakic status, insulin use, coexistence of hypertension, and mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, BCDVA, CMT, duration of diabetes mellitus, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. In group A, the mean (SD) BCDVA improved significantly from 0.89 (0.12) logMAR preoperatively to 0.64 (0.24) logMAR (P < 0.001), and the mean (SD) CMT declined significantly from 471.28 (80.83) micrometer to 228.20 (26.45) micrometer (P < 0.001), at the 6-month postoperative assessment. Likewise, in group B, the mean (SD) BCDVA improved significantly from 0.83 (0.10) logMAR preoperatively to 0.58 (0.24) logMAR (P < 0.001), and the mean (SD) CMT decreased significantly from 496.84 (89.82) micrometer to 226.20 (18.04) micrometer (P < 0.001), after 6 months. There were no significant differences between groups A and B in the changes in BCDVA (Delta BCDVA) or CMT (Delta CMT) at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively with respect to the baseline values (all P > 0.05). Postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. A significant negative correlation was detected between the preoperative HbA1c level and BCDVA improvement in all participants (r = - 0.82; P < 0.001). Conclusions: PPV is an effective treatment for tractional DME. Additional ILM peeling was not significantly associated with functional and anatomical benefits over a short period. Long-term glycemic control plays a role in vision gain after vitrectomy in patients with diabetes. Further long-term studies are required to verify our findings.
doi_str_mv 10.51329/mehdiophthal1454
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10445315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2786446672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-2c23a73273ff4f9371fb6053b334551ccfaca94338f85c40ae4e2b4919bb0f813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1rHDEMhofQQEKaH5CbIZdcthl_7XhOoSz9CCy0h-RsNF55x4s9ntqelPz7epNQ2ugiIT28SK-a5oq2nyTlrL8NOO5cnMcygqdCipPmnHHGVpzR_sM_9VlzmfOhrdELyhQ7b6afkDKZPUxAnlxJaEoMz8TGREoCU1ycwJOdgwGLMySAWTwkgjsMQH67MpJKHnNcCnFTwXTkvQuuuGlPAoYhwYRkRvS18bE5teAzXr7li-bx65eHzffV9se3-83n7cqwrisrZhiHjrOOWytszztqh3Ur-cC5kJIaY8FALzhXVkkjWkCBbBA97YehtYryi-buVXdehoA7g1O9xus5uQDpWUdw-v_J5Ea9j0-atkJITmVVuHlTSPHXgrno4LJBX53CuGTNlFS9UtX9il6_Qw9xOfpQqU6thVivO1Yp-kqZFHNOaP9uQ1v98kb9_o38D2unloo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786446672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pars plana vitrectomy for tractional diabetic macular edema with or without internal limiting membrane peeling</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali ; Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed ; Hammed, Abdullah Hussein</creator><creatorcontrib>Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali ; Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed ; Hammed, Abdullah Hussein</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The effectiveness of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the surgical treatment of tractional diabetic macular edema (DME), although widely examined, remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of tractional DME and to highlight any benefits of additional ILM peeling. Methods: This was an open-label, prospective, comparative, and interventional study that enrolled 50 eyes with tractional DME that underwent PPV and allocated each to one of two groups: group A consisted of 25 eyes that had no ILM peeling and group B consisted of 25 eyes that underwent ILM peeling. Postoperative assessments of best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) notation and central macular thickness (CMT) were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: At baseline, the two groups were comparable in terms of sex ratios, phakic status, insulin use, coexistence of hypertension, and mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, BCDVA, CMT, duration of diabetes mellitus, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. In group A, the mean (SD) BCDVA improved significantly from 0.89 (0.12) logMAR preoperatively to 0.64 (0.24) logMAR (P &lt; 0.001), and the mean (SD) CMT declined significantly from 471.28 (80.83) micrometer to 228.20 (26.45) micrometer (P &lt; 0.001), at the 6-month postoperative assessment. Likewise, in group B, the mean (SD) BCDVA improved significantly from 0.83 (0.10) logMAR preoperatively to 0.58 (0.24) logMAR (P &lt; 0.001), and the mean (SD) CMT decreased significantly from 496.84 (89.82) micrometer to 226.20 (18.04) micrometer (P &lt; 0.001), after 6 months. There were no significant differences between groups A and B in the changes in BCDVA (Delta BCDVA) or CMT (Delta CMT) at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively with respect to the baseline values (all P &gt; 0.05). Postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. A significant negative correlation was detected between the preoperative HbA1c level and BCDVA improvement in all participants (r = - 0.82; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: PPV is an effective treatment for tractional DME. Additional ILM peeling was not significantly associated with functional and anatomical benefits over a short period. Long-term glycemic control plays a role in vision gain after vitrectomy in patients with diabetes. Further long-term studies are required to verify our findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2322-3219</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2322-4436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2322-3219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: International Virtual Ophthalmic Research Center (IVORC)</publisher><subject>Cataracts ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Edema ; Hemoglobin ; Hypertension ; Hypotheses ; Ischemia ; Ophthalmology ; Original ; Patients ; Surgery ; Tomography ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology, 2022-12, Vol.11 (3), p.110-118</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s).</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-2c23a73273ff4f9371fb6053b334551ccfaca94338f85c40ae4e2b4919bb0f813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445315/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2786446672?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammed, Abdullah Hussein</creatorcontrib><title>Pars plana vitrectomy for tractional diabetic macular edema with or without internal limiting membrane peeling</title><title>Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology</title><description>Background: The effectiveness of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the surgical treatment of tractional diabetic macular edema (DME), although widely examined, remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of tractional DME and to highlight any benefits of additional ILM peeling. Methods: This was an open-label, prospective, comparative, and interventional study that enrolled 50 eyes with tractional DME that underwent PPV and allocated each to one of two groups: group A consisted of 25 eyes that had no ILM peeling and group B consisted of 25 eyes that underwent ILM peeling. Postoperative assessments of best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) notation and central macular thickness (CMT) were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: At baseline, the two groups were comparable in terms of sex ratios, phakic status, insulin use, coexistence of hypertension, and mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, BCDVA, CMT, duration of diabetes mellitus, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. In group A, the mean (SD) BCDVA improved significantly from 0.89 (0.12) logMAR preoperatively to 0.64 (0.24) logMAR (P &lt; 0.001), and the mean (SD) CMT declined significantly from 471.28 (80.83) micrometer to 228.20 (26.45) micrometer (P &lt; 0.001), at the 6-month postoperative assessment. Likewise, in group B, the mean (SD) BCDVA improved significantly from 0.83 (0.10) logMAR preoperatively to 0.58 (0.24) logMAR (P &lt; 0.001), and the mean (SD) CMT decreased significantly from 496.84 (89.82) micrometer to 226.20 (18.04) micrometer (P &lt; 0.001), after 6 months. There were no significant differences between groups A and B in the changes in BCDVA (Delta BCDVA) or CMT (Delta CMT) at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively with respect to the baseline values (all P &gt; 0.05). Postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. A significant negative correlation was detected between the preoperative HbA1c level and BCDVA improvement in all participants (r = - 0.82; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: PPV is an effective treatment for tractional DME. Additional ILM peeling was not significantly associated with functional and anatomical benefits over a short period. Long-term glycemic control plays a role in vision gain after vitrectomy in patients with diabetes. Further long-term studies are required to verify our findings.</description><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>2322-3219</issn><issn>2322-4436</issn><issn>2322-3219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1rHDEMhofQQEKaH5CbIZdcthl_7XhOoSz9CCy0h-RsNF55x4s9ntqelPz7epNQ2ugiIT28SK-a5oq2nyTlrL8NOO5cnMcygqdCipPmnHHGVpzR_sM_9VlzmfOhrdELyhQ7b6afkDKZPUxAnlxJaEoMz8TGREoCU1ycwJOdgwGLMySAWTwkgjsMQH67MpJKHnNcCnFTwXTkvQuuuGlPAoYhwYRkRvS18bE5teAzXr7li-bx65eHzffV9se3-83n7cqwrisrZhiHjrOOWytszztqh3Ur-cC5kJIaY8FALzhXVkkjWkCBbBA97YehtYryi-buVXdehoA7g1O9xus5uQDpWUdw-v_J5Ea9j0-atkJITmVVuHlTSPHXgrno4LJBX53CuGTNlFS9UtX9il6_Qw9xOfpQqU6thVivO1Yp-kqZFHNOaP9uQ1v98kb9_o38D2unloo</recordid><startdate>20221203</startdate><enddate>20221203</enddate><creator>Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali</creator><creator>Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed</creator><creator>Hammed, Abdullah Hussein</creator><general>International Virtual Ophthalmic Research Center (IVORC)</general><general>International Virtual Ophthalmic Research Center</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221203</creationdate><title>Pars plana vitrectomy for tractional diabetic macular edema with or without internal limiting membrane peeling</title><author>Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali ; Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed ; Hammed, Abdullah Hussein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-2c23a73273ff4f9371fb6053b334551ccfaca94338f85c40ae4e2b4919bb0f813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammed, Abdullah Hussein</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khattab, Abdelrahman Ahmed Ali</au><au>Ahmed, Mahmoud Mohammed</au><au>Hammed, Abdullah Hussein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pars plana vitrectomy for tractional diabetic macular edema with or without internal limiting membrane peeling</atitle><jtitle>Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology</jtitle><date>2022-12-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>110-118</pages><issn>2322-3219</issn><issn>2322-4436</issn><eissn>2322-3219</eissn><abstract>Background: The effectiveness of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the surgical treatment of tractional diabetic macular edema (DME), although widely examined, remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of tractional DME and to highlight any benefits of additional ILM peeling. Methods: This was an open-label, prospective, comparative, and interventional study that enrolled 50 eyes with tractional DME that underwent PPV and allocated each to one of two groups: group A consisted of 25 eyes that had no ILM peeling and group B consisted of 25 eyes that underwent ILM peeling. Postoperative assessments of best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) in the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) notation and central macular thickness (CMT) were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: At baseline, the two groups were comparable in terms of sex ratios, phakic status, insulin use, coexistence of hypertension, and mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, BCDVA, CMT, duration of diabetes mellitus, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. In group A, the mean (SD) BCDVA improved significantly from 0.89 (0.12) logMAR preoperatively to 0.64 (0.24) logMAR (P &lt; 0.001), and the mean (SD) CMT declined significantly from 471.28 (80.83) micrometer to 228.20 (26.45) micrometer (P &lt; 0.001), at the 6-month postoperative assessment. Likewise, in group B, the mean (SD) BCDVA improved significantly from 0.83 (0.10) logMAR preoperatively to 0.58 (0.24) logMAR (P &lt; 0.001), and the mean (SD) CMT decreased significantly from 496.84 (89.82) micrometer to 226.20 (18.04) micrometer (P &lt; 0.001), after 6 months. There were no significant differences between groups A and B in the changes in BCDVA (Delta BCDVA) or CMT (Delta CMT) at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively with respect to the baseline values (all P &gt; 0.05). Postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. A significant negative correlation was detected between the preoperative HbA1c level and BCDVA improvement in all participants (r = - 0.82; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: PPV is an effective treatment for tractional DME. Additional ILM peeling was not significantly associated with functional and anatomical benefits over a short period. Long-term glycemic control plays a role in vision gain after vitrectomy in patients with diabetes. Further long-term studies are required to verify our findings.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>International Virtual Ophthalmic Research Center (IVORC)</pub><doi>10.51329/mehdiophthal1454</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2322-3219
ispartof Medical hypothesis, discovery and innovation in ophthalmology, 2022-12, Vol.11 (3), p.110-118
issn 2322-3219
2322-4436
2322-3219
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10445315
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Cataracts
Diabetes
Diabetic retinopathy
Edema
Hemoglobin
Hypertension
Hypotheses
Ischemia
Ophthalmology
Original
Patients
Surgery
Tomography
Visual acuity
title Pars plana vitrectomy for tractional diabetic macular edema with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T11%3A31%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pars%20plana%20vitrectomy%20for%20tractional%20diabetic%20macular%20edema%20with%20or%20without%20internal%20limiting%20membrane%20peeling&rft.jtitle=Medical%20hypothesis,%20discovery%20and%20innovation%20in%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Khattab,%20Abdelrahman%20Ahmed%20Ali&rft.date=2022-12-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=110-118&rft.issn=2322-3219&rft.eissn=2322-3219&rft_id=info:doi/10.51329/mehdiophthal1454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2786446672%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-2c23a73273ff4f9371fb6053b334551ccfaca94338f85c40ae4e2b4919bb0f813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786446672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true